Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

Portal Home

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

The BlackRock Situation Just Got Worse

 

 

The BlackRock Situation Just Got Worse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwTxjZK17bs

Adapted By: Jim Homyak

 

Minnesotans have faced a vast dilemma ever since 1858 when the 1857 free Minnesotans voted to establish Minnesota state as a member of the union of States according the Organic Laws for the united States of America, (small u) which at the time included The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation and The North West Ordinance.  (all sited here)

Ever since then, WHAMMO! 

  • Identify Theft! - by government contractors
  • Property Theft! - by government contractors
  • Resource Theft! - by government contractors 

The only ones who can actually own soil and have jurisdiction over it are living men and women. Not corporations.

The only ones who can own land and have jurisdiction over it are Lawful Persons, owned and controlled by the living people. Not Corporations.

Some persons and institutions have forgotten these facts of Law and need to be reminded— by the forces of accountability.

Various corporations have stepped forward with criminal fraud schemes that have allowed them to claim that they "represent" us and that via purported claims of foreign citizenship on our parts, our land and soil assets are under their care— all without the nicety of telling us and without proving that we accepted any such citizenship obligations knowingly and voluntarily.

The Local Utility Corporations that act in Gross Breach of Trust and illegally latched upon our land and soil assets still don't have standing to actually own any land or soil in this country nor in this state. 

Those of us, over 35,000 American State Nationals and over 2,000 State Citizens, have formally in writing asserted our natural born political status and expatriated from any presumed foreign citizenships. We've been asserting ourselves quite often to all so-called elected officials for a very long time, We're repeated ourselves publicly and internationally to boot.

Some people, inured to the foreign concept of the British Territorial "democracy" think that this small number of people reclaiming this favored status is not important for lack of numbers— but this is not a matter dependent on numbers. People keep using that word DEMOCRACY without realizing the only place such a thing can exist by definition is inside THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

This is a matter of inheritance

And whether there are two heirs or a hundred million is immaterial. We Minnesotans are still the heirs, still populating our counties and our State, still owed back our public and private assets without exception. But yet as contrived by way of a BIRTH REGISTRATION and that devastating LEGAL STANDING our names each became fictional U.S. CITIZENS and with such a "game token" as this is, we're presumed dead commercial entities without a voice anymore. The "system" thinks we're all happy as a pig in the mud -- owning nothing and being happy.  

Other native nations that also live here deserve recognition of their soil claims, too, and that's just fine with us.

We are all living men and women. We We Are Not Corporations. Not Franchises. Not "Citizens" belonging to any commercial or municipal corporation - as doing so means the harm against us goes on with impunity and without accountability.

My good name, in their several administrative styles, has been formally expatriated from all forms of Federal Dual citizenship for over a decade, established on the public records of many States and institutions.

The Expatriation Act of 1868 guarantees my powers to enforce my right to put an end to all presumptions of foreign citizenship and to retain my character as an American State National, which I have done. I have also accepted all gifts with no strings attached and waived all benefits of foreign citizenship. I do continue to receive what is owed back to me, while its coming back at far too slow of a pace.

These "entities" known as STATE OF MINNESOTA, and BLACKROCK and MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION need to get back inside their box -- namely back inside THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA where their 1950's through 1960's reorganizations happened, and get off the backs of the Minnesotan people. THEY/They/they can return back to Minnesotans what belongs to all of us.  What is found on Minnesota belongs to Minnesotans. It has always been this way lawfully.  See all the above CAPITAL LETTERS NAMES for what a LEGAL ENTITY gets to do via racketeering as propped up by devastating infiltration of the court system, and BAR ASSOCIATIONS.

America is comprised of our fifty States of the union - prior to being sent through the Hall of Mirrors

The living people of this country populate the physical Counties that make up the fifty union States and their Lawful Persons populate the States of the Union.   Having nothing to do with the Administrative Enclaves foisted off onto our backs under Uniform Commercial Codes. 

The International Court of Justice and the Principals responsible have been notified of these facts

Pretending that we are not here or that they can't hear us because we function under Natural Law and don't submit to their jurisdiction in no way changes our right to repudiate the whole public trust interest scam that they have used to misrepresent us and everyone else. The chink in their armor is at the first step of the fraud against humanity— the creation of the purportedly "waived" American Infant Decedent Estate Trust and the simultaneous creation of a British Territorial Person operating under our Given Name.

We have already examined the deceitful and undisclosed and ultimately unconscionable nature of this purported U.S. Citizenship contract being foisted off onto American babies.

So where did all the rest of the bunk come from? What makes the above listed entities continue to run roughshod over the people's rights? Where did the British Territorial "Person" come from?

In 1863 Abraham Lincoln begins the unconstitutional practice of issuing "Executive Orders" and claiming "Emergency Powers" that don't exist.

He issued "General Order 100" and the next day he bankrupted the British Territorial Corporation doing business as the United States of America (Incorporated). That's what Lincoln was actually "President" of. Not this country. A bankrupt British Territorial Corporation.

The foreign bankruptcy court and trustees move in.... Five years later, in 1868. a Scottish Commercial Corporation calling itself "The United States of America— (Incorporated)" is formed, going on to publish what is known as the Corporate Constitution the same year— a different KIND of "Constitution" that allows their Territorial Congress to "amend" this Constitution at will without any ratification by the States.

This is all foisted off with no explanation or full disclosure to the American people.

Then they "legalized" something that is grossly unlawful

They claimed that all United States Citizens and Americans in general were British Territorial United States and/or U.S. Citizens.

They did this to make us responsible to pay off their debts in bankruptcy and they "legalized" this gross fraud by passing the Expatriation Act of 1868 one day prior to the final discharge of the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc. that was started by Lincoln in 1863.

So this is where the False Legal Presumption that we all adopted British Territorial Citizenship comes from. It's a gross and self-interested lie and Bad Faith and Breach of Trust — but they got away with it by keeping all this secret and not breathing a word to the American Public.

If anyone woke up enough to ask questions, they pointed at the Expatriation Act of 1868 and shrugged and said— there's your remedy!

You can expatriate back to your original status if you want. You can expatriate from their presumption of British Territorial Citizenship — you can, if you know that this lie has been told about you and that this foreign citizenship obligation has been conferred on you, but this repudiation of such foreign citizenship has to be in writing.

Of course, all this was hush-hush and arbitrary. BAR ASSOCIATION PUPPETS WILL LIE TO YOUR FACES EVERY CHANCE THEY GET!

The American people were never told. The Brits found various scams to force us to pay for their bankruptcy and so far encouraged because they got away with it in 1868, they decided to do it again in 1907 when they bankrupted the Scottish Corporation doing business as "The United State of America —— Incorporated".

Public Utility Commissions have carried out their dishonesty repeatedly. They don't know what they don't know. They have done this repeatedly.

Get after them enough with the force of law, and they will cowardly chase off into bankruptcy. Every time they go bankrupt they find some new citizenship or "status" to foist off on us and whatever it is, they "legalize" it by establishing remedy for it. They boot up another sham/scam/flim-flam using sematic deceit and similar names bunko under color of law.  They will gladly deprive you of your rights under color of law. They will gladly send their armed state police to use bully tactics. Again, not knowing what they don't know.

Example: SCOTT COUNTY,  SCOTT COUNTY MINNESOTA,  COUNTY OF SCOTT,  Scott County, etc. etc., on and on, all 87 counties doing this...  each with its own DUNS numbers. 

So here is a break in their presumed Chain of Title— some Americans did wake up, and they have expatriated from all presumptions of foreign citizenship, personhood, or voluntary foreign government service.

The people on Minnesota need to continue to expatriate under the Expatriation Act of 1868. When doing so the whole basis for the fraud against Americans collapses and so do all the derivative False Claims of Municipal "citizen of the United States" status and public trust interests related to it.

Breaking the False Claim of British Territorial Citizenship means there is no presumed to exist British Territorial Person for the Municipal Government to claim is "missing, lost at sea" and use to create all the "derivative" Municipal CORPS such as STATE OF MINNESOTA or COUNTY OF CROW WING. The list of municipal look-alike and sound-alike puppeteers is over 185,000 all around America.

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals and Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Every expatriated American is owed the immediate dissolution of all Presumptions of foreign citizenship obligations and release of all foreign public trusts named after them.

As a funny aside, some people in this country actually DO want to claim that they don't have "hands and feet" and want to give up their land and consign their bodies and money and everything else for their King.

But THEY/They/they can be found making False Claims to the effect that some "sovereign citizen movement" in its flawed beliefs must have "trafficked" them out of their chosen jurisdiction on the sea— in other words, the Perps are accusing status-corrected Minnesotan of doing to them what they already did to me and all the other Americans when they secretly and unlawfully converted us and claimed we were adopting British Territorial Citizenship.

But they have no cause to complain — the same remedy applies to them

They can expatriate from any foreign political status. Just remember — if you do that and give up the status of a living being and Lawful American Person and Heir that others before me saved for you, you lose control of your own body and fate and your land and your gold and your silver and every other physical asset that is otherwise owed to you. So you can be a living sacrifice for your King or your Pope or you can rise up and reclaim your non-citizen political status as a free man born within the borders of one of the States.

Go and read the more recent posts from Author/Researcher and Publisher Anna Von Reitz. Scroll to the bottom of her content page and read backwards from there to see how she has exposed similar shenanigans on Alaska. 

The authors of this video "The Blackrock Situation Just Got Worse" need a new study lesson it what has gone wrong on Minnesota and been swept under the proverbial rug in American for generations upon generations. 

Again, Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals and Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Details
Written By: James Allen Homyak
Parent Category: Reading Materials
Category: Unruly States of Affairs in the United States of America
Hits: 222

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content

Similar Items