Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

Portal Home

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

Hanseatic League - the Law Merchant

 

- old German Law Merchants -

By: James Allen Homyak 

 

America, particularly so named "United States" in Commerce, is run like a gigantic shopping mall. 

 

Inside this fictional shopping mall, EVERYTHING is regarded as "being in commerce" to the point where each shopper is regarded as a "vessel in commerce" to the point where you, as vessels, get to wear all sorts of convenient labels to associate you with any given section of the business of marketing,  sales, delivery, installation and warranty. 

You ultimately get to be labeled as "customer" which means that whatever you buy, it is for the purpose of being resold to another "buyer" at some future point. It generally doesn't matter to proprietors whether you're intending to resell, so the topic is usually moot -- so long as you're a taxpaying buyer and you pay for your purchase. You can become a wholesaler once you've registered your own commercial store front to sell through and collect taxes.

This is where a situation, in such a mega mall, becomes unruly real fast.... 

Let's say that you (in your own body that you own) are out travelling (inside your own car that you own) and you happen to be cited for a minor statutory violation that hasn't physically harmed someone or some property, yet because the "mall cops" are out on "the beat" looking for business transactions to encounter, you must somehow be subject to fines, etc. just for being there. But the first thing that happens, is a mall cop (a corporation asset) approaches you to ask you for the primary three evidences that your vessels somehow belong to the establishment that runs the mall. 

So then you (just like everyone else) quietly produce what is demanded. If the asset encounter happens to be provided such evidences upon demand, you are then going to be at risk of being presented a citation document (the charging instrument) that will either provide you that chance to pay the fine or go to court to defend yourself.

Try for a change to decline providing the demanded proofs that you're standing inside a valid actual jurisdiction and see what happens. You will very likely be trounced upon by any or all the firearm toting backup mall cops that get called in. Your own car will be stolen by them and you can be cuffed and stuffed when you've actually not hurt anyone but the mall cops breached the peace to beat you up!

 

The problem is, that once the mall cop asset thinks it has proven you to be commercial in nature, there is no defense for you at that point. You are automatically standing as accused inside a jurisdiction that is really a complete illusion, because America is actually a free republic and not a democratic shopping mall. Why do lawyers say things like, "Don't sign anything!", or "Don't confess to anything!", or "Don't talk to police without your lawyer present for such encounter."?

It is because truthfully educated lawyers know factually that you have rights to remain quiet, to not self-incriminate, to not pass on, extend or grant any rights from your vessel to their vessel. In so doing you run the risk of being prosecuted, as the prosecutor runs under many maxims of law, the least of which states, "let him who is deceived be deceived" in all situations where you're private, you've harmed no one, yet their systems survives by double and tripple dipping from you when you've become their latest shopper turned victim. Those lawyers/attorneys/judges/courts/banks are all big-talking customer service departments charged with the duty to attach onto your body, your property and your possessions of any value. This is all terribly unruly that "the system" gets this bad.

But hey, Americans have allowed this by keeping our boats floating on the main streams, to those isles we like. Their mall educational department no longer carries non-fiction on the subject -- only fiction and science-fiction remains. There are several specialty retailers at the mall, who can get you the real non-fiction if you figure out where to look and then inquire.

 

What the shopping mall is comprised of is all sorts of ethnic proprietors bent on staying in control of their storefronts (using Hanseatic League tenets) and expecting government assets (armed and dangerous things that move about the place) to protect commerce and hold your feet to the fire.  (statutes, codes, legislation, public policy all designated for those in commerce) 

 

But unbeknownst to you, there is a pre-planned remedy to make way for your own vessels to remain your own, and to end all presumption that you too are an acting mall proprietor. That remedy is found in "Regulation Z" where once you learn how to find and apply it to protect yourself from being mistaken and then  mischaracterized by mall security, and its head office stack of various personnel in commerce, you will be able to communicate your innocence with pre-written dialog.

While you freely move about the mall, you can only be removed if you steal, threaten, hurt anyone or damage the place or break store policy. Otherwise you have the right to do anything you want.  It doesn't cost you anything to be 86'ed out of the mall. But because you like the mall, you're going to respect your access to it. The Germans enjoyed their league practices so much that our money/banking/corporate powers today stole the concepts to run them as a purported government. 

Show me the exit. I go in peace, owed the law of peace. I have no need to be labeled as "customer" or "buyer" or "taxpayer" because I refrain from volunteering into those public commercial capacities. The things I need can be used at home, no receipt necessary for any purpose other than doing a return or exchange, etc. 

 

It's commerce & transportation that will get you on the hook if you render to Ceasar what is Ceasars.  Learn who you are and how to navigate. The Germans haven't gotten much of anything right for a long time -- at least since back in the day.

 

Background-

Creation of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION

At the end of "the so-called Civil War" which has since been determined to have been an illegal commercial mercenary conflict on all sides, that congress reconvened and passed what was called the United States Reorganization act of 1871, also known as the Act to provide a municipal government for the District of Columbia. Their 1871 thing was repealed in 1874, but by hacking away at it, their 1877 thing still seems to be riding the high seas and flagged at home at various inland piracy to this day when we let it.  (hint: flagged)

However, this government was different; it was structured as a foreign owned CORPORATION and called the UNITED STATES!

It even adopted the 1789 Republic constitution but changed only one word. They changed the word Constitution FOR the United States, to the Constitution OF the United States.

Therefore this change made the constitution a possession of the government corporation and NOT the possession of the people.

The only power this government had was to govern over matters of COMMERCE within the District of Columbia. To move forward in acheiving its self-interest objectives, it soon needed its UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE to extend its mall operations to all places outside its limited district by way of introducing a Zone Improvement Program nationwide where all states and municipalities were issued a new mailing ZIP Code and state abbreviation. Example:  MISSOULA, MT 59801

Nowadays, in commerce, you are increasingly prevented from entering your address in proper english place names, nouns, etc. as the USPS has dictated to all in commerce that your entry of your actual name and address gets automatically converted to ALL CAPS AND ALL POSSIBLE ZIP ABBREVIATIONS. 

It also needed a birth registry program to silently conscript new borns into Federal Personhood in order to continue growing itself and funding its massive growth by commercializing all the people as new owned assets to leverage itself financially.  Not only is America a giant mall, but for over 16 decades, all Americans and new immigrants are generalized as "mall products" owned by those various companies (STATE & FEDERAL) and valued for sale or trade to those in the know. 

What we call STATE OF (YOUR STATE), is actually a SUB corporation of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION engaged in matters of commerce. This STATE is not to be confused with the Union State of (your State), which is part of the original pre-Civil war Republic.

Therefore, the UNITED STATES (Corp) is foreign to the Union States as its geographic boundaries are restricted to the land area of the District of Columbia.

This distinction has been recognized in numerous court cases before the U.S. Supreme court. Don't take my word for it, read from the book Cooperative Federalism by Gerald Brown, Ed.D.


Cooperative Federalism

The fact of the matter is, almost ALL government entities are now commercial contracting corporations of some type, complete with a Tax Identification Number (TIN), and a full Dunn and Bradstreet credit report! Don't believe it? Check out the DUNN AND BRADSTREET credit report for the SUPREME COURT! Hurry before D&B is sheilded or taken down from scutiny.

SUPREME COURT D & B CREDIT REPORT

Download a complete copy of the Act of 1871 as printed by the UNITED STATES printing office and read it for yourself.

The Birth of the Second UNITED STATES- The Act of 1871

What you start to get "right" in all of this will be your saving grace. 

 

 

 

Details
Written By: James Allen Homyak
Parent Category: Reading Materials
Category: Unruly States of Affairs in the United States of America
Hits: 323

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content