Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

for JAMES ALLEN HOMYAK ESTATE 

by: James Allen Homyak

 

During 2019 a middle-aged Montanan man, (one who had deregistered his acting capacity as U.S. Citizen per se over a decade ago) born at Minnesota in the mid 60's to North Dakotan newlywed mother and father, had developed renal failure while visiting friends and vacationing at Wyoming near Yellowstone Park through the summer of 2019. He had suspected food poisoning and poor diet choices.

He traveled to Minnesota for the 2019's December/January holidays to visit and stay with family and friends. He subsequently became terribly ill and had to be taken to the E.R. He then progressed to having his heart stop completely on three different occasions while at three different hospitals. He had to be "life-flighted" to a larger more equipped hospital where care teams were successfully able to stabilize him. He now is living a more productive life once again aside from 15 hours of dialysis every 7 days.

However and nearly too late, these "life and death close calls" of his have prompted him to delve into lifestyle administrative affairs which he hasn't been taking care of as yet.  One of those topics is Estate Planning and his quest for answers.

During the early part of 2023, after working very diligently to achieve his best health possible considering he is in complete renal failure and a forever dialysis recipient, he decided to look for a local law firm to take up the task of Estate Planning. 

One such firm sent him "Information Collection Forms" to supply the names, etc. for various people who need to be brought in to participate in an Estate Plan that will need to take place as soon as possible.

While reading the forms, and reviewing the details spelled out, it became increasingly frustrating to see all sorts of terminology that should be comprehended before committing any other people into the process by naming them in such matters.  

Another large part of this man's life has been spent researching topics related to Citizenship, Commerce, the Legal System, social and civic affairs, Government establishments, American History and United States History.  He has as large a personal e-library as anyone I've ever known. He has studied so much, that it seems he's even forgotten more than he actually knows in his top-of-mind categories.

This essay is going to ask you a whole bunch of his same questions.

In addressing matters of Estate and Probate it seems we are taken into a foray of "civilly dead legal person" language, so much so that I have to agree -- we need a Glossary of Terms. We also need training and education of the motives behind our American "System" that forms the basis for finance, legalism, property and family planning matters in order for We The People to navigate the edifice and their choices set before us. Imagine how expensive this would be if you were billed your standard Attorney rates to teach you. Most people trust what they're told and they take all the default positions. 

Glossary of Terms

Note: Which version of which Legal Dictionary should be referenced to be current and valid? How far back into the past history of Legal Dictionary Revisions can the version you use be enforced in present day matters? Do I have to base my affairs on a particular version?

This next list of 34 items are transcribed from the Attorney supplied "Information Collection Forms" but because none of the terms are defined, we can conclude that LEGAL DETERMINATIONS must be made prior to just assuming what or who is being defined. Remember:  Who? What? Why? Where? When? How?  In order to protect yourself, you must know, define and apply your definition whenever you are intending "to be clear" in your documents.  Note that so many terms are supplied as both normal nouns as well as CAPITALIZED nouns. We think the capitalization is used to denote PERSON / TRUST / ENTITY of some sort, albeit not natural people.

  1. Estate / ESTATE
  2. ESTATE PLANNING FIDUCIARY CHOICES
  3. Fiduciary / FIDUCIARY
  4. Legal Name / LEGAL NAME / FULL LEGAL NAME
  5. Middle Initials / M.I. / MIDDLE INITIAL
  6. Successor / SUCCESSOR
  7. Successor Trustee / SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE
  8. Trust / TRUST
  9. Living Trust / LIVING TRUST
  10. Revocable Living Trust
  11. Address / ADDRESS
  12. Client / CLIENT
    1. PRIMARY CLIENT
    2. SECONDARY CLIENT

Note: Do these mean would-be clients of the attorney where the Estate Plan becomes an Attorney/Client legal matter?

  1. Person / PERSON
    1. Natural or Artificial?
    2. PERSON/Person/person can also mean "a Corporation" or "a Trust" or "a Partnership" or an "Individual Entity" which are not natural people, but are fictional constructs in law.
  2. Probate / PROBATE (Have to ask: Why? How? When? Where? )
  3. Representative / PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
  4. Attorney / ATTORNEY
  5. Attorney-in-Fact / ATTORNEY IN FACT
  6. Power of Attorney
  7. Authority

Note: Regarding myself rising up to the level of Author -- not turning to nor relying upon the governance of external entities and not being an "internal" to some entity bearing a LEGAL NAME

  1. Incapacitated
    Note: Pending a Medical Power Of Attorney held by his private family members
  2. Health Care Agent / HEALTH CARE AGENT
  3. Choices / CHOICES
  4. ADVISOR
  5. ACCOUNTANT
  6. INDIVIDUAL
  7. INVESTMENT
  8. INSURANCE
  9. LIFE INSURANCE AGENT
  10. You / YOU
    Note: The word "you" can easily be construed as a plural, and in that sense what is the plurality consisting of? Me and my persons and/or my team?
  11. GUARDIAN FOR MINOR CHILDREN
  12. BIRTHDATE / BIRTHDAY

Note: Birthday vs. Born on date - there is a difference

  1. U.S. CITIZEN / U.S. Citizen
    Note: It would be interesting to determine which kind of "citizen" your Estate Planning Attorney claims to be, and proves to be.
  2. HOME ADDRESS / Home Address

Note: What is the difference between ALL CAPS addresses and Proper Name addresses?

Example 1 (this is a CORPORATE ENTITY IN ALL CAPS, as addressed by The US POSTAL SERVICE to be treated as though it is inside of Commerce):

JARED P KUSHNER
1234 ANY ROAD, UNIT 5
SOMETOWN, ST 45678

Example 2 (this is how the man would write it himself, had he been aware of who he is outside of Commerce)

Jared Paul Kushner
1234 Any Road, Apartment 5
Sometown, State 
Postal Code 45678

 

  1. Post Marital Agreement?

Note: Be sure to have everything in writing.

This man, who inspired me to write today, is not easily confused... however he is also not one to just "willy-nilly" accept "colorable words" at face value -- as these above listed "words of art" get twisted and fashioned into shape for various matters at various times, as if these words are moving goal posts, etc. meant to confuse and intimidate.  Rather than writing LEGAL or Common English Definitions into this Essay, I will leave it up to my readers to do their own due diligence.

With an active imagination, he also has so many other thoughts racing through his mind and even going so far as to ask: What really happened the day he was born? He knows that his Dad was not able to be at the location where he was born. So he does not know for sure what process his Mom had taken to authenticate and validate her new baby boy, nor what she may have done to claim her baby. From his recollection, his mother never actually had taken herself and baby down to any official people to claim that she is taking baby home to her American location to raise her child. Did she leave afterbirth and/or biologic matter in the hands of others? Did the people helping her have her baby do anything with the biologic material aside from disposing it properly? Was there an undisclosed abandonment claim made regarding such biologic property? Why even ask?  Who established Probate? An Estate? Why? For what purpose? Does someone win or does someone lose? What is to gain? What is really going on?  This whole thing reeks of having a proverbial monkey on his back. He calls it a racket.

This whole topic of Estate Planning should be something each of us get in control of regarding State Influence. Additional questions include:

  1. After-Birth - what happens to this biologic matter once a child is born?
  2. LEGAL vs. LAWFUL?
  3. Minnesotan vs. American vs. U.S. CITIZEN?
  4. CERTIFIED COPY OF BIRTH RECORD
  5. BIRTH CERTIFICATE
  6. STATE OF MINNESOTA PROBATE COURT
  7. JOHN MICHAEL DOE  (some thing's FULL legal name) (A LEGAL U.S. RESIDENT)

Note: Is that a full LEGAL NAME or is it the name of some THING IDENTIFIED?

  1. Who / What / Why / Where / When / How is it that a middle initial became forced upon everyone in America? It never used to be that way.
  2. BAR - is that an acronym? What is the definition?  (Some researchers and writers stress that it means British Accreditation Registry.)
  3. How does a man protect his private property which includes everything he owns plus his two private automobiles from "State Claims" or impoundment actions?

When speaking of ESTATE are we talking about natural and physical things one man or woman can own or are we talking about Artificial Constructs which exist only in mind or on paper?

Are we to invoke Common Law, Public Law, Legislative Fiat or a combination of these?

Will you (or I or He) be forced into standing as "a Statutory Person" or "a Statutory Citizen" in order to achieve an actionable and enforceable Estate Plan?  Why not just call it what it is? The Lawful Directives Regarding Your Belongings and Obligations Upon Your Death

 

Why not JUST TELL YOU that some entity wants to claim itself as beneficiary to everything you've got if you happen to forget to make your Probate Avoidance Plan go into effect for yourself before you die?

Ask yourself:  Why and How and When and for whose benefit am I to make a WILL for myself and to do it properly so that my belongings pass down as I wish rather than having MY ESTATE turn into a long drawn-out process which can turn into arguments, debates and expensive court proceedings?

Is there a "default position" one would be taken through if one fails to take up authorship of ones claims and declarations?  What are Claims?  What are Declarations?  You must determine the answers to all these questions. Are you a Declarant or are you an Affiant?

Yes. there is a default position. It turns out that We Americans get presupposed into a whole host of various default positions which are purported to be enforced upon us without there really ever being any training, education or basic conversations -- never that I can remember.  I had to dig myself in to all of this to try getting up to speed with things this man was telling me to write this essay.

Many more questions arise.  You are best advised to get acquainted with your own private application of these words, otherwise if you fail at this, you too will have certain public default standings presumed upon you.

  1. What is meant by the words Public and Private?
  2. What is the purview of Attorney/Client matters? What prerogatives should you take note of?
  3. What about the Maxim of Law which states: Let him who is deceived be deceived.
  4. What is actually taking place when you see at least eight variations to your name in ALL CAPS?
    1. JOHN MICHAEL DOE (is this foreign?)(the Creditor?)(the Bank?)(Federal?)
    2. JOHN M DOE (is this domestic?)(the Debtor?)(the Taxpayer?)(State?)
    3. JOHN M. DOE
    4. JOHN DOE (is this ecclesiastic?)(the Soul?)(Church?)
    5. DOE, JOHN (is this a Land Claimant?)
    6. DOE, JOHN M (is this just some fancy clerical sorting by LAST NAME?)
    7. DOE, JOHN M. (the guy who thinks he's a homeowner but really isn't?)
    8. DOE, JOHN MICHAEL (Land or Automobiles?)
  5. Are these Foreign, or Domestic, or Non-Profit Entities? Are these Artificial Persons, Juristic or Statutory Persons? Are these 14th Amendment Creations of a "run amok" Federal Sub-Contractor? Is there an owner of these interposed or alleged or purported persons? Why are there at least six to eight variations depending upon who or what entity is presenting these variations in print? What does this have to do with your Probate and Estate? You had better find out, because word has it that thieves have stolen the American people's identities and taken them through undisclosed conversions due to various man-made circumstances occurring long before recent history. What is a Federal Sub-Contractor? That's easy: An entity created by an Entity that went on to create at least 50 inchoate sub-entities such as STATE OF MONTANA.
  6. What is a FIRST NAME? (a commerce term)
  7. What is a MIDDLE NAME? (a commerce term)
  8. What is a LAST NAME? (a commerce term)
  9. Contrast these ALL CAPS NAMES with your Given Name -- using the example "John Michael" is what Mom and Dad named their new son. Doe is the family name which John Michael inherits, so it is not actually part of his given name. The entire "John Michael Doe" all strung together equates to a kind of bastardizing or the making of a monster or a "Nom de guerre" which is the same thing as making a man-made new THING IDENTIFIED as an artificial construct. 
  10. Ask yourself: Are you a man or woman who owns yourself or are you a THING IDENTIFIED who gets to be claimed as "a Citizen" by some government agency? One in which "the Agency" automatically assumes that you must be one who is a consenting adult -- otherwise a willful subject of all codes, statutes, legislation, etc.
  11. Are you a RESIDENT? What is a RESIDENT? This is another colorable word of art. A RES means a "thing" and an IDENT means "identified" and a "PRESIDENT" is the principal agent of a Corporation. So by allowing yourself to be regarded as a RESIDENT/Resident/resident it would appear that you've actually acquiesced to a "tacit procuration" meaning some STATE OF STATE has taken over YOU/You/you in ways that will make your head spin and your bank accounts drain.
  12. What does the Crown have to do with any of this? i.e. The British Crown?
  13. Is the ALL CAPS NAMED foreign PERSON held as a resident of "The District" namely Washington D.C.?
  14. Who or what is ultimately the creditor? What is a Creditor? What is a Debtor? Are two PERSONS named to equally set-off claims, as in double-entry accounting ledgers?
  15. Is there a beneficial owner? Who gets to determine who is the owner? Who is the Trustee? Who is the Executor? Who is the Administrator? Who is the Beneficiary? Who is the Donor?
  16. Are these above entitled PERSONS/Persons/Persons either natural or artificial? Are these constructs denoted as COMMERCE VESSELS in public servant LEGAL CAPACITY in order to be LEGALLY COMPATIBLE with any or all of the "Corporations of Government"? This man has enough research to choke a horse -- which gives he and I both a definitive Yes to the Vessels (sea faring) question! Our previous American "Woodrow Wilson Administration" acted in collusion with International Bankers (namely Colonel Edward Mandel House) to put into effect a system of pledging and a method of chargeback to "help earn" the bankers various financial and land asset gains that would exceed their wildest expectations.
  17. What are Estates for? Are Estates foreign, domestic, public or private? Why have an Estate when those are far fancier words than simple everyday language such as "things I expect to pass down to my heirs"?
  18. Why is it, that all of a sudden during the "Barack H. Obama Administration" era, that we Americans suddenly all got our names put back to us with a Middle Initial? (e.g. SUSAN B. ANTHONY) What is really going on? Was this because the American establishment was entering bankruptcy again or was it because "We The People" had to re-emerge from a Banker-controlled demolition -- as different PERSONS identified? How did THEY/They do away with the old? Was this so the fiat currency charade could be continued? What does this have to do with Estate or Probate? I would submit to you that it has  everything to do with Estate and Probate and their Claims presumed upon you. There is a tremendous volume of information coming through "in the unsaid" which is ultimately left up to you to get informed and make appropriate decisions.
  19. Who, ultimately, are these Artificial Constructs for?  A couple of well-known groups seem to be waring for the dominion over you, and everything about you.   (Namely the Vatican / Pope / Holy Roman Empire and the United Kingdom's City of London and its Barristers)
  20. Can a U.S. Citizen actually own land in allodium or is he/she simply nothing more than a tenant?
  21. Why would you pay (be levied) a property tax (tribute) if you actually owned a property? We see that whenever you've accepted mail to your ADDRESS in completely ALL CAP LETTERS using a MN 55406 ZIP CODE, ad nauseum, that your CORPORATE SELF is in play Administratively. But you have no clue!
  22. Are these NAMES or Properties yours to own and control and fashion, or has some other THING taken them from you? By design? Planned long ago? 
  23. Were you a Donor of your Name?  Are you a supporter or a victim?
  24. How much can be told to you in the rushed moment of giving your baby its name?
  25. Why does your baby have to get itself a Social Security Number when it's got at least of couple of decades to grow up before even being qualified to be an Federal Person?
  26. How does this innocent child get contrived into an "artificially and mischievously created American U.S. Citizenship" when it, as a newborn, can't even put words together yet?
  27. How does a baby become responsible for decades and centuries old "war debts" when the American Government had its wherewithal to completed discharge said odious debts by at least 1941?
  28. In order for you to effectively "take control" of your various administrative functions in life, do you need to have several kinds of Attorneys at every step of the way, in order to distance and protect yourself from all the CORPORATIZATION that we see forced upon us daily?
  29. Given Name vs. Inherited Name vs. LEGAL NAME?
  30. What is a LEGAL NAME and why should we chase after this topic? Who gains? Who loses? What is at stake? Why have THEY/They/they done this to us? Why have a LEGAL NAME when at no time in your 20+ years of public education have you ever been fully informed of what in the heck is going on? Again: Who gains? Who benefits? Who loses? What can be lost? Who can be on the take without you even realizing you're being taken from? What can you protect? Why protect anything? Why even care?  Who cares? Who doesn't care? Why don't THEY/They/they care?
  31. What about your freedom? What about a Constitutional Republic and your role inside or outside the consent of the governed? Can you put a monetary value on any of this?
  32. What about The Organic Law For The United States of America -- which contains four components:
    1. The Declaration of Independence - July 4, 1776
    2. The Articles of Confederation - November 15, 1777
    3. The Northwest Ordinance - July 13, 1787
    4. The Constitution for the united States of America - September 17, 1787
  33. Is this all about Debt? Is it about Debt service? Indebtedness to whom or what?
  34. Is this all about Bankruptcy of the American Financial System, at the hands of International thug/creep/criminal cartels which played a large role in the overthrow of the American society during the years between 1826 and 1877? Evidence suggests the entire American confederacy was deliberately destroyed via commercial mercenaries which stood to secretly replace the Republic with an International banking/finance conglomerate bent on global dominion.
  35. Again: What does this have to do with Estate and Probate? Everything!  Why would you want to continue to be a subject of the shocking discovery brought to your attention in this essay? I sure wouldn't.

Another thing this man did was he went to the Estate Planning Law Firm which had agreed to send him their "Information Collection Forms" and he asked one seasoned Attorney a set of very pointed questions.

Saying point blank to the Attorney, that he does not consent to being governed by any State Agency, he asked the following simple yet detailed questions:

  1. Who / Why / Why / Where / When / How is there ever a Probate or Estate in the first place?
  2. Is this about bankruptcy? Is this about Debt? Is this about Capital? Is this about land held in allodium? Is this a matter for more than one kind of Attorney to address?
  3. How do I even make the necessary LEGAL DETERMINATION(s) before writing various information onto these Estate Planning Information Collection Forms?
  4. Who am I? Am I a man or am I some kind of thing? Who owns my "things" which I can see there are plural things being addressed in the mail, etc.?
  5. Am I a Donor, or a Beneficiary, or a Trustee, or am I presupposed into some role that hasn't even been disclosed to me?
  6. Why did the STATE take my Given Name and turn it into SOME THING where all the NAMES are changed to having the CAPS LOCK turned on?
  7. By what process was I apparently deemed to be "a Ward of The State" when I can never remember ever being trained to stop being a Ward of The State? Isn't a Ward another fancy term having multiple meanings?
  8. I am a retired man. What are the extents of the meaning and purpose for retirement?
  9. Does the fact that I want to make my Estate Plan mean that I am automatically assumed to be a voluntary transactor in commerce? Am I conducting a commercial undertaking by doing an Estate/Probate plan on paper?
  10. STATE OF MINNESOTA is printed on the BIRTH CERTIFIATE and what does that mean? Is this an Entity or Agency or Corporation or Trust or de jure or de facto? A Ceste-Que-Via Trust?
  11. What interest does this entity have in me and my life and things I own?
  12. How do I completely override being governed by an entity that is below me?
  13. Who is in command? The People who create a Government? Or the Government that got created by The People?
  14. How do I get recognized as a Self-governing Minnesotan?
  15. Do I get a differently styled name from these folks? And why? Who loses? Who gains? What is ultimately at stake? Is this about Debt or Bankruptcy? Is this about hiding behind a veil? Who's veil? How much should I budget for across my entire life to have a team of Legal People in all these matters of being a man, being born in America, having a lifestyle that wants to pursue happiness and freedom?
  16. What is a VITAL RECORD? Vital to who? Why? Is this done in order to determine how many people are needed to form representative government?  Are there other hidden or occulted purposes?
  17. What ulterior motives exist to have PROBATE / ESTATE and where did all of this talk originate? Was this topic European or German or Judean or from some Holy Roman Empire or some religious denomination? Is this topic Biblical or Ecclesiastic or Law Merchant?
  18. What is the Law Merchant?
  19. What discourse is deliberately not being taught to Americans?
  20. Undisclosed Procuration?
  21. False Claims in Commerce?
  22. Is there a fraud being committed to use LEGAL NAMES without having an Attorney be involved in whatever matter is at hand which seems to mandate use of a FULL LEGAL NAME?
  23. What is OFFICE OF STATE REGISTRAR all about? Again: Who/What/Why/Where/When/How
  24. Has a TRUST been established as evidenced by an ALL CAPS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
  25. After an in depth study of Trust entities we can see several roles
    1. Donor
    2. Beneficiary
    3. Trustee
    4. Executor
    5. Administrator
    6. Advisor
  26. How to enforce myself and my heirs to be regarded as The Direct Beneficiary?
  27. How to avoid Probate altogether? Certainly by having a duly executed and notarized and witnessed WILL AND TESTAMENT -- so that you don't suffer the woes of intestacy.
  28. What is Testate vs. Intestate? You had better figure this out and govern yourselves accordingly.
  29. Was there a value of some sort (either debt or capital) placed upon my body as an infant child?
  30. Was I supposed to be pledged as an asset to prop up a fiat financial system? If so who is the claimant? How can such claimant enforce such claim? Is this some position I happen to find myself in by no fault of my own? What is my remedy?  Can I find my remedy in Regulation Z?
  31. Am I an undisclosed adhesion under the Maternity Act? How about the Buck Act? Is slavery not already illegal globally?
  32. Can I lawfully revoke my consent to being governed? How? Would I sidestep this entire essay by simply cancelling my voter registration? When I am not registered to vote, who can construe that I must be some sort of Internal Citizen Person?  (Hint: Internal Revenue Service aka IRS)
  33. What did I do to make myself compatible to UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE?
  34. Are regular private American People automatically a party to the UCC?
  35. Do the current Courts in America change roles or jurisdictions during Court Proceedings
    1. Administrative
    2. Civil
    3. Criminal
    4. Admiralty
    5. Maritime
    6. Ecclesiastic
  36. Should I be doing a UCC-1 Financing Statement about ME for me? (the CAPS ME being The Thing Identified which is owned by the natural me?)
  37. How about MOTOR VEHICLE CODE? Isn't that code applicable to some sort of Commercial Vehicle used in the Transport of Goods or Services or Passengers or Property Owned or Claimed by an Entity in the practice of Commerce? Acting For Hire?   Subject to Legislation (aka Color of Law) when conducting commercial transactions for economic gain and profit over the people's roadways? Aren't all of our roadways technically considered to be multi-jurisdictional?  Simple answer is yes. The detailed answer  is: "You or I may not be qualified to make such legal determinations and would be best suited to take these issues to a qualified Attorney.

In the short amount of time the Attorney gave this man to consult about these topics, the two of them barely got through a few questions before the Attorney stood up to say, "I am sorry I can't help you. I am not qualified to address these concerns. I am not sure who to send you to. I suggest you contact the Law Library Discussion Group Clinic (at a very well known local Law University) to inquire if they are taking up innovations in addressing these topics. I don't have names or contacts in the plethora of legal topics you present. However I do completely agree with you that this whole system is a mess, and the situation applies to everyone, as this is the system we find ourselves in. I wish you the best of luck and you are welcomed to let me know how it goes and what you might learn.  The meeting ended with only four questions answered.

            1. I don't regard the STATE OF MINNESOTA as running some kind of trust. Can't say. Not sure.

            2. Your questions you bring up are going to involve more areas that Estate and Probate.

            3. Establishing a proper Will & Testament, Estate Plan is the only means to sidestep Probate Court. 

            4. Today's Legal System is moving on all affairs under the U.S. Gov't bankruptcy/receivership.

 

What the man did next, immediately following this meeting, was to contact the recommended local University Law Library. Upon discussing this topic with the clinic representative, the man asked one question:   Does the Law Library Clinic have any discussions about what it means to be born as a birthright Minnesotan but then to have the infant child identity to be administratively construed as a U.S. Citizen yet having nothing enforced or established to declare that the child is first a Citizen of the State, but then why even need a dual or national citizenship contrived on top of that? 

This is a detailed tough question, and yes, expectedly he received a cold dry response:  "I am sorry but your topic does not qualify for any discussion past or future to be held in this law clinic. Perhaps you would contact the next nearest larger University Law Library to inquire there." 

The man went on to say, "What a terrible tragedy that nobody is apparently being taught that Minnesota, as a Republic Nation State, having its own Constitution and Bill of Rights, entered the Union on equal footing to all other union States, recognized Internationally as a Nation State, yet this topic gets no attention while countless people are pilfered via Estate and Probate practices, all while we're none the wiser and Attorneys act clueless and unwilling to take any tough questions that expose the racket taking place 24/7/365?"   Lastly is was commented that "These are interesting things you're saying but sorry, not here. Have a nice day."

The man also contacted the next biggest University. Had an identical experience -- basic stonewalling.

He was referred to a possible Immigration and Citizenship Firm.

He contacted that firm as well only to then learn that a gigantic influx of Mexican and southern border immigration has been taking virtually all available resources to help naturalize the massive influx of immigrants to become automatic U.S. Citizen PERSONS with no regard to a valuable State Citizenship.

What does all of this have to do with Estate and Probate? 

It has everything to do with it. After reading all 5,705 words in this Essay it is my hope that you are able to see and recognize that something dramatic is at stake when you drill down into all the legalese.

Now after reading this far, are you too beginning to see what you need to do? 

I see for me what I am going to do. Read on as follows:

  1. Thou claimeth my "self" among the living as a true creator and law giver and law interpreter
  2. My goal is to renounce the entire LEGAL SYSTEM as a biblical brood of vipers having no actual necessary application to living men and women. They [the System] have created for itself a monstrosity which I am gladly not a commercial party to in any way.
  3. Rising up to renounce all claims of ownership over me, I claim ownership of all my assets, my labor, my property, my earnings, my money, my possessions, my belongings, my debts, my obligations, my rights, and I make very certain to place these claims in electronic digital format where anyone can see that I am my own man and I make no false claims in commerce that I am a subject entity to any thing de facto or de jure. No artificial entity created me. Any artificial entity which bears a name spelled with the same lettering as my name does not automatically mean that thing is me.
  4. Since an entity such as STATE OF MINNESOTA seems to think I want to be a subject of its rhetoric/legislation/codes/statues/etc. then the time has come for [IT] to pony up the enormous costs I can foresee in having to defend my several SELVES (Foreign / Domestic / Non-Profit / Land) from unwanted and undisclosed and unwelcome trespass
  5. I am a living natural man; there is nothing artificial about my natural sentient consciousness.
  6. Am I supposed to throw up or stand-up various veils? Various artificial constructs to stand behind as a protective cloak? Teach me and finance those costs since they've made this mess! 
  7. Am I supposed to have incorporated myself, running down to the Secretary of State Office and filing Incorporation Registrations to make myself (all the selves) into owned property that takes on Bankruptcy Protection as do Corporations?  I would have to keep all of that administrative work in good standing. 
  8. Otherwise, Who/What/How is a STATE GOVERNMENT attached onto my back? How can the STATE DIETY construe that I owe it any such performance guarantee? Did I enter some undisclosed contract?
  9. How strong is my Express Reservation of Rights when I write "Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 / 1-207" near my autograph? How important is this that I never again "Sign" anything and never again put my "Signature" on any document especially given this entire essay contains so many topics and words that never come to us with any full disclosure of the true nature? What is The True Nature? 

Leave nothing to chance.

Stay out of Commerce.

Protect your valuables.

Learn who you are.

Learn and declare what you are. Know and declare what you are not.

Don't assume your SELF/Self/self to be some THING/Thing/thing that you are not.

Question everything -- Make no assumptions. Look in to the words. Determine how many meanings can hoodwink you. Something (topics/surroundings) that has been under your nose your entire life does not make this honest or equitable or forthright. Remember - America is a Republic if we can keep it.

Estate Planning -- Done correctly, the documents put in force helps you completely avoid probate. Do this with a clean mind, good information, a written will, a set of eyewitnesses, and a Public Notary present to authenticate your writings inside the official Notary Jurat at the bottom of your pages. Perhaps once my own Will And Testament is finished, I will publish to my website at unrulystatesofaffairs.com and my blog at hotcityjimmy.wordpress.com

Take care! Go in peace! Thank this man for being so observant!

 

 

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of DebtThe Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN