Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

Imagine The Outrage

By: James Allen Homyak©
      Drafted into publication June 16, 2022

 

You might be one who works on themself every day to stay healthy. Some of you may be or have known people like the man I am writing about in this growing story.

This is especially for those of you who have frequent lab results that put your mind at ease - nearly always. Negative lab tests are a great thing.

You might be one who has little need for expensive pharmaceutical treatments; very little other work needed aside from your routine care and your general dentistry. Aside from eating, sleeping, eliminating and so forth -- you know, the standard stuff in a healthy household where dirt and mess can really build your immune system. Don't laugh it's true.

Now add to that, this man did years of dilligent self-study and had personal testimonials for the many forms of all-natural and prudent ways to stay healthy...  and ways to force "disease" to simply bounce off because of strong natural immunity after eating organic and grass-fed meat and organic vegetables.

FACT CHECKER - Is that even possible? Such information may violate community standards.

Now, for this poor man, as of late:

A middle-aged man died from things that had built up in his body (who's body?) only to be labeled as:

Patient deceased, massive heart failure.

As for the family, other realities began coming to the surface as the man's people tried in vain to get clarity from the situtation. Things going on with the man became a growing list of stories that sounded like a series of chain reactions were in play. "High fluid buildup. His system couldn't sustain it. His BP was over the top. Sadly he couldn't be resusitated, etc. Very sorry. When the final Hospital Resident came out, with last blood work readings which had shown high levels to indicate his kidneys had failed. As they urged to see more test results it became a medical records issue for the deceased, etc. Cause for such results as high creatinine, high potassium, high sodium, high calcium were set aside because the man's heart failed. They were more interested in tests to deem a cause with the heart.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

Before his passing, the man had been turned down for getting a surgery that would have been expected to help the man to reduce or eliminate his time consuming repeat permanent care session. That alone could have helped him get to dealing with his disabilty and so forth. That could be great, right?

 

Imagine the Outrage!

Now I believe he died due to some hospital regulation, brought about by some polititians, some health advisers, some corporations, etc. as it was immediately determined that as a prerequisit treatment before surgery the man would have to undergo (turns out it's experimental genetic therapy) to prevent something from happening with a less than 8% likelihood.  The man did his math and declined getting a shot. Because it went into the man's record, it was established that he wouldn't receive his organ. No point being on their wait list, right?

Imagine the Outrage!

That "something" turned out to be SOME THING SO DEADLY (like a very strong pneumonia which can be deadly but can also be treated and resolved by early treatment protocol) that he would need a series of at least one or the other of (pick your poison) vendors's formulations granted an EUA due to a created pandmemic - oh turn on the fact checking again!

 

Imagine the Outrage!

Yes!!!

As of May 29, 2022, over 526 million (7.51% of global population) had insider-confirmed cases and over six million deaths have been reported globally from the insiders. This thing has apparently been deadly to over 6,000,000 people, a mere 0.09% of our planetary population. Less than one tenth of one percent!  I mean really? I mean inject them?  For what?  Spelled backwards, this thing has some scarry meaning. Spelled either way, it had to have come from some much older plans.

Sad to see a man here who had endured so much, because of a controlled and created threat, to so few, but huge profit for so many, foreign people, who aren't even American!  What?  Yes, they're foreign.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

He lost his life before even getting a chance to try his new SOT. Instead his contrived heart issues and lack of agreement to partake in "New York's finest" or "Massachusetts' top shelf" to leave him with a rather tiny vaccine history got him denied. Denied for who, you ask?  Denied for them. It's all about them. They denied themselves.  Denied themselves what? Payouts?  They have to "perfect their exit" from your thing they created that you've stood-in for.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

That thing is the "ALL CAPS NAME" that they make up using the like characters given by your mother. She gives them the name, Henry William (a monster is made when names are joined). That is the bouncing baby boy who grows up to be old enough the comprehend the words,  Henry!   Henry William!  Those are his homosapien roots.  Eventually "I am Henry William Moore, that's who I is."  You are, to your family and friends, dear Henry. But to the corporations, you have to also be one of those likenesses to do this thing called commerce with them, Henry.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

In commerce the names have changed to protect the lords. Henry, to them you are HENRY WILLIAM MOORE and can you spot the difference?  It's a commercialism that requires your participation with LEGAL people using LEGAL names under the dominion of LEGAL SYSTEMS which are patented, coyrighted and trademarked. The Pope and Queen and Lords don't want to pay back what is owed to us. So there sits trillions of our dollars in gold and valuables, sealed away in vaults.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

Today, we the people are getting the following cascade of name changes thrown at us since a very early age.

Noteably since age 16 just before our beginning to drive use an automobile to drive to work travel from point a to point b.

Have you ever noticed that name change? Do you let it slide after hearing the plethora of excuses?

We start our lives with our given name. Then we inherit the family name along with it. We humanize ourselves once we join the two parts of the name.  (given) + (inherited)  that is where color of man pours in. It's humanism to be so human. Color (hue) of man. A visible creation does not control an invisible creator.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

Illustration of these noted name style variations, and why:

John Doe, John Mark Doe, John M. Doe, John M Doe, J Doe, and the like which are our given and inherited family names.

In coming into working age, the name is changed in style with companies and governments

JOHN MARK DOE, JOHN M DOE, JOHN M. DOE, JOHN DOE.

I've since discovered the meaning of all of this legal fiction.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

The underpinnings are:

  • Non Profit (eg. Church)
  • Domestic (corporate municipal enclaves of government people)
  • Foreign (not a part of this land, geographically or politically)

Out of the five to seven identified American citizenship classes, it is possible to see which one of the three classes of "CITIZEN" and of the four classes of "everyone else" are which based on the way the name is addressed in mailings from such entities which are Foreign, Domestic or Non-Profit.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

As author of this content, I am Jim Homyak for a nick name and James Allen of the Homyak family for my privately chartered sentient living being name.

Those are my private American birthright given+inherited names. Nobody altered them to our knowledge. Want a bet? Oh, did they ever. They change my name to six other variations, at least, without a name change on record anywhere.  I didn't even include all the "Lastname, First name" varables.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

 

Jim Homyak (at least a living man, definitely not a confessed U.S. Citizen) (a foreigner to D.C.)

James Homyak (a declared non-citizen state national who doesn't serve that government)(a creditor)

James Allen Homyak (a state beneficiary who is owed money, but who is not their registered voter)

James A. Homyak (a state-created domestic transmitting utility debtor, serving government as trustee)

JAMES HOMYAK (U.S. CITIZEN) (PUBLIC PERSON) (COMMERCIAL ENTITY) (OWED MONEY) (a trustee but also a not-for-profit one)

JAMES A. HOMYAK (a PUBLIC domestic transmitting utility debtor, legal fiction, expected to pay a debt twice or more) (a trustee)(a estate, managed by a STATE, concocted in a ALL CAPS likeness to this name)

JAMES ALLEN HOMYAK (a fictional public instrumentality created for government to leverage as a private asset and owed the return of assets to each actual donor as a part of the new deal) (a trustee)(a probate trust in this name, proceeds from a bond fund in the market are owed plus damages for theft of identity)

Here we are trying to buy a house and we don't even realize the bank paperwork is trying to cover up the mischief of states by getting your paperwork all filled out with several of the various name styles (we don't even notice as we whisk through the stack in second flat) and then getting you to "Sign" a one in the same agreement. New read this.  WHAT!!!!!!?????.  But those 17 styles to my name are not one in the same. I am me.  Who is banging the buck to stand me up under all the false pretenses?  So much so that the Bank Attorney accuses me of fraud so bad that the Judge would love to hear it. But hear me call Bank Fraud for what it is?  Good luck on that.

 

Imagine the Outrage!


Now, this whole mess that the man above went though makes me wonder and if people would even bother to read this information that I am thinking of inputting below.

Imagine the Outrage!


What organ?

Turns out it was his kidney function (that alone!) that he wanted restored. He was never having any heart problems. His family member went on to say that just wasn't in his make up. He had been hospitalized and that place even had him nearly placed on meds and the vent. But he rejected that so they changed their tone with him to one who wasn't going to drink their Kool-Aid.   He knew it was his pneumonia that flared up again. I could have asked questions for days!  He was not about to permit them to enter any Z28.x ICD-10 Codes  updates into his Medical Record either. If fact them so doing will trigger Privacy Act of 1974 violations and HIPPA violations and other false claims in commerce charges with damages tolling. 

 

Imagine the Outrage!


What medication did the man reject in the Hospital after they tested him positive for that thing? 

Remdesivir (that alone!) is what they would give the man instantly if he had ever contracted a serious case of this thing (that won't kill 210,000,000 people because it goes away if you take care of yourself and stay out of the hospitals). The D-dimer test would show if the man had elevated clotting. Did they run that test on him and tell his family? Doubtful!  Did they check his vitamin D levels?  Are you kidding!

Imagine the Outrage!


What shot? The two richest most prominent vendors funded into existence by "this and other acting governments"

Imagine the Outrage!


Why stop him from getting his kidney? 

Oh, he needed experimental stuff injected into his veins (a product only on stage because of experimental treatment emergency use authorization) and he needed more stuff injected to make his body not reject his "new part" and to actually stop his immune system medically. (oh, Gee... "We scientists, let's see how we can suppress someone's natural immune system?") Turns out this "anti-rejection drug" thing had come on stage under much the same pharmaceutical/industrial process does things many decades ago.

Imagine the Outrage!


Upon further examination, why have the medical business people gotten so well "legally" protected and "financially" protected that they are automatically not at fault and fully exonerated by lawyers/judges/insurance companies when the new injection could not possibly be the cause of the man's death?  Fact Checkers?

Imagine the Outrage!


So when I get started on outrageous things being done to people, I start my research gears turning. I invest my time. I come up with this list from over 18 months time. I did it and will do it all in peace, because I am peaceful.  I will not become violent within my outrage, like these corporatized government entities do to people around this planet by blowing in their doors and jamming big intimidating guns in their faces.

 

Imagine the Outrage!

 

more "legal fiction" coming soon

 

Outrage Imagined


In the News for April 2022:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/


Published online 2022 Apr 22. doi: 10.25259/SNI_150_2022
PMCID: PMC9062939
PMID: 35509555

COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?

 

 

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is SNI-13-167-inline001.jpg

 

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[,,] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/  (see it to believe it)

 


People need to go and get informed for a change. Not from the evening news.
 
 

 

 

Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19

1 June 2022

Edition 94

 

Overview

Globally, the number of new weekly cases has continued to decline since a peak in January 2022. During the week of 23 until 29 May 2022, over 3.3 million cases were reported, an 11% decrease as compared to the previous week.

The number of new weekly deaths also continues to decline, with over 9 600 fatalities reported, representing a 3% decrease as compared to the previous week.

 

As of 29 May 2022, over 526 million confirmed cases and over six million deaths have been reported globally.

 

In this edition, we provide updates on circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs).

WHO Team
Emergency Response
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of DebtThe Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN