How many of you know, that there are 5 classes of people in America? (With a new bonus class as of 9/4/24)
Wouldn't it make sense then, that each class has things it can and cannot own, such as land or an estate?
By: James Allen Homyak
March 25, 2023
Let's define the five as different political statuses with a unique estate to each class.
I recently found a document about the issue of citizenship (and non-citizenship) and that writing, by Anna Von Reitz, described the five political statuses that people in America can adopt consciously or be born into or naturalized into.
In short these are:
(A) State National (such as a Indiana baby born upon Indiana)
(B) State Citizenship (such as a Montana ranch owner, owning land on Montana)
(C) Federal United States Citizen (American but not soley one of the first two classes)
(D) Territorial U.S. Citizen (British citizen, residing in the U.S. a subject of English royalty still)
(E) Municipal "citizens of the United States" (Papist, meaning under the Vatican's Pope).
Now that you have been alerted that there are five different political statuses, you also must now comprehend the fact that each status has different roles, rules, and benefits, which in sum total are given a designation "estates" in law and commerce.
When a child is born at an American Hospital and registered in a STATE, the contrived citizenship that is presumed upon the child is C, D or E based upon prevailing factors. The administration has no clue how to do anything else besides its well established policy rooted in The Maternity Act.
State Nationals (A) hold their estate in The United States, and populate the National Jurisdiction of the soil in each State of the Union.
State Citizens (B) hold their Estate in The United States of America, and populate the International Jurisdiction of the Land and Sea on behalf of their particular State of the Union.
Federal United States Citizens (C) are Americans who adopt Federal Dual Citizenship and retain their State National political status while working as employees of the States of America, the Confederation of States of States, like The State of California, that have been "missing" from 1860 to 1998, and considered lost at sea and/or regarded as vessels in commerce.
Regardless of the condition, existence or non-existence of the Confederation of States of State to administer these functions, the Federation of States is competent to do so and has done so. These Federal United States Citizens conduct international business in behalf of The United States of America, and may work on either the land or the sea. An example of this political status are the Continental Marshals (land) and their counterparts the United States Marshals (sea).
Territorial U.S. Citizens (D) are typically Americans who were born in the Insular States like Guam and Puerto Rico, or who adopted such citizenship as a condition of their employment in the U.S. Military or acquired it as dependents of someone in the U.S. Military. The British Monarch continues to hold some part and influence over the U.S. Military as a result of agreements making the British Monarch the Trustee of Americans "on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways".
Municipal "citizens of the United States" (E) are often Americans but may come from anywhere on the globe, who have adopted such citizenship as a condition of their employment for the Federal Civil Service, as a dependent of a Federal Civil Service worker, or as a Municipal Employee or native of Washington, DC, or they may have adopted such political status as a religious obligation. The Municipal Government of the District of Columbia is a theocracy run by the Roman Catholic Church doing business as "the" United States.
That Municipal Government has done business as a commercial corporation since 1878 and it is currently in the process of settling its Chapter 7 bankruptcy and liquidation.
Key Points:
(1) All three species of Federal Employees cannot own land in America; they can only "reside" in the States on a temporary basis until such time as they retire and return to their birthright political status or become naturalized State Nationals. If they are Americans "seeking temporary employment" as Federal Citizens, their land assets are held for them in State Trusts during their Tour of Duty or Foreign Assignment;
(2) Federal Employees are not owed any protections under the Constitutions governing their political status; they are subject to the Constitutions when on the land and soil of the States -- [that's why its called "The Law of the Land"] meaning that they have to obey and respect the Constitutional Guarantees owed to American State Nationals and American State Citizens, but have no such protections themselves, because their political statuses are created by the Constitutions (there are three (3) Constitutions, one for each kind of Federal Government Subcontractor -- American, Territorial, Papist).
(3) As a State National (A) or a State Citizen (B), you may lawfully inherit assets from family members of yours who happened to be Federal (C) or Territorial (D) or Municipal (E) "residents" at the time of their death, without being a subject to the same Estate and Probate legislation that is applicable to their C, D or E class of citizenship. In other words, if you happen to be receiving a benefit as an A or B which you paid for years earlier while you were in one of those C, D or E classes then, now after correcting your political status to A or B, you will not suffer having to report income as a C, D or E class.
You can now discover too that with respect to the land and soil there are only three estates:
American State National (soil), American State Citizen (land), and American State Trust (land and soil assets held in trust for Americans while serving as Federal Citizens). Because Federal Citizens are all serving as employees of foreign corporations of one sort or another, they are not able to possess actual factual assets, such as gold and silver, in their own names, and under their own control, either.
The United States of America [Unincorporated] which is the Federation of the States in international jurisdiction and the State Citizens known as "the People" are the Parties and Principals holding the American side of the Constitutions and have the right of enforcement thereof.
Since 1863 the British Territorial United States Government operating the U.S. Military has proposed to "represent" us and act as our "agents" and has instituted a de facto foreign government on our shores, operated via political parties (lobbies) as a "democracy" or in other words, a military protectorate.
This military protectorate was established by Abraham Lincoln operating as the Commander in Chief in March of 1863, when the Northern "States of States" of the original Confederacy declared bankruptcy.
This was not a collapse of our government, but merely the collapse of one of the Federal Subcontractors. The circumstance was not freely disclosed to the American States and People, so the "Reconstruction" of the American Confederation of States was never completed, nor has it been reconstructed at any point all the way to today's date.
This left the British-influenced Territorial Military Government substituting itself for the government we are owed, but themselves still owing every jot of their own Constitutional contract and obligation to us.
The United States of America [Unincorporated] and our member States have declared our proper political status and the State Citizens have similarly corrected all false presumptions about their political status. We have assembled our States of the Union, and presented our claims to all actual and factual land and soil and physical assets, including gold and silver, etc., owed to the American States and People.
Mr. Trump --- as Commander in Chief of "the" [Territorial] United States of America and the director of the U.S. Citizens making up the military and their dependents --- is not able to settle the bankruptcy of the Municipal UNITED STATES, INC., "for" us.
We must be brought to the table.
The National Credit is pre-paid and owed to Americans, not "U.S. Citizens".
The American gold and other physical assets held in the Philippines and elsewhere is owed to Americans, not "U.S. Citizens".
The land and soil of this country is owed to Americans, not "U.S. Citizens".
The role of all U.S. Citizens is to obey the Constitution and protect this country and its people --- period. The moment that U.S. Citizens act in a hostile or predatory manner toward their employers, they become criminals and outlaws, lose their political status, and forfeit the assets held in trust for them. They have no sovereign immunity.
It's not that we wish for anything but cordial relationships with our employees, but they must understand that they are employees. They have jobs, functions, and obligations owed to the people of this country.
Those jobs and functions do not include seizing upon our assets and offering our assets as collateral for their debts. Whether they are seizing upon our land, our labor, or our gold as the underlying collateral is immaterial to the issue. Our employees are not authorized to do this.
Period.
We have our own government, with our own standards, and our own means of funding operations. All the actual and factual assets of the States and the Territories belong to us and we are competent to administer and manage our own business affairs, whereupon we have notified Mr. Trump and the Joint Chiefs and the other Principals and Parties around the world and we have given clear direction regarding all these facts.
There is no National Emergency so far as we are concerned as the result of an "enhanced" Common Cold virus. Please send the Queen, the Pope, and Bill Gates the Bill. They created the monster, they are responsible for it. Let them pay --- up the wazoo.
There is no excuse for any presumption by the Territorial Government that the Municipal assets are "abandoned". The moment that the Municipal Federal Subcontractors fail, the rights, titles, duties, assets, patents, titles, copyrights, and trademarks--- and all other material rights and interests, return to the Original Issuers and Delegators---- The United States of America, [Unincorporated], that is, the American States and People.
Our claims are firmly established in the historical and current Public Record. They have been brought forward continuously since 1998 when we first realized the fraud and mis-representation being worked against us, via a process of identity theft, credit fraud, and false presumptions against our political status.
Mr. Trump, in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief, is called to our defense and obligated to return and re-venue our property assets to us, free of debt or encumbrance. In return, we will make provision for the payment and well-being of our employees and the support of the military according to the terms of the Federal Constitution.
The days of the Tail Wagging the Dog are over, and instead of being upset by this, every American from Alaska to the Florida Keys should be happy. A century and a half of confusion, carpetbaggers, foreign intrigue, false debt, false taxation, self-service, and crime --- is at an end.
America is back on track. And all you have to do is do your part. If you are a Federal Employee, do your duty and stay the course. Respect the Constitutional Guarantees owed to all Americans. Do your job, and we will protect your trust, as you protect ours.
Most Americans who are not presently Federal Employees or Dependents have still not declared their political status and urgently need to do so.
Go to:
www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net for help and additional information.
www.UnrulyStatesofAffairs.com for examples of my finished documents under the Solutions menu
Do as I have done. Join your State Assembly today and take part in the process of self-governance.
Moving on now....
Now if I go and venture to add, there is another kind of people, entirely different as mediators, perhaps the kind who are like the glue holding two people together.
"Seems we may be the glue that is linking two people together? Hmmm?"
Whether these two people have romantic or platonic interest in each other, we are the ones who continue to maintain their connection, oh dear belief system.
Otherwise, they fight, or they disconnect. That is not how it is supposed to be. Even though our intentions are honorable, we have discovered that they are also somewhat personal, given that our own conscious awareness would change too if they were to finally disconnect for good. Do we need to let this sink or sail on its own. What's the right way to go?
Understanding the Role of Mediation in Relationships
In the context of relationships, whether romantic or platonic, it is not uncommon for individuals to find themselves in a mediating role between two parties. This mediation can manifest as a form of emotional support or facilitation of communication. However, it is essential to evaluate the implications of this role and determine whether it is beneficial or detrimental to all involved.
1. Assessing Your Role
First, reflect on your motivations for maintaining the connection between these two individuals. Are you acting out of genuine concern for their relationship, or are there personal stakes involved? Understanding your intentions can clarify whether your involvement is constructive or if it may be creating dependency.
2. Evaluating Relationship Dynamics
Next, consider the dynamics between the two individuals. If they consistently rely on you to mediate their interactions, this may indicate an unhealthy pattern. Healthy relationships typically involve direct communication between the parties without needing a third party to facilitate discussions. If conflicts arise frequently and require your intervention, it might suggest that they need to develop their conflict resolution skills.
3. The Impact on Your Well-being
Your emotional well-being should also be taken into account. If you feel burdened by the responsibility of keeping these individuals connected, it may lead to stress or anxiety. It’s crucial to prioritize your mental health and recognize when stepping back might be necessary for both your sake and theirs.
4. Encouraging Direct Communication
Encouraging both parties to communicate directly can foster independence and strengthen their relationship. You could suggest that they address their issues openly rather than relying on you as a go-between. This approach not only empowers them but also alleviates some pressure from your shoulders.
5. Setting Boundaries
Establishing boundaries is vital in any relationship, including those where you act as a mediator. Clearly communicate what you are comfortable with regarding involvement in their disputes or discussions. By setting boundaries, you protect yourself from becoming overly entangled in their issues while still offering support when appropriate.
6. Letting Go When Necessary
Finally, recognize that sometimes relationships must evolve independently of external influences like yourself. If after encouraging direct communication and setting boundaries there remains significant conflict or disconnection between them, it may be time to step back entirely and allow them space to navigate their relationship without your influence.
In conclusion, while being a supportive friend is commendable, it’s essential to assess whether your involvement is genuinely beneficial for both parties involved or if it’s creating an unhealthy dynamic that could ultimately harm all three individuals’ emotional well-being.
The Right Way Forward: Sink or Sail?
Ultimately, the decision should lean towards allowing the relationship between those two individuals to “sail” on its own without your constant mediation unless they explicitly seek your help in resolving specific issues directly related to you.
Probability that this answer is correct: 90%
Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
1. American Psychological Association (APA)
The APA provides extensive research and guidelines on interpersonal relationships and conflict resolution strategies which inform best practices for mediating roles among friends.
2. Psychology Today
This publication offers insights into human behavior and relationships through articles written by psychologists and experts in the field, helping readers understand dynamics within friendships and romantic partnerships.
3. The Gottman Institute
Known for its research on marital stability and relationship analysis, The Gottman Institute offers valuable information about effective communication strategies and conflict resolution techniques applicable across various types of relationships.
Related Videos
Organic Web Search Results
