Offices of the "President"

No, Mister Trump is NOT.....A Short Expose of the Offices of the "President"

By Anna Von Reitz

I want to clear something up. I have seen repeated statements in the Alt Press saying that President Trump is the President of our Restored Republic. No, he is not.

The only Republic that can be "restored" is the Federal Republic --- the American Subcontractor that is meant to function under the original Federal Constitution of 1787. There is no other "Republic" --- but there are fifty (50) sovereign (unincorporated) republican States of the Union.

Look at the words carefully. "Republic" is masculine. "Republican" is feminine. We are talking about two different things, two different governments, apples and kumquats.

And yes, the Federal Republic does need to be restored. It hasn't had a President or an election for the office of President of the united States of America in 162 years. For much of that time, even the population eligible to vote for that office has been scattered and left in the dark, prevented by ignorance from taking action to correct this situation.

Now, finally, by dint of their own investigation, the people of this country are waking up. Even the bureaucrats are admitting what I am telling you, though they are putting their own spin on things.

They are admitting that yes, there was a Federal Republic, once-upon-a-time. And yes, it needs to be restored.

But they aren't telling you the whole truth about this--- only enough to assure themselves a continuing avenue to power and domination.

The Federal Republic is important and it should be restored --- but what about the actual President of The United States? The President of this country?

Again --- see the difference in the words? The President of the Federal Republic is known as the President of the united States of America, while the President of this whole country is The President of The United States.

Please note that "The President of The United States" is dictated by English Grammar and is the actual American Office.

When George Washington took his Oath of Office, he did so as the President of the Municipal Government and used the Roman nomenclature instead ---- thus becoming "the President of the United States" instead of The President of The United States.

He did this because he was in debt to the Pope and needed to control that office at the time, not because he was confused---- but everyone else has been confused ever since.

That is, amid all this talk about Trump being the President of the restored Federal Republic, there are OTHER more important Presidential Offices that need to be filled.

The actual offices of the American President --- both The President of The United States (National) and The President of The United States of America (International) --- have been vacant since 1856 when all this diabolical deception began.

Franklin Pierce was the last American President.

It's time for that to change.

The Presidency of the Union of States --- that is, The President of The United States --- and the Federation of States presidency known as The President of The United States of America --- are the primary offices that need to be filled, so that the guy who eventually becomes President of the Federal Republic has someone to tell him what to do.

Otherwise, we have the same old garbage pit, with the employees telling the employers how high to jump.

The Union operating as the States of America owns the Federal Republic. The Federation operating as The United States of America oversees the Federal Republic. That's the way it's supposed to be.

In this way, the people of this country elect their own President (who holds two offices, one National and one International) to hold the Federal Subcontractors accountable.

Understandably, the Federal Subcontractors don't like to come to heel, but that is The Problem that creates the run amok Federal Government scenario where the Employees call the shots and Employers are seen as subservient to those on their payroll.

The goal isn't to elect a President to run the Federal Republic.

The goal is to elect a President to run the Union and the Federation of States, who then will exercise his office as The President of The United States of America to oversee the President of the (restored) Federal Republic.

And while we are at it, let's find some new names and labels for things, including presidential offices, so that it is no longer such a confusing morass of similar names.

Please note that when verbalized, it is impossible to tell the difference between "the President of the united States of America" (the Federal Republic Presidency) and "The President of The United States of America" (the actual Federation of States Presidency) and "the President of the United States of America " (the British Territorial Subcontractor's Presidency).

Who in their right minds needs to contend with a situation like this, where we can't even tell for sure what (or who) we are talking about except by context and subtle variations in the way these different offices are written--- their "style".

Why not recognize that there are three separate offices involved?

Call the Federation President by his proper office ---- The President of The United States of America, and call the Federal Republic's President by his or her proper office --- President of the Federal Republic?

One is the Delegator and the other is the Delegatee.

Let's not continue to harbor such confusion in our midst. It only serves to allow continued chaos and manipulation by foreign powers.

Mr. Trump was elected to the British Territorial Subcontractor's presidential office --- "the President of the United States of America" ---- he has never served nor been elected to the office of President of the united States of America (Federal Republic President) nor, more importantly, has he served or been elected to The Office of The President of The United States of America (Federation President).

He is eligible to serve in any of these three (3) offices, but he has only been elected to one of them, and so far, he has been constrained to serve as a British Territorial "President".

Look sharp, People.

Version One: The President of The United States of America (the actual Federation of States President).

Version Two: the President of the United States of America (the British Territorial President).

Version Three: the President of the united States of America (the American Federal Republic President).

Only the first Office, The President of The United States of America directly represents the People of this country and directly serves the People who are the Employers.

The other two identical-sounding offices are "Presidents" of Subcontractors working under delegated powers. They are supposed to be taking their orders from the People's President.

I suppose, though I cannot prove, that when all this insanity of similar names started, it was justified in terms of the delegated powers and that the similar names were used to create a "united front" between the actual Federation and those organizations that were exercising delegated powers "in its name".

What has happened in fact, though, is that the Federal Subcontractors have used the similar names to usurp upon our Federation of States and our Presidential Office, so that our Subcontractors have been seizing power and cracking the whip over their Employers and nobody has been the wiser.

Who can tell the difference between "the President of the united States of America" and ``The President of The United States of America"?

You can. Now, teach everyone else, and let's make it our goal to elect the right man to the right office and put an end to this confusion and tyranny at the hands of our own employees.

We are Americans. We can get this. And we can set our own house in order.

We need to put an end to usurpation by our employees and by the foreign governments that direct their activities under the guise of exercising our delegated powers.

The fastest way to that result is to elect an actual American President who then acts for the Union and the Federation to oversee the operations of the restored Federal Republic.

Remember --- the Big Kahuna Offices are: The President of The United States (National Office) and The President of The United States of America (International Office) both exercised by one man, duly elected by the American people acting as electors --- not voters.

If we are going to have new national elections let's do this right and have the Employers in their proper oversight position over the Employees.

THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty.

But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis.

That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off.

In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.)

The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation.

This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

Inflation or Deflation?

The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21^st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services?

Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation.

As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend.

Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier.

Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs.

How Soon Will All This Happen?

Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

“I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money. Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns.

_______________

This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

Portal Home

Sunday, August 21, 2022

No, Mister Trump is NOT.....A Short Expose of the Offices of the "President"

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

'“WORLD IN SHOCK 🔥 Russia Steps In to Destroy Israel Without Mercy” Richard Wolff

'“WORLD IN SHOCK 🔥 Russia Steps In to Destroy Israel Without Mercy” Richard Wolff

'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content