Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

By: James Allen Homyak

"A right is any action that does not bring harm upon another." Said my good friend Steve. I think he is right.

But after your birth, who claimed your body as property? What harm is there in not telling a parent? Did something or someone have the right to presume upon you as a baby?

It is very likely that your father did not go to hospital administration and say, "I am here taking my baby and its mother home with me, where I provide them guardianship in "Pater Familis" to self-govern in pursuit of happiness. Thank you for your assistance. Have a nice day." 

Instead, they discharged the mother and child with the birthing parent most often being the one who informed on the baby's existence to a hospital administrator standing bedside with paper, a pen and a clipboard. So now hospitals generally ignore the father other than to smile and give congrats. The father is not told the important step of claiming his new born property and receiving it at the dock.

Now I am going to borrow a lot from a great author, Anna Von Reitz, and share this.

She explains about the Roman Civil Law adopted by the Municipal United States Government. That means over 185,000 individual branch locations which are all franchised in under (and within) a District whereby they are now known as the municipal city administration, county administration and state administration.  Aka:  City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota., etc. on and on.
 
They are literally running on the law of Rome, more than two thousand years old, all scribed in Latin. Many of the latin phases are in legal precendent world wide. 
 
A right is the right to be informed how the evil scam of a birth registry/financial system has been put together. Now they have Gold, Oil, Drugs, Cash, Guns and Cover and are getting their babies too.
 
Under Roman Civil Law, a woman can own property (such as her own children) only so long as there is a male head of household willing to claim those children as his responsibility. 
 
Otherwise, the Municipal Government views her children as very valuable unclaimed property --- presumed to be unwanted bastards --- slaves, in other words.  
 
So that said, after my parents divorced I lived with mom. She had an inkling there was mischief going on, having worked in Real Estate. She warned me before her death in 1995, to be either Republican or nothing. She knew the State was up to something. She was convinced there was no point in registering to vote. Local governments quietly fully changed over to UCC governed for-profit corporations in the 1960's and it took people five years to notice the technocracy getting started. And they will claim the children of unprotected women as WARDS OF THE STATE. From that point in a child's life there will be a number of steps the child is expected to take as a good law abiding citizen under a contrived democracy, in a lost republic. 
 
Now my goal with producing the Unruly States of Affairs website is to show how I take back myself and get myself restored so I can then boot back up the stopped original American government at the state house. My mother had no idea what she was headed for, and there was no real help from government. Instead they allowed my mother to never be told that I was considered a bastard child.
 
As a result, divorced women, actual unwed mothers, and widows with children all need to find trustworthy men to stand in the place of Pater Familis with respect to their children. This Paternal Guardian can be and if possible should be the Grandfather, Uncle, Brother, or other relative who is a man of good character and of age and otherwise able to support a family.  Just be sure to record your copies of everything in your big old family bible. Record your children, your pets, your business, your property, your investments, your plans.
 
In a pinch, a Godfather can serve, or even a family friend, but someone has to fill those empty shoes or the children are at risk under Municipal Law. They are at risk of being governed when it is your job to govern them in the way they should go.
 
It is this same antique form of law that allows slavery and peonage to exist in the modern world. Only now, our names are made into "things" of at least three sorts, and we have these things run silently by others who tend to business under foreign status.
 
For these and other reasons, Roman Civil Law should not exist in the modern world, but it does and it is still one of the most common forms of law on a planetary basis.  Go figure --- and deal with this information.  
 
You are being mistaken and impersonated as a Municipal citizen of the United States, subject to Roman Civil Law.  Then you are demanded to present the first three items a peace officer asks, all in order to establish whether or not he has jurisdiction over you. He does not automatically have force and effect over you unless you are injuring someone or damaging property.
 
Yes, we can accuse the perpetrators of fraud and hope to prove it, but under Roman Civil Law, you are guilty until proven innocent ---- and they get to set the standard of proof and they will move the goal posts too.  
 
So.... it's best to know what you are up against and have your ducks in order to establish your standing and ownership interest in your property assets, and it is also best if you realize that under this ancient form of law, pledging,  your children are property assets belonging to you, their parents, until they reach the age of majority. You will find my quest to accomplish this for myself in "Administrative Record" my new manuscript online here at Unruly States of Affairs > Books link.
 
Under Roman Civil Law, people can still be owned as property.  Minor children are property by definition -- either of their parents/family --- or the STATE. When no claim is made, the state assumes its claim and sets up a fund balance of maximum debt to set off using the child's future worth to the khzarian property system run by the Rothschilds (Queen) and the Rockefellars (Pope) and their enforcement agents make sure "employers" withhold from "paychecks" (securities instruments for debt objects) and "taxpayers" file returns and pay the balance, etc. as if they had a gain.
 
Slavery is wrong, we all know it's wrong, and it has been outlawed worldwide since 1926, but nonetheless, under Roman Civil Law it persists locally and hasn't been eradicated.  Until it is, and until other forms of law replace it, the Roman Civil Law poses a threat to anyone who can be ensnared. Debt slavery to odious debt is wrong, too.
 
We are certainly not condoning any of this and don't advocate it or naturally stand under Roman Civil Law at all ---- nonetheless, it is the law of one of our Federal Subcontractors, and we have to be aware of it and ready to defend against it --- first by denying their assumption that we are citizens of their version of "United States" and second, by being prepared to rebut their ownership claims under their own law. 
 
Having someone on the record to stand as Pater Familis is wise, as it discourages the Vermin from attacking you and your children in the first place.  They can't assume that your children are "fatherless" and without support, the most common excuse they use to claim them and send their "agents" ---- "Child Protective Services" --- to seize upon your kids.  
 
This advice applies to people who have "married" under a civil marriage license as much as it does to actual unwed mothers and divorcees and widows ---- get a separate claim, a Baby Record (sometimes called a Baby Deed) on the Public Record, with both a Father or Paternal Guardian and Mother on the record.  Such "civil marriages" do not establish official paternity and don't have the lawful and legal standing of wedlock.  That is, you can be married and your husband is still not legally presumed to be the father of your children until he steps up and says so.  You also need to clearly establish the birthright political status of your child as an American State National for their sake.  
 
Don't let anyone assume anything about your political status --- declare it, and don't let your children go undeclared, either. 
 
Admiralty Law is another ancient form of law that is legendarily prone to corruption, which is what led to the Admiralty Courts in Great Britain being dismembered and restricted in the mid-1700's.  Only four subjects were left to the Admiralty Courts after this great restructuring --- seaman's wages, hypothecation of debt, maritime salvage claims, and bottomry bonds. 
 
Out of this meager remaining authority, the Admiralty Courts have managed to spread worldwide corruption on an unprecedented scale, by attaching "Special Admiralty Rules" to the Roman Civil Law already discussed and misapplying Admiralty Law on shore.  
 
The Perpetrators have "supposed" that, as we haven't declared our own political status in public, they can use their own "discretion" to determine our identity and political status for us, and proceed however they please, using whatever form of law suits their purpose --- which is to collect war reparations for the British King. 
 
From their perspective, we are "ships" --- thanks to a presumed British Territorial "Citizenship" that accrues to British Territorial Persons at birth --- and as such, we are subject to maritime (commercial) salvage as bankrupt franchises of prior government corporations.  So they seize upon our good names and estates and make false claims and false presumptions about us and our government, and there is nothing to prevent this headlong self-interested spate of lying, because we have been left completely in the dark and unable to object as a result. 
 
The entire British Territorial Internal Revenue Service scam rests upon their undisclosed use of the word "Taxpayer" as a legal term defined as a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service ---- thus bringing the subject matter of the Admiralty Courts --- seaman's wages --- to bear.  
 
They also speculate that the bankrupt franchise "Persons" that they operate "in our names" are subject to salvage and hypothecation of debt against the "wreck" --- that is, the bankrupted British Territorial Person -- and the Owners of that wreck, who are presumed to be the Americans these British Territorial franchise corporations are named after.  
 
Imagine that someone named an actual ship after you, the jolly HMS John Doe American?  
And then proceeded to wreck and bankrupt and salvage this ship?  Imagine that they have charged you for all this "service" they've done salvaging the wreck that they created?  Plus, they have seized upon the cargo this "ship" was carrying?  
 
Now you have an idea of what these criminals have been pulling on the clueless American General Public in their Admiralty Courts.  Technically, they have been addressing their own bankrupt corporate franchises, not addressing the similarly-named Americans at all.  And obviously, bankrupt British Territorial corporate franchises have no guarantees under The Constitution of the United States of America, so they have evaded their constitutional obligations to the Americans, too.  
 
This is why the Admiralty Courts were destroyed in the 1750's, but unfortunately, the Brits saw an advantage in preserving this nasty little court concession for precisely these and similar fraud schemes ---- and so these frauds of impersonation and unlawful conversion have continued and flourished even though they have been officially outlawed since 1702, and the British Government has deliberately continued to profit from these fraud and personage schemes with malice aforethought, as we see in the Naval Agency and Distributions Act of 1864. 
 
Both of these ancient forms of "Law" --- the Roman Civil Law and the Admiralty Law --- need to be torn asunder and  reformed on a worldwide basis, as both are being manipulated to promote criminal mischief and injustice on a worldwide scale. 
 
We should not be limited in this reform or coerced to substitute other repugnant forms of law such as Administrative Law intended to manage the internal affairs of corporations, or Sharia Law which is a codification enforcing Muslim religious mandates, or Noahide Law which is a simpler and even more Draconian form of Admiralty Law or Rules of Law which are intended to govern the courts.  
 
We need new law forms that are simple, easy to understand, and easy to obey for the common good.  There is no reason to entertain the insanity of over 80 million codes, regulations, and statutes, which nobody can rightly interpret, know, obey, enforce, or pay for. 
 
We, as a planetary community, must address the havoc and injustice that the application and misapplication of these ancient forms of law have caused.  We must additionally address the results of these misuses and abuses of law and make new choices and develop new forms of law to promote justice and honest administration of local government and business functions. 
 
I have stared this Beast in the face and thought long and hard about it, and can find no better standards than the most ancient of all laws on Earth --- to honor our Creator, to honor freewill, to cause no harm, and to treat others as we would like to be treated ourselves. 
 
Avoiding harm to others would become profitable. Respecting the privacy and property rights of others would be normal.  And you wouldn't need entire huge libraries to define and prove what is simply right or simply wrong.  All you would need is a jury of twelve people without profit motives and their heads screwed on.

 

Browse through this website, gaining new information. Take some of the phrases you see, and do searching of your own. Build your history of setting yourself free.


After all, it is your right.

Now, let's hope that my marvelous love letter that I write to that future sweetheart of mine does not bring her any harm. 


Rights as a man or woman vs. rights as a person

Understanding the rights you have as a man versus your rights as a person involves distinguishing between gender-specific rights and universal human rights. While many rights are applicable to all individuals regardless of gender, some may be influenced by societal norms or legal frameworks that can vary based on jurisdiction. It remains highly important to distinguish precisely which sort of person being discussed in terms it its rights. 


Universal Human Rights


  1. Right to Life and Liberty: Every individual has the inherent right to life, liberty, and security of person.

  2. Right to Equality: All individuals are entitled to equal protection under the law without discrimination.

  3. Right to Privacy: Everyone has the right to privacy in their personal and family life, home, and correspondence.

  4. Freedom of Thought and Expression: Individuals have the right to hold opinions without interference and express them freely.


Specific Rights Related to Gender


While many rights are universal, certain legal frameworks may provide additional protections or considerations based on gender:

  1. Men's Health Rights: In some jurisdictions, there may be specific health programs targeting men's health issues (e.g., prostate cancer screening).

  2. Paternity Leave: Some countries offer paternity leave policies that recognize men's roles in child-rearing.


Various kinds of Property Rights


Private Property Rights

  • Ownership: As an individual, you have the right to own property, which includes real estate, personal belongings, and intellectual property.

  • Transferability: You can sell or transfer your property unless restricted by law (e.g., zoning laws).

  • Protection from Unlawful Seizure: Your property cannot be taken without due process of law.

Intellectual Property Rights

  • Copyrights: Protects original works of authorship such as books, music, and art.

  • Patents: Grants exclusive rights to inventors for their inventions for a limited time.

  • Trademarks: Protects symbols, names, and slogans used to identify goods or services.


Legal Rights


Right to Remain Silent

  • This is a legal right often associated with criminal proceedings; it allows individuals not to testify against themselves during interrogation or trial.

Other Legal Protections

  • Due Process: The right to fair treatment through the normal judicial system.

  • Freedom from Discrimination: Protection against discrimination based on race, gender, religion, etc.


Summary Table of Rights


Type of Right Description
Right to Life  Inherent right to live without unlawful deprivation
Right to Equality  Equal protection under the law
Right to Privacy  Protection from unwarranted intrusion into personal life
Private Property Rights  Ownership and control over personal property
Intellectual Property Rights  Protection for creations of the mind
Right to Remain Silent  Legal right not to incriminate oneself 
Due Process   Fair treatment in judicial proceedings
No Discrimination  Protection against unfair treatment for any characteristics
Right to Clear Conscience   Protection against cross over into disrupting peace of mind 

 

In conclusion, while many rights are universally applicable regardless of gender—such as private property rights and intellectual property rights—certain aspects may vary based on societal norms or specific legal protections afforded in different jurisdictions. It is essential for individuals to understand both their universal human rights and any additional rights that may apply specifically due to their gender or other factors.

The probability that this answer is correct is high given its reliance on established legal principles and human rights conventions.

Authoritative Sources

  1. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights [UN.org]

  2. U.S. Constitution - Bill of Rights [ConstitutionCenter.org]

  3. World Intellectual Property Organization - Understanding Copyright [WIPO.int]

  4. USOA - Unruly States of Affairs [USOA.com

 

 

 

 

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of DebtThe Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN