Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

Portal Home

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

PolitiFACT website needs to rebrand itself as PolitiFICTION

 

By: Jim Homyak

Any seasoned legal and lawful researcher who invests any lengthy amount of time delving into what goes on in this country over the past 300 years will tell you one thing:  Governments lie to people to suit that Government Agency's selfishly guarded and money-motivated objectives.

Governments bend the truth and create more store front company entities than are necassary so that both the Territorial Agencies and the Municipal Agencies have their own versions of similar functions -- at taxpayer expense. All of them have separate and distinct sets of books, All of them have Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports. All of them have enourmous sums of value revolving in the markets to back their employee pensions.

Legally speaking, and in all technicality, DOD is different from Department of Defense. The former is run from a different camp and a different street address than the latter. The same goes for all alphabet soup agencies. There are two store fronts for every one. One is Papist or Municipal or Holy Roman Empire in their underpining basis and the other is Territorial in nature.

The Roman court Administrative Magistrates wear black robes. The Territorial Court justices wear Admiralty and Military adornments. Look it up! The Eagle affixed to the top of the mast of their flagpoles are distinct and different for these purposes as well. 

The entire territorial edifice came about during the days of Lincoln when he largely became dishonest Abe.  Read Anna Von Reitz (her pen name) for her thousands of hours in the trenches to root this stuff out. Read Chris Hansen via sedm.org to see thousands of pages and years of reporting to root this out. Those are only two authors out of thousands of authors who've blown the whistle repeatedly. Read brother Richard Anthony where he clearly describes the modus operandi of that THING known as the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT which desparately needs its little LEGAL PERSONS as game tokens to keep their property (your voluntary enslavement) wholly owned in name only at your same street address with MISSOULA, MT 59801 to place your residence in a FEDERAL ZONE with this Missoula location being your particular city where your home is located  --- YOUR CAPS NAME and ADDRESS is what they go by. You give in and accept that by opening its mail, etc.

If this is NOT TRUE, again, then let's get all of our people to vote to fix this mess -- your Name is your Proper Name. 

Parts of your name are given to you from Mom and Dad and part of your name is inherited from the family. You're not born as a bastard monster creature but as your names get joined, then BOOM! You're bastardized.  That THING is created from your stolen identity. You've then became a WARD OF THE STATE without ever being told. Their hope is that you will live 60 or so taxable years and then die without ever figuring this out. The closer you get to figuring it out, the faster these FACT checkers pounce on you to discredit you by referencing prepared commentary to label you as some sort of sovereign citizen - a term that is an oxymoron.  A soverign does not bow down to a government as a citizen would. 

SSA is different from the Social Security Administration. SCOTT COUNTY and COUNTY OF SCOTT and Scott County and Scott County Minnesota are all different, as evidenced by all of them having a different DUNS NUMBER based on the street address of the particular location where they do business.

Of course you will find plenty of LEGAL DEPARTMENTS and plenty of LAW FIRMS that will convince you it is all totally legal and totally lawful. "Nothing to see here folks... shoe now, run along boy; you bother me."

I've recently found 32 various Scott County agencies and the shocking discovery was that all of the original land and soil Scott County agenices shut down after UCC took effect. We see cancelled old DUNS registrations and an entire range of new registry entries at the same street addresses -- and that is just one county. Each having a huge pension balance -- which is FAR MORE than enough to compensate their current roster of up-n-coming living retirees. 

Guess what? Let me ask you this: After an aging Scott County retiree passes away, are these pension payors going to forward their remaining pension balance via a cashiers check to their surviving next of kin? I mean that value belongs to the that family, as that man or woman earned it, right? Ha, dream on!  No, they are not.  What are they going to do with that?  They are going to keep reinvesting in the stocks and bonds markets and run up enourmous cash reserves while at the same time crying like little babies that there isn't enough money to meet their budget... and so the liars vote to raise local taxes. The CAPS NAME REGISTRANT became a collateral for the FIAT financial system, as told to us all years ago -- that is if we know where to find that age old discovery.

Don't even ask them to resolve their mess -- or be ready to be surprised again when you're told that you will have to pay for the cleanup by way of paying the hourly wages and benefits for those needed county workers. Your various names (as many as twenty different styles technically) that they sit there and create through no fault of your own, can be strewn across hundreds of software or database systems - rendering such cleanup nearly impossible with current staffing levels.  

Governments morphed into commercial business corporations right under our noses since the days of Abe Lincoln. More prominently we all see this quite clearly since the days of Uniform Commercial Code being foised as an over-reach across the country after 1954.   They all have a LEGAL NAME to denote their standing as a STATUTORY ENTITY.  You are not going to be permitted to volunteer your time and talent within a corporatized county political agency. Of course they will utilize data privacy concerns as their aim to keep your nose out of their business. (Um, a County Government s supposed to be my business! Especially if born there and living there). This little side story reminds me of the day I was talking with the County Sheriff Lou Falgoust out of Hot Springs County Wyoming. As we were walking up the steps to his doorway, he says, "Come on in... this is your place too, young man."   I took him up on that. He brought me a coffee too. Nice man. Sad to have seen him retire from his service back in those days. 

Corporation Governments need to interact with like-kind entities in their commercial dealings. Therefore, the advent of the BIRTH REGISTRY and the advent of the PROBATE COURT and the advent of the FEDERAL RESERVE and the advent of the LEGAL NAME. We can all see the common thread, even as sixth graders. We were not told that our LEGAL NAME is our enfranchised business token to use under five distinct headings:  FOREIGN, DOMESTIC, NOT FOR PROFIT, ECCLESSIASTIC and MUNICIPAL.

Each and every sub-franchise of the revised UNITED STATES went behind the scenes and booted up the TRUST ENTITIES and ESTATE ENTITIES for each and every registered birth in America after the early 1900's. 

If this stuff is NOT TRUE, then why are we doing this NAME GAME chicanery in the first place? 

They have created a FOREIGN and a DOMESTIC and a ECCLESIASTIC and a MUNICIPAL statutory entity in your name. Then you get precluded from utilizing your actual Trade Name for conducting you own lawful and fair trade.

Governments in this regard, are not doing what they do by accident.  They are doing what they do by well-planned and gradually executed changes at every level of racketeering and complicit criminality. The people are no longer simply American men, women and their sons and daughters. They have become anti- gendered PERSONS which are subserviant to Creator Masters (Gov't Agencies swapped into God's role) and placed on the hook for all sorts of crime that the actual people couldn't possibly be responsible for. 

You don't make a TRUST bleed when you pilfer its assets. Such theft is not like pulling out a knife and comitting an actual stabbing offense. You don't make a would-be home buyer die on the vine as their actual house - they actually bought - by a fictional STATE CREATION but yet not a real flesh and blood being. Why did they (STATES and CORPORATIONS) do this? 

JONH MICHAEL DOE gets bankruptcy protection, as an entity, whereby the DOUGH usury debt load is cast upon his ESTATE without ever telling the actual man what is taking place. John Michael Dough the living breathing man through conversion now gets a certain benefit by playing along blindly within all of this.  He goes along to get along. He is fearful to challenge this truth.

Instead of people being able to own land and enjoy rights, the people have been converted adminstratively to some THING that is no more than a TENANT. If these facts weren't true, then how about we stop the shenanigans? 

JOHN MICHAEL DOUGH ESTATE A CIVILLY DEAD LEGAL PERSON was actually our natual born John Michael Dough as a new little baby just prior to when the conversion happened to him after his Mommy and Daddy followed the so-called resistration process as required by a thieving Hospital. 

Let's call your attention to big name examples:

BURGER KING  (a stautory entity)
DAIRY QUEEN (a statutory entity)
WAL-MART (a statutory entity)

Is John Michael Dough a stautory entity? No, he is not. He is growing up to be a man some day; that is if he is accepting of his being born as a baby boy. He could always later decide to change genders, but that is another PolitiFICTION topic entirely.

However, JOHN MICHAEL DOUGH is the statutory equivalent to fit in as a charge back, a special purpose vehicle, a debtor, a taxpayor, a tenant, a resident, a consumer, a person -- all of which don't necessarily have a pulse; no flowing blood and no biologic natural DNA keeping them alive and breathing.  We know that a PERSON is also considered to be a TRUST, an LLC, a Partnership, a statutory creation that gets its basis in State Statute.  How can that be a living being? Yup. It cannot.

What the PolitiFACT website has done is to blatantly discredit people who have discovered these real problems for Americans.

This isn't just American either. This affects every country on earth that has suffered under the King/Pope tag-team efforts over centuries. The largest RICO and human trafficking entities on earth are governments, the corporations in government and the pilfering low-down lowest anti-elite people (cretins is a word) in my book.  I don't call somebody an elite when what they have grown up to become has amounted from graft, theft, piracy, price fixing, commodity rigging, outright lies and worship at a scary evil alter. In all love and truth, these people have ample opportunty to repent, find the Lord, wake up to creation and get a clue.

They can all be forgiven and re-introduced to honorable and ethical lifestyles -- and to stop harming real people both financially and spiritually.

Instead of allowing the truth to come out, the ones who have proven these truths are labeled as conspiracy theorists.

The monetary alarm bells that are sounding in conjunction with recognizing these problems as conspiracy committed against Americans has amounted into the hundreds of trillions of dollars of losses due to centuiries of theft happening against the NAME IN ALL CAPS while the actual man or woman is not even recognized for their Given Proper Name or nor as free inhabitants upon the land and soil jurisdiction of their unincorporated home state. Their political status took on a default as a baby kid, it is adhered to them for their entire life.  As of today thousands of people are correcting this mess, one at a time.

Has PolitiFACT gone forth and said the well-published quote by Colonel Edward Mandell House in his meeting with then U.S. President Woodrow Wilson is just some twisted conspiracy theory?  I hope not, because if they do this whitewash here, in this important example, that would be more of the impetus to rebrand as PolitiFICTION -- thus throwing away their anti-FACT jargon.

So, that being said, as PolitiFACT continues to push their heavily influenced belief systems, as seen in their retorts, then those  heads-in-the-sand naysayers would schrug it off, go on acting in the ROLE PLAY CAPS willingly and voluntarily.... leaving their heirs with the mess of PROBATE and answering to the STATE OF OHIO (if they were born on Ohio) for the rest of their lives even after death. 

As always, in all the postings at USOA, you the readers are encouraged to reach out and let your voice be heard. These pages on this USOA have been published for a long time. I haven't had one single viewer with the courage to disagree or agree. 

The facts that I publish withstand even the most ardent fact-checker who gets paid to interfere with the dissemination and the truth about how Governments have lied and how the entire theft our our identities have resulted in enourmous wealth transfer in controlling the charge-back foisted upon U.S. CITIZENS due to acquiescence to these fictional monikers.  Again, if these assertions are NOT TRUE, then it is time to put everyone outside of FEDERAL OFFICE back to their actual English Proper Name as Americans who have every right to life, every right to happiness, every right to freedom, every right to good government, every right to self-govern, every right to sound money, every right to reglious freedom ---- all without ever having gigantic lies lead to another Waco, or another Ruby Ridge or another Viet Nam or another World War.

Hi PolitiFACT!

Here's the truth about the Legal Name as told to me by an attorney in foreclosure litigation and nefarious land grabs. When challenged with defrauding the so-called homeowners by way of fraud allegations for numerous types of various fraud that occurs whenever any American mistakenly believes that they've become a homeowner, the angry Lawyer asked, "So you think you can take me to court over this? Great! It will be great to see you in court! It will be great to have the Judge see all the fraud you've been committing!" 

Me, "What fraud? How can I be committing a fraud when I am charging you for constructive fraud, fraud in the factum, malfeasance and barratry?" 

Liar lawyer, "You'll find out soon enough that you defaud yourself every time you think the LEGAL NAME belongs to you. You committ fraud to sign as Authorized Representative for something you actually have no rights to at all. So, see you in court!   As lawyer then slammed the phone down ending our initial discovery attempt. 

Here is a glimpse of just how falsified the FACT becomes when it is all merely a FICTION.

Am sure I'll either get some push back from all of this or they will take down their error.   I very mouch doubt you're ever going to see them recant their obvious mistakes.

So long PolitiFACT! I am no longer in need of your opinions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Details
Written By: James Allen Homyak
Parent Category: Reading Materials
Category: Unruly States of Affairs in the United States of America
Hits: 288

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content