Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

 

By: Jim Homyak, as himself

If you are wondering about any of this about me...but don't care to ask me directly....how about reading it straight from my mind to yours? Here goes.

Let's open your mind!   Let's free your mind!

Many people regard me as 'crazy jimmy' via the hearsay -- based on the gossip -- about me coming from various sources over the past couple of decades. 

Do I or should I regard any of these sources as factual or authoritative?

No, I should not. I actually don't, won't and cannot. Neither should you. But everyone is entitled to their opinion -- however biased they end up becoming via decades of cognitive dissonance

Prior to my former wife leaving me during the spring time of 2010, I was so driven in business, work and legal matters in order to keep up with an expensive household. I was also driven to live a life of repentance, truth, honesty and reverence for our Lord God, the devine leader of all loving and benevolent faiths. (outside cult-convicted, fake, glad-handing and patronizing ministries)

Back in those days the bank we thought we loaned money from did the deal by making up the money from thin air -- in their accounting system -- based on our promise to pay back over 275% as much over 30 years. We first signed a purchase agreement. Then we signed a Promissory Note. Then a Mortgage. We gave those to the so-called Lender. In a short time, they whipped up the checks based on the new liability balance in their proprietary software system. 

At the end of that 30 year term, our house would not have been worth 2.75 times higher than the purchase price.

I wasn't going to keep falling as the victim. I was a TENANT anyway, since that's what our lovely SYSTEM regards U.S. Citizens in terms of standing. Renting is you. The home closing paperwork showed the wife and I as JOINT TENANTS (which means renter). That's a rank which is no higher than an adjunct franchise token holder bartering in a usufruct administrative relationship (look that one up you smart sane people).

Ask yourself this question about yourself.  "How many years have I spent studying American History, World History, World Wars, Church History, Financial System operations and Popular Culture on top of United States history?"  For me, that is 16 on top of grades 4 through 12. I'd only learned the faked U.S. History throught Public and Christian school education. From then on it's all fake news. We are each responsible for making real news which is then our truth.

Ask yourself this question:  "How much do I know about the important and vast difference between American history and UNITED STATES history and on top of that the actual Minnesota history vs. the STATE OF MINNESOTA history?" 

You won't ever know the truth about any of these unless you decide to study by yourself. Period.

How about these questions: "Do I really know or care where home loan funding comes from?"   "Don't you know that Federal Reserve Notes are below zero because they each (each dollar) represent Debts to repay?"

About now, under Joke Biden, you are realizing your dollar is worth near zero, and the fake press and fake media tells you we all owe 34 trillion that can never be repaid so like it and pay it for the next 500 years. Yeah, right.  The real truth is the actual American people are owed over 500 trillion in national credit which is being kept off of our "supposed to be honest accounting" balance sheets by the Department of Defense. 

Here's one, "Do I ever want to run a successful home-based business?"

There used to be great opportunity.  Now you have to get more creative than ever.

And there are all of these, "How are we going to raise these kids and get them out on their own -- in a world that wants to own and control them too and force them into poverty -- and/or turn our sons or daughters into the opposite sex or drug them up?"   "Let's send them to schools that won't even tell us that they're helping our boys and girls to become promiscuous and bi-curious?"  "Our daughter wants to become a boy with the help of our school social worker quietly behind our backs and yet we've raised her to know who she is, but we haven't got a leg to stand on as the school district will contact CPS to take her from our home and family if we threaten to put a stop to this insanity -- all to protect her?"

Let me ask this question of myself:  "Why am I so different from everyone else?"

I had learned about what's going on (world-wide) that will terribly affect everyone in the years ahead, and, the discovery woke me up super fast. So fast that you all thought I was nuts, or you believed the hearsay and saw me walk away.  Ha! THE JOKE IS ON YOU!  Check out this Roman Catholic high ranking fellow as he tries to alert everyone back in 2021 (about 158 years too late).

Rather than being 1 million percent NUTS, I decided that stealing from me and lying to me are completely over with.

So now, these days, I can honestly agree to being a very small percent of nuts -- maybe even lower on the nuts scale than you are. But are we a danger to each other? I doubt that very much. Not unless you've had the death shots -- more on that a bit later in this essay.

My degree of going nuts is proven in people whose adrenal and renal systems are broke down -- or destroyed by toxic exposures.

Here is what happened to me after ten years into my so-called happy home ownership:

  1. During 2007, the wife saw a FOX News report about our so-called bank. Regulators discovered financial fraud that was to unwind the entire home financing deal for everyone involved. 

  2. During a couple months of my spare time, I'd used the internet/web to get a LOT more info than what the news was reporting. The American faked franchise and corporatized foreign government was conning everyone with their TARP (toxic assets) program. The U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve structured a settlement to pay-off all the crooks to keep them from failing (too big to fail), but still leaving homeowners on the hook for their full amount due, after granting a zero balance for the cronies; there was no relief planned and a full balance still due for us sheeple who didn't know what was going on. The home buyers were the blame as ponzi scheme victims without a clue. We were said to all be in over our heads by purchasing a home that will soon be way beyond our means -- thus a troubled asset. 

  3. Totally unrelated: I'd gotten a phone call in early 2008 from an old friend who asked for my help in converting his workbook series into a website. We were convinced our investor contacts in Colorado were going to fund us with $300k by autum 2008 to make a new business.

  4. By July 2008 I was able to leave a company where I had worked for just over two years. That was a $52K average paying job I'd left with no real benefits or pension to look forward to. Both the wife and I had to work full time if possible to make ends meet. 

  5. By Sept 2008 the entire housing market crashed. Our investor cancelled. This left me without hopes of earning $72k at a home-based business. Taking smaller jobs left my earings way down. Also along with the market crashing, the twin cites area had 32,000 computer people looking for work. 85% of them had a higher level of education than I had. Do you see where this is going? Spending into our overdraft protection every month.

  6. By late 2008 I had discovered the man behind organiclaws.org and also the man behind livinglies.me  and several people behind sedm.org and I became a student to their education courses. Serious now, I had waken up to something that has been slowly and gradually ruing this entire country -- all our farms, all our factories, all our industries, all our families for upwards of 200 years. From 1824 through 2024 we Americans are in a death spiral. I figured this out for myself long ago. I can now articulate the many situations better than anyone...   to such degree THAT I MUST BE CRAY CRAY, huh?   Yeah. That's the ticket.  

  7. By early 2009 I had my mortgage and home closing package of papers in hand, due to over 60 issues (times two by including both the wife and I) I had found based on the same kinds of bank errors and fraud that was being discovered and paid off behind closed doors via TARP by the American taxation swindle. I had taken our document packet to a Lakeville area financial fraud investigator. He carefully combed through all of these over a month's time (huge pile of other investigation he had going) and we together had taken the package to an area law firm. The law firm concluded that, "James, you have got over 65 counts of constructive fraud, identity theft, fraud in the inducement, fraud in the factum, failure to disclose the true nature of the home financing, and more. Said quickly, it was to have been a lawsuit approaching 4 million dollars. A lawsuit required $880 dollars in court filing fees to initiate with all parties involved."  

  8. By April 2009 the lawyer advised how to rescind our financing using the bank's own procedures. We did all of that. Then the smaller bank was acquired by a significantly larger bank -- and via TARP Round 2 all of the entire amount of indebtedness above us was paid off, between banks, but the lawyer was able to prove that what should have occured was a resturcturing for the homeowners as well. This debt restructuring never happened. The truth of the home financing funding source was kept hidden. That lawyer was on a first-come-first-served basis. We were delayed by over six months. We went on "stop pay" in lieu of receiveing back a fairly sizable sum in order to refinance.  

  9. Due to the bank breaking more laws, we had then been led to initiate a different lawsuit at the state and federal levels. That is when I had gotten so busy in research and writing, the nescient wife went nuts on me, thinking I didn't love her anymore. Much lower income, working at home, falling behind on everything, etc. becoming a disconnected father to the kids, etc.  

  10. I was at a stage of absolutely refusing to play their games and be had by THEM/Them/them. (a page from my Dad's play book) In that state of mind, the house wasn't worth it. The job wasn't worth it. The wife and family as confused and misled as they'd all become in life, wasn't worth it. I was simply left to contemplate the sin circling all around me. I wasn't going to change anyone but myself. I wasn't going to attempt to unwind everyone's wrongs when the scope of it all was that massive. Even the attorney for "the Bank/Pretender Lender" broke the news to me: "Your use of the LEGAL ALL CAPS NAME FRANCHISE (aka HOMYAK, JAMES A) is also included in the list of fraud that the judge will hear that you've been committing."  

  11. Long story short:   When someone is wanting to, ready to, setup to and encourged by others to walk away from you, LET THEM! 

  12. Somewhere during spring time 2010, around April fool's day, I was invited by a family member to hop in the car for a ride to the county psych ward.  Yay me!  The mess in my life DID NOT turn me crazy. My decision to move on has left a whole lot of people to their own naturally misguided time spent listening to opinionated wrong-headed people who still to this day have their head in the sand. 

  13. None of the people in my life would be to blame for my kidney failure of 2019 through 2024.  I doubt very much I would be in this condition had I not lived easy and carefree in the western states from 2010 through 2019. I was living the dream with a new outlook. The past is past. Your lives go from this point forward. 

  14. Now we are in 2024. My phone doesn't ring from any of the over 250 people knowing of me via family. I see people who come outside, for instance, from a get together, wondering if "CRAZY" is nearby some where. Well how about this:  If I am spending time near such people, then I am wasting my time -- AND THEY KNOW IT! That's why you may only see me for a short time. Then it is exit stage right -- I am out of there.

  15. Don't come around me and don't invite me anywhere near anyone who believes in the COVID (debaucle) as some great government issued potion to keep you safe. If you've had those death shots, you've said your  "so long" to me. Or you can say it once news travels about this little gem of a "let em' go" story. 

  16. Two of my best friends passed away in January and June this year. Being conservative, prepared and well-educated people, they had both told me that the levels of schizophrenia and psychosis that I'd been accused of living in denial with, by my own family, is actually quite natural to happen to people who know as much as I do. Yet I've actively been doing something about it rather than balling up and crawling under a rock to sulk. Here we are at a shory essay which I've put onto my web portal -- a technology that few people can even grasp, let alone read or comprehend.  So, good luck with all of this. 

Now as for this story and those doubters in my realms; those who snicker; those who play dumb; those who blow me off; those who are confused; those who've seen enough bullshit happening lately in their own lives; those who see me now 14 years into that future (2010 to 2024); my best and most loving and sane advice I can give you about these Unruly States of Affairs in the United States of America is this:

YOU HAD BETTER WAKE UP!

AND GET YOUR STATUS CORRECTED! 

You haven't got much time. You don't need me! Do it for yourself! 

So long everyone... if you ever see me again, it would be too soon. 

 

Autographed By: ole' Jimbo 

 

P.S. As one of the top 350 most sane and accredited people on Minnesota, as of the time of this writing, know this: We have over 350 men and women (not as PERSONS) now standing on the land and soil jurisdiction. This time next year we plan for 3,500 or more.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of DebtThe Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN