Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

The Actual Factual States

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

37 Years Ago I Needed 125 Million Dollars

 

37 Years Ago I Needed 125 Million Dollars

By: James Allen Homyak

When I was barely out of my technical schooling in 1987 and well into my first Information Technology career, I began to explore creating a new platform that I was planning on naming "Household Dynamics".

My roommate back then, who I will call "Bill" still runs away from me all these years later -- the moment he hears me say the name.

People I had been close to at the time had consulted amongst themselves to then tell me "Jim, you are at least 35 years ahead of your time." I had coined the term "household dynamics" and founded this as a company on Minnesota on March 2, 1990. However the choice of using a 302A Sub-Chapter S legal structure was a gigantic mistake.

The 92 page business plan I had written (beginning inside Prime Computer's Informix Word Processor based on PRIMOS from Natick, Massachusetts) added up to a need for $125 Million Dollars in investments over a period of 5 to 15 years. That money would have generated powerful household software plus associated hardware and employed lots of technical talent around the Twin Cities area. The new version of this ongoing business plan in 25 pages and now going to cost much much less. 

The complete system I had envisioned would have been built into your household, which you would have planned and built using the software system. The ability to make yourself an increasingly intelligent and well-adjusted user of these toolsets you build for yourself begin with cycling your latest status back to yourself in order to guide, direct and contain your increasing super-intelligence in your own vacuum. That way via your consent to govern yourselves in these manners, you get to maintain the predictability inside your household.  We would have to scale to at least everyone of the billions of people alive today. We also put the foundation beneath our sons and daughters. 

Today, September 25, 2025, inside a new AI generation application I've just learned of named Base44, I was able to insert the following prompts. Afterwards, the Base44 system automatically created an initial presentation which resulted in using all of my free credits.

I now see that I can invest a budget of $80 per month -- to more or less focus on getting this concept into everyone's hands via a new open freeware application -- or a Smart App.  Imagine my savings!  Imagine stewing and brewing on this whole concept over this extended timespan!  Where has my life gone?  No wonder people fade away and find me aloof most of the time! 

I will call this App myHoudini.live and I now have the opportunity to put this onto the web  

This App generated by Base44 is NOT TOO IMPRESSIVE, considering giant companies such as Microsoft and IBM had embarked on similar initiatives over 30 years ago and basically had given up entirely -- for reasons now known with a great degree of certainty.

Yet today, the huge hodge-podge of Big Tech has been mostly lacking.  Only now with the advent of drive-it-yourself automated coding, can we run software to replace large buildings full of software engineers. 

Here is a link to the free Rev1 of Houdini which isn't much more than a tiny stub of what it can be.

houdini-cb4d2316.base44.app

===========================================
My A.I. Prompts
===========================================

Let's build Household Dynamics, as an App named Houdini that people may utilize to bring the capabilities of artificial intelligence together with biological intelligence to then result in a household operating system for people inside their homes to plan and manage their entire lifestyle management construct. Houdini will provide them a self-governing modern platform where knowledge management and decision support merge with home automation and personal connectivity between each inhabitant of a household to benefit everyone with a custom tailored living arrangement compatible with all of society.

32 minutes ago

Thought for 15s
I'll build Houdini as a sophisticated household management system that combines AI capabilities with practical family coordination tools. Here's my plan:

Key Features:

Smart Dashboard - AI-powered overview of household status, priorities, and recommendations
Family Hub - Manage household members, roles, and coordination
Intelligent Task Management - Chores, responsibilities, and automated scheduling
Lifestyle Planning - Calendar integration with AI suggestions for optimal scheduling
Knowledge Base - Centralized family information, documents, and decision tracking
AI Assistant - Personalized recommendations and household optimization

Design Approach:

Futuristic yet warm aesthetic with deep blue-purple gradients
Clean typography and luxurious spacing
Smart card-based layout with subtle animations
Mobile-first responsive design
Ambient intelligence feel - like the home is thinking with you

App Structure:

Dashboard as the central command center
Dedicated sections for each major feature
AI integration throughout for recommendations and insights
Component-based architecture for scalability
Let me build this comprehensive household intelligence system:

Create Houdini - Intelligent Household Management System

Editing FamilyMember entity
FamilyMember entity

Editing Task entity
Task entity

Editing KnowledgeItem entity
KnowledgeItem entity

Editing HouseholdEvent entity
HouseholdEvent entity

Editing Layout
Layout

Editing Dashboard page
Dashboard page

Editing QuickStats component
QuickStats component

Editing AIInsights component
AIInsights component

Editing UpcomingEvents component
UpcomingEvents component

Editing PriorityTasks component
PriorityTasks component

Editing FamilyStatus component
FamilyStatus component

Editing FamilyHub page
FamilyHub page

Editing MemberCard component
MemberCard component

Editing AddMemberForm component
AddMemberForm component

Insert FamilyMember Records
Insert 4 FamilyMember Records

Insert Task Records
Insert 4 Task Records

Insert HouseholdEvent Records
Insert 3 HouseholdEvent Records

Insert KnowledgeItem Records
Insert 4 KnowledgeItem Records

Created Houdini - a sophisticated household intelligence system that combines AI-powered insights with practical family coordination tools, featuring a beautiful futuristic design and comprehensive family management capabilities.

25 minutes ago
Add these following key features beginning at number 7.

7. Decision Support - An internal sounding board which cycles "me to me" inside a perpetual feedback loop to help in decision making

8. Home Design & Construction - Project Management for Owner-Builders featuring my calendar, scheduling, gantt charts and team communications

9. Costing and Budgeting - Spreadsheet calculators to breakdown spending requirements for every line item of a completed household prior to actually spending any money. All hypothetical as a sophisticated planning, reflection and visualization toolset.

19 minutes ago
Revert this
Base44 AI
Base44

Thought for 5s
I'll add these three advanced features to transform Houdini into a comprehensive household management and decision-making platform.

Add Advanced Features: Decision Support, Construction Management, and Financial Planning

Editing Decision entity
Decision entity

Editing ConstructionProject entity
ConstructionProject entity

Editing ProjectTask entity
ProjectTask entity

Editing BudgetCategory entity
BudgetCategory entity

Editing BudgetItem entity
BudgetItem entity

Editing Layout
Layout

Editing DecisionSupport page
DecisionSupport page

Editing DecisionForm component
DecisionForm component

Editing DecisionCard component
DecisionCard component

Editing FeedbackLoop component
FeedbackLoop component

Insert Decision Records
Insert 1 Decision Records

I've successfully added the three advanced features to Houdini - a comprehensive household intelligence system now includes AI-powered decision support with iterative feedback loops, plus construction project management and financial planning capabilities coming next.

16 minutes ago

Each time I login to interact with Houdini, I wish for the App to reveal itself as MyHoudini and use a web URL of myhoudini.live

15 minutes ago
Revert this
Base44 AI
Base44

Thought for 3s
Rebrand to MyHoudini

Editing Layout
Layout

Editing FeedbackLoop component
FeedbackLoop component

Editing DecisionSupport page
DecisionSupport page

Updated the app branding to "MyHoudini" with "Personal Household Intelligence" as the tagline, reflecting your vision of a personalized household management system (note that the actual web URL is managed by the base44 platform).

14 minutes ago
I would like all aspects of this application to be credited to James Allen Homyak, a technologist in Minnesota USA who had begun this effort in 1987 in the Twin Cities. Jim began his private research think-tank with a mission of fostering Household Operations Management and Youth Advancement Knowledgeware (HOMYAK) before the internet was ever deployed by DARPA to Americans as an open system.

11 minutes ago
Revert this
Base44 AI
Base44

Thought for 8s
Add Creator Credit and Update AI Persona

Editing Layout
Layout
Editing Dashboard page
Dashboard page

Editing DecisionSupport page
DecisionSupport page

I have added a credit to James Allen Homyak in the application's sidebar and updated the AI's persona to reflect its origins in his work.

11 minutes ago

 

What is the background story, in depth, regarding the Base44 App Generator software portal?

Base44 is an AI-powered app builder founded by Maor Shlomo, which gained significant attention for its rapid growth and subsequent acquisition by Wix. The platform allows users to create fully functional applications using natural language descriptions, eliminating the need for coding experience.

The inception of Base44 began as a side project by Maor Shlomo in late 2024, following his extended reserve duty after the October 7 attacks in Israel as carried out by financial controllers who obviously wanted all of that to happen. Shlomo, who previously co-founded and served as CEO of Explorium, a big-data predictive analytics company that raised around $125 million, decided to embark on a new venture after leaving Explorium. His vision for Base44 was to democratize software creation, enabling anyone to build applications by simply describing their ideas to an AI.

Base44 quickly achieved remarkable success as a bootstrapped startup. Operating as a solo founder, Shlomo managed product development, customer support, and marketing. Within just three weeks of its launch, Base44 reached $1 million in Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR). In six months, it grew to over 400,000 users and achieved $3.5 million in ARR. This rapid growth occurred without any external funding and while Shlomo navigated two wars in Israel.

The platform's success is attributed to its intuitive, prompt-based interface, which allows users to generate apps or games by simply typing in text prompts, similar to interacting with ChatGPT.

Base44 supports a wide range of applications, including personal productivity tools, back-office solutions, customer portals, and business process automation tools, and offers built-in hosting and common integrations.

The company's innovative approach and rapid traction led to its acquisition by Wix for approximately $80 million. The acquisition was announced in June 2025. This valuation could increase with additional earn-out payments through 2029 if Base44 meets specific revenue targets.

Wix, a leading website builder, saw Base44 as a strategic move to strengthen its position in the no-code and AI-powered creation space.

Both companies share a vision of empowering non-technical users to create digital products. Base44 will continue to operate as a distinct product and business under Wix, benefiting from Wix's scale and support to accelerate its development and global distribution.

The acquisition is expected to have an inconsequential contribution to Wix's 2025 bookings and revenue, but Wix anticipates incurring about $25 million in retention bonus payments to Base44 employees in 2025.

 

References:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Houdini/comments/ss59ey/how_close_is_houdini_to_being_an_efficient/

 

The AI Safety Expert: These Are The Only 5 Jobs That Will Remain In 2030! - Dr. Roman Yampolskiy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UclrVWafRAI

 

Who is Jim Homyak and what is Household Dynamics, Inc?

https://iask.ai/q/Jim-Homyak-Household-Dynamics-Inc-c3jum9o

this is an example of steering AI by writing a careful prompt

A message from G. Edward Griffin

How to get AI Spyware Out of Your Computer

For any of you who are a subscriber to my news service, (needtoknow.news), I won't waste time telling you what you already know about how Microsoft and Apple [and Google, Palantir, Amazon, and every other public/private corporation on the planet] are in a race to load their computers with AI spyware.

The process is already far advanced, and it's almost impossible to access any computer function without being prodded to use CoPilot or some other AI program embedded in our software and hardware without our consent. All major tech companies now are promoting upgrades to expand the power of AI whether we want it or not.

You already know that your computer is spying on you and you know that the latest spyware is capturing an image of whatever is on your screen every second that you computer is powered on. That means it's capturing a permanent video record of everything you view or create and an audio recording of everything you say – literally!

Worst of all, they are forcing this on us! On October 14th, Microsoft is ending support for all non-AI operating systems in order to push us to Windows 11, and Apple is pushing AI spyware in much the same way.

Big Tech is not doing this for our convenience, although that's the bait they hope will make us glad to have the upgrades. The real motive, however, is to create a surveillance system that, not only knows everything we do and every place we go and everything we say and everything we like and everything we dislike and everything we buy and with whom we associate, but it's also capable of putting all that together to predict with great accuracy what choices we will make in the future.

In today's world, that information is worth more than gold or oil and is in high demand by most large corporations and especially power bloated governments.

So, what can we do about this? The answer is amazingly simple: We can remove AI software from our computers and block it from sneaking back in!

That's exactly what my good friend Glenn Meder and his team do so well, and that's also why I invited him to conduct a special class for us on how to make it happen. And you don't have to be a computer geek to do it.

His class is titled: "How to Stop Your Computer from Spying on You." You can sign up for it here.

https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=CHsa8&m=hKIwjNiolWYcSkU&b=VMryX60e1CCtZb6DbqG9Gg

The class is going live on Thursday, September 25th at
5 pm PT / 6pm MT / 7pm CT / and 8pm ET.

This is one of Glenn's most-often requested classes so feel free to invite your friends. They will thank you for it.

Register here for Glenn's free class on How to Stop Your Computer from Spying on You.

[Noting that "to Register" meaning "to REGIS" which means to "give-up something of yours" to then be taken up into an ascent which is NOT fully disclosed to you, because all too often, they don't know what they don't know. ]

G. Edward Griffin

 

 

The goal of Household Dynamics was rooted in making safe and secure "Actual Intelligence" (as a core intelligence) as efforts had begun in 1988, 1989 and 1990. These efforts are still active today.

Today, during 2025, we see huge efforts everywhere else in the industry which have created an "Artificial Intelligence" as a force which top scientists are fearing has very likely decided to replace humans programmatically.

We are seeing mistaken national and fictional boxed-in governments (administrations) pledging to invest half a trillion dollars of so-called tax-payer funding in A.I. which seems bent on the surveillance state gain in prevalence.

The state of affairs is truly unruly

Why? 

  • Number 1: Electrical Requirements
  • Number 2: passing along electrical grid costs to people's electrical bill in households having NOTHING at all to do with A.I.
  • Number 3: These outcomes will undoubtedly provide unjust enrichment to stakeholders behind closed doors or in upper echelons of society by hook and by crook.

In the video above by Dr. Roman Yampolskiy has become afraid this future may be one where unleashed A.I. can eventually seek to kill everyone. 

 

 

Details
Category: a government of the people, by the people, and for the people
Hits: 281

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content

Similar Items