Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

The Actual Factual States

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

Minnesotan's Public Proclamation: No Private Law is Superior

 

Minnesotan's Public Proclamation:
No Private Law is Superior


By: Jim Homyak 
Adapted from Anna Von Reitz


Let's get together, in our meeting of the minds, and accept the proven fact that our rights as an individual man or woman to privately contract are unlimited—within the realm of his or her own body, conscience and private matters, but that does not overcome the Public, International, and Natural Laws already established.

For instance: A mafia assassin can't avoid murder charges by claiming he had a contract to do it. Private contracts cannot and do not overcome Public Law. If the opposite premise prevails any crime could be "legalized" at whim and on an individual basis. We do have many rights available such as the right to be properly identified as a natural man or woman and to correct errors in any information making reference to ourselves, among the large list of unalienable rights.

When public and private law get commingled and public interest presumes to create private contracts and impose them in secret on individuals, a corollary situation exists:

No public-private contract can overcome Public Law, either.

Now that slavery was abolished in the Public Law very long ago, no modern government can privately contract with individuals to enslave them. People may also issue their "autograph" instead of their "signature" to denote they are retaining authorship rights to content written for them as if they wrote it themselves.

Yet, this demand for a signature was precisely what has happened to create the web of venal interlocking trust directorships operated by the Bar Associations in the form of "public interest trusts" which are all based on either the acceptance or rejection of citizenship obligations.

That's why they [BAR LAWYERS] are so hot and heavy to describe everyone as a "citizen" and to presume that everyone they see is a "citizen" under private contract to perform public duties. This is their "hook" used to illegally latch onto you and your property assets and what they use to subject you to their foreign Roman Law. They have put False Claims in place and have claimed to own you as a slave known as a "citizen of the United States" and also as a "Person" and also as a "LEGAL PERSON" with no respect to your natural and powerful standing.

Author, researcher and Fiduciary Anna Maria Reizinger (aka Anna Von Reitz) has diligently exposed the whole system of illegal and immoral latching that takes place when your Mother is asked, "Is your baby a citizen of the United States?"

Thinking that they are talking about our country, The United States, and not knowing and not being told the definition of "citizen" millions upon millions of American mothers gave the wrong answer, and for six generations the Vermin have capitalized on that "citizenship contract" that your Mother unknowingly created for you when you were still a baby in your cradle.

Today, we proclaim for all actual Minnesotans that all such undisclosed and inequitable private citizenship contracts imposed upon infants to be null and void and all Legal Presumptions based on the idea that people are or must be either "U.S. Citizens" or "citizens of the United States" or both, to be equally null and void. Your standing as an actual Minnesotan is far more powerful. You will need to correct your political and commercial statuses as soon as possible.

We deny and repudiate the idea that a public trust interest in living flesh and private assets results from any public service or undisclosed private citizenship contract promising future public service. Our Natural Rights are inalienable and cannot be sold, bought, or given away by any contract, much less an unconscionable one.

On September 21, 2025, Anna Von Reitz, Fiduciary for The United States of America, (the unincorporated country) declared that all such illegal latching upon American babies is null and void from the instant such a citizenship contract was deemed to exist and the right of an individual young man or young woman to contract does not extend to the creation of any private contract to break Public and Natural Law.

Nobody can form any valid contract to enslave himself or anyone else in a world where slavery is outlawed.

Two days ago, Anna also declared the British Crown Corporation and its franchises to be operating in Insurrection against International and Public and Natural Law, including but not limited to 10 USC 253 by seeking to impersonate and enslave individual living people via an impersonation scheme based on the aforementioned undisclosed and merely presumed to exist citizenship contracts.

They pull it off by using various styles of a reflection of your full given name coupled with your family name — as in "James Allen of the Homyak family" then became a secondary reflection as 'JAMES ALLEN HOMYAK' but failing to also include the word ESTATE to correctly read 'JAMES ALLEN HOMYAK ESTATE' as the entity for which I am its acting and standing and living Administrator, Trustee, Beneficiary and Executor at this time.

I further declare the British Crown Corporations to be operating private corporate tribunals under color of law and False Pretense of being public courts and having no lawful and legal authorities ever granted to them. They have operated these courts for purposes of coercive racketeering and plundering of non-existent public trusts and public trust interests based on these same undisclosed and otherwise unconscionable foreign citizenship contracts.

The rulings and orders of all such administrative courts aka, Territorial and Municipal CORPORATE tribunals misapplied to living people are null and void for fraud and where any transfer of actual property is involved, these "COURTS" are engaged in racketeering under force and color of law.

The naming styles of at least (8) eight separate distinct reflective and hypothecation entities, as thefts of my identity by these colonial territorial foreign parties might reflect similarly to any of the items in this bullet list:

  • HOMYAK, JAMES ALLEN
  • JAMES ALLEN HOMYAK
  • HOMYAK, JAMES A
  • HOMYAK, JAMES A.
  • JAMES HOMYAK
  • HOMYAK, JAMES
  • J A HOMYAK
  • HOMYAK, J A

This illegal confiscation which may result from attempting to associate me, the actual man, with these fictional creations of man's statutory prerogatives is against our Public Law, our International Law and the Natural Law the people of this country are owed.

We declare the members of the BAR ASSOCIATIONS who have provided the means to set up and enforce these merely presumed to exist foreign citizenship contracts and who are enforcing False Legal presumptions attendant to them, to be in insurrection against the government of this country and this state and we order Mr. Governor Tim Walz to immediately take Notice of this Minnesota Proclamation and to bring his operations into compliance with International, Public and Natural Law and to enforce against the Municipal CORPORATIONS hired by the Territorial "States" to provide them and their U.S. Citizens with separate public services, so as to prevent them from any further illegal and immoral false claims against the American People you are all supposed to serve.

We, the Americans and particularly the Minnesotans our sovereign nation-states, accept all gifts without strings attached and waive all benefits of foreign servitude in any purely or partially imaginary "state" of being or servitude attaching to foreign citizens living in The United States and predominantly on Minnesota.

Members of the Bar Associations who continue to operate corporate tribunals under color of law and who continue to accidentally-on-purpose misaddress Americans as if they were foreign citizens, or intestate public trust "property", are offering continued Insurrection and must be arrested and charged without further delay. Under both Roman Municipal Law and Roman Civil Law, fraud is deadly to all claims, so even under the forms of law they administer, these men and women are found lacking.

We declare all public trust interests alleged to exist as a result of the aforementioned undisclosed private foreign citizenship contracts to be null and void and unenforceable.

Any scheme to deprive any American of any guarantee or right or service provided under any Federal Constitution or under Natural Law, no matter how this end is achieved, is an act of insurrection: 10 USC 253., whether by a foreign state or a domestic enemy, a commercial corporation, or a municipal corporation or any private guild, union, society, association or club — or Roman Municipal Trust — all Principals and Officers stand condemned for fraud and evasion of their own obligation to provide our people with essential government services in "good faith" and must cease and desist the herein described practices and assertions of private foreign citizenship contracts and  foreign public trust interests based on such contracts being insupportably held against Americans and against our Public Interest.

The offending corporate tribunals including all "local" STATE Municipal Corporation Tribunals and CORPORATIONS pretending to be "Judiciary Courts" must be shut down immediately for fraud and racketeering. 

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents, Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS.

Issued by:
James Allen Homyak— Author
The United States of America
Minnesota Assembly Technical Committee
In care of: Box 113
Aitkin, Minnesota 56431
September 23st 2025

 

Details
Category: a government of the people, by the people, and for the people
Hits: 158

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content

Similar Items