Spooky Times When Living In The Private Sector
By: JaMes CreAtive
If a "man" goes to his friend's house for a month or so or maybe more but has not entered a U.S.P.S. CHANGE OF ADDRESS and later a different party he knows sends mail for him at that new "physical address" what will happen to this newly addressed mailing piece?
Why ask this? Does he want to rebel against the system which is so wonderfully here to help him?
Is that possibly happening in his life?
Perhaps he owes nothing to anyone and values his freedom and privacy
Whenever a "person" temporarily stays at a friend's house for a month or even through a winter or so, without submitting a U.S. Postal Service (USPS) change of address form, any new mail sent to him at that temporary address is technically misdelivered or handled as mail for an unknown/unlisted resident at that delivery point.
It should still arrive there if the postal carrier has two nickles to rub together inside their brain.
Based on official postal procedures and regulations outlined in the U.S. Postal Service guidelines, here is what typically happens to that newly addressed mailing piece:
Delivery to the Address:
If the mail carrier sees the individual's name on the envelope and assumes s/he receives mail there—or if the carrier simply delivers all mail bearing that street address to the mailbox—the letter will be placed in the friend's mailbox.
Action by the Resident:
Because the wo/man has not filed a temporary change of address with the USPS, his/her name is not officially registered in the postal database for that specific address as a current resident.
However CURRENT RESIDENT mailings from ALL BUSINESS ENTITIES being dropped there are beside the point!
If the homeowner or the friend recognize that the PERSON does not officially receive regular mail there (or if they are strict about matching names), they are instructed by postal guidelines to write "Not at this address" or "Return to Sender" on the envelope and place it back in the mailbox for pickup.
Return to Sender:
Once the postal carrier retrieves the marked mailing piece, it will be processed and sent back to the original sender.
Because no temporary or permanent forwarding order exists in the USPS system for that name at that address, the POST OFFICE cannot redirect it anywhere else.
It is important to note that opening mail not addressed to YOU is a federal offense under U.S. LAW, even if it arrives at a home where you are currently staying, unless you have given explicit permission for that PERSON to open your mail.
If a temporary guest is expecting important correspondence while away from your home for a month, standard practice is for them to either set up a temporary USPS change of address (which covers durations from 15 days up to 1 year) or have mail sent to a secure alternative location.
Tell me the legal difference between the words: man, person. This is another private guy topic.
To understand the legal distinction between the words "man" and "person," one must examine the foundations of statutory interpretation, common law, and jurisprudence. In everyday language, these terms are often used interchangeably, but in the architecture of law, they occupy entirely different categories.
1. Definitions from Legal Dictionaries
Legal lexicons make a sharp demarcation between a physical human being and a legal entity:
Man (Natural Person):
Historically and biologically, a "man" refers to a human being, a living soul of flesh and blood. In classic common law, natural beings possess inherent "natural rights."
However, the naked word "man" rarely appears as a technical term of art in modern statutory codes except when distinguishing gender or referencing human biology.
Person (Legal/Artificial Person):
In legal terminology, a "person" is a legal term of art defined by statute. According to the Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage and standard legal dictionaries like Black’s Law Dictionary, a "person" includes not just human beings (natural persons), but also corporations, partnerships, associations, trusts, and government agencies (artificial or juridical persons).
2. Statutory Inclusion vs. Biological Reality
When a legislature writes a law (such as a tax code, a motor vehicle statute, or a criminal code), it typically includes a "definitions" section.
Statutes almost universally define "PERSON" to include both human beings and corporate/artificial entities. Therefore, in the eyes of statutory law, a human being is only subject to a specific regulation if they fall under the statutory definition of a "PERSON" within that specific code. Jurisprudence establishes that a "PERSON" is a creature of statute; the law creates the LEGAL capacity, duties, and liabilities attached to that status. Now it seems that nearly no ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE will ever consistently act this way from THE BENCH.
3. The Distinction in Sovereignty and Jurisprudence
In certain legal philosophies—particularly those concerning constitutional rights and historical common law—a profound distinction is drawn between the living human and the LEGAL FICTION:
The Natural Being ("man"):
Operates under common law, where rights are viewed as pre-existing, unalienable, and dependent on direct harm, contracts, or torts between living people.
The Legal Entity ("PERSON"):
Operates under statutory, commercial, and administrative law. When an individual interacts with administrative agencies, fills out government forms, acquires a social security number, or registers a postal address, they frequently interact with the system in the capacity of a legal person (a taxpayer, a licensee, a registrant).
As noted in foundational legal treatises such as Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, municipal and civil laws are crafted to govern legal relations, and they assign the status of "personhood" to grant capacities (such as the ability to sue, own property, or enter contracts) while simultaneously binding that entity to statutory regulations.
4. Person is open for business. Keep a payment method at the ready.
Persons can sue and be sued.
Persons may startup statutory legal fiction.
Persons do business.
Persons can exercise bankruptcy protection.
PERSONS are COMMERCIAL.
Persons purchase as Customers.
What is done with a purchase is assumed to be another sale or brokering at a later time.
Did your PERSON "sell" that bag of groceries to your "man"? Won't those "receipts" tell the story? Hmmm.
Paid for using diminished fiat means that only an increasing debt acquired those dwindling resources.
Now what? Your ESTATE may still have to account for that in PROBATE COURT after you've passed away.
Concerning Administrative Law
What is the name of The Rules of Administrative Procedure promulgated by the Administrative Procedures Act (APA)? You know, the procedural rules to defend one's self in Administrative Law Courts?
Turns out that in United States (U.S.) Administrative Law, the primary set of procedural rules governing how federal agencies adjudicate matters, conduct hearings, and issue orders is known as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), codified primarily at 5 U.S.C. §§ 551–559, 701–706.
Unlike judicial courts, which operate under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, administrative agencies operate under the APA alongside their own agency-specific rules of practice and procedure.
Key Aspects of Administrative Procedure
- The Administrative Procedure Act (APA): Enacted in 1946, the APA is the foundational statute governing how federal administrative agencies propose and establish regulations (rule-making) and adjudicate disputes (adjudication). It sets the baseline standards for due process, public notice, the right to present evidence, and the availability of judicial review in federal court.
- Agency-Specific Rules of Practice: Because the APA provides a broad framework, every federal agency (such as the Social Security Administration, the IRS, or the Environmental Protection Agency) promulgates its own specific Rules of Practice and Procedure. These internal regulations dictate the exact mechanics of defending oneself, filing motions, submitting evidence, and appearing before administrative law judges (ALJs). These agency rules are typically published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
- Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJs): Administrative hearings are typically presided over by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) rather than an Article III federal judge. While these proceedings resemble trials—featuring witness testimony, cross-examination, and evidentiary exhibits—they are governed by the more flexible rules of administrative due process rather than strict judicial courtroom rules.
For the STATE DISTRICT COURTS, how about their version?
In state-level judicial systems, the procedural rules that govern civil lawsuits, criminal prosecutions, and general proceedings in state district courts (often referred to as trial courts, superior courts, or courts of common pleas) are known as the State Rules of Civil Procedure and State Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Unlike administrative agencies or federal courts, state district courts are courts of general jurisdiction, meaning they handle the vast majority of everyday legal disputes—such as contract breaches, property disputes, family law, torts, and state-level criminal or civil offenses.
Key Characteristics of State District Court Rules
- State Civil and Criminal Procedure: Nearly every U.S. state has adopted its own set of procedural rules, frequently modeled directly after the federal rules (the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure). For example, a state might have the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the California Rules of Court, or the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR).
- Rules of Evidence: Alongside procedural rules, state district courts operate under strict State Rules of Evidence (often mirroring the Federal Rules of Evidence). These rules dictate what kind of testimony, documents, and physical exhibits can be admitted into court during a hearing or trial.
- Local Court Rules: In addition to statewide procedural rules, individual judicial districts or county courts often issue Local Court Rules. These local rules govern administrative details such as specific scheduling timelines, electronic filing requirements, courtroom decorum, and motion-practice schedules unique to that specific district judge or courthouse.
To defend oneself or navigate a state district court, a litigant must consult the specific state's compiled statutes, the state's rules of civil/criminal procedure, and the local rules of that specific judicial district.
It is a fancy way of saying that THE COURTS and PROSECUTORS get to make it up as they go and to color it in a way that seems most beneficial to the BENCH/BAR/BANK and a very difficult fight for the DEFENSE.
How about a Common Law Rulebook for private men and women who haven't mistakenly invoked their PERSONHOOD?
In traditional legal history and jurisprudence, there is no single, codified "common law rulebook" that applies exclusively to living human beings ("men and women") operating outside of statutory or civil status, primarily because the common law itself is uncodified.
Unlike statutory law—which is written down by legislatures into comprehensive codes (like the U.S. Code or the Code of Federal Regulations)—the common law is judge-made law derived from centuries of English and American judicial precedent, custom, and legal maxims.
The Nature of Common Law
Historically, the common law was developed through court opinions, treatises, and legal commentaries rather than a published statute book or manual. When individuals historically sought to invoke common-law remedies or defend their rights outside of statutory frameworks, they did not look to a rulebook; instead, they relied on foundational legal principles, historical writs, and established maxims.
The Role of Legal Treatises:
Rather than a rulebook, historical practitioners and scholars looked to authoritative legal treatises such as Sir Edward Coke’s Institutes of the Laws of England, Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, and Matthew Bacon’s A New Abridgment of the Law.
These multi-volume works compiled centuries of judicial decisions regarding property, contracts, torts (wrongs), and personal security.
Maxims of Law:
Common law jurisprudence heavily relies on legal maxims—short, concise statements of established legal principles that reflect fundamental equity and reason. Examples often cited in historical legal compendiums include principles such as actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea (the act does not make a person guilty unless the mind is guilty) and that remedies exist for every injury.
The Distinction of "Personhood" in Common Law:
In historical common law, the terms "man," "citizen," "subject," and "person" were largely synonymous within the context of legal rights and duties; the modern philosophical distinction between a biological human and a legal "person" stems more from modern administrative and statutory interpretations rather than classical common-law pleading, where any living human possessing legal capacity was recognized as a party capable of suing, being sued, or holding property.
In contemporary legal systems, attempting to operate entirely outside of statutory frameworks or civil rules in a modern court generally encounters significant procedural hurdles, as modern courts derive their jurisdiction and operational procedures strictly from constitutions, legislative statutes, and promulgated rules of court.
As I'm eating some food and giving this some thought . . .
I'm at another "Aha!" moment.
Private poor people deciding to be homeless and living under a bridge or inside a cardboard box nearby their wilderness hunting and fishing campsites may get into trouble for vagrant ordinances. Then what?
Therein lies a big clue.
Lawfare 101.
Pesky lawyers! I'm just sayin!
FAT CATS! Pick on someone your own size!
There has to be a win-win in there somewhere, right?
Not the continual win-lose and more lose-lose.
Historically I Have Been Known As Jimmy Driller, as I love to drill deeper. Getting my mail isn't too deep of a topic now is it?
Print to the screen for me, what does a NAMED POSTAL ENTITY appear like on an address block?
A named postal entity is usually shown as the city/town line in an address block, like this:
Here, Springfield is the named postal entity.
Ah, but have we forgotten that USPS turns on the CAPS LOCK 100% of the time now? Try again.
Are we certain the last line is USA from now on?
No. In a US domestic address, the country line is usually omitted. It would more typically end like this:
How about when anyone goes to the County Recorder's Office to access the free public records lookup terminal, when searching for a 'Person' named 'John Smith' nothing is found. However searching for an 'ENTITY' as 'JOHN SMITH' everything now comes up as itemized lists of records?
That suggests the system is distinguishing between a Person Record and a LEGAL/ENTITY-STYLE RECORD, and the UPPERCASE FORMAT is being used as the ENTITY search key.
A reasonable address-block style example for a named entity would be:
Aha! Bingo! So JOHN SMITH is an entity! It has taken a very long time to get such an admission.
If we want, we can also show how that differs from a normal personal mailing address block.
Yes, please show how that differs from a normal personal mailing address block.
A normal personal mailing address block is usually written in standard title case:
An entity-style block is often rendered in all caps and may omit the comma:
The main differences are capitalization and punctuation and see below what special powers exist.
Explain why mail addressed in this manner would be returned to sender address unknown:
john smith
123 main street
springfield, illinois 62704
Missing a pair of nickels to rub together in the ole' noggin there, sir lettercarrier?
It could be returned because it doesn’t match the mailing format that sorting and delivery systems expect, especially if the name, street, city, or state are entered inconsistently or don’t match a valid delivery point.
Your example would be better as:
Also, “RETURN TO SENDER / ADDRESS UNKNOWN” usually means the carrier couldn’t verify a deliverable recipient at that address, not that the carrier is being careless.
What is invalid here, as DO THEY NOT ALL GIVE THE SAME INFORMATION?:
john smith
123 main street
springfield, illinois 62704
JOHN SMITH
123 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD IL 62704
John Smith
123 Main Street
Springfield, IL 62704
Nothing is invalid there. They all convey the same basic delivery information.
The differences are only formatting:
IllinoisvsIL- comma vs no comma
- lowercase vs uppercase
- title case vs all caps
For a standard U.S. mailing address, the most conventional version is:
The all-caps version is also commonly accepted.
Now, for this entire conversation, let's caption all of it for BAR CARD carrying LEGAL SYSTEM purveyors.
Why do DISTRICT COURTS mix up and alternate between styles across every document pack they put out?
Because different templates, clerks, filing systems, and OCR/export workflows produce different capitalization and formatting. Courts often prioritize internal processing and document-source conventions over consistent visual style, so you’ll see mixed title case, all caps, and punctuation differences across packs.
If we want, we can show the most common reasons that happens in plain English.
How can a common man enforce exemption from all of this to completely stop emanating as some sort of STORE FRONT ENTITY to just maintain his household as a private common man closed for business?
You generally can’t “opt out” of legal identity or public-record systems by declaration alone. If your goal is to keep your household private and non-commercial, the practical path is:
- use your personal legal name consistently, which would be 'James Allen Homyak' in the equivalent for USOA Publisher, unincorporated
- avoid registering a business unless you actually need one
- don’t commingle personal and business finances
- use a P.O. box or mail service if you want your home address less exposed
- review public-record settings where available
- if a specific agency is misclassifying you, ask for a written correction procedure
- never attempt to file for bankruptcy
- avoid licenses, permits and registrations as much as humanly possible
If wanted, you draft a simple statement to use for mailing or records correction that stays factual and non-argumentative.
Help me draft a simple statement to use for mailing or records correction that stays factual and non-argumentative.
Here’s a simple factual version:
If you want it softer:
Can't we also change that word 'residential' to 'household' or 'domicile' to be even less like some THING being arbitrarily planted for a short time? Even a DOCTOR may have 'residence' in a hospital for any given time being.
Yes — if you want to sound more neutral and less technical, household is the safest choice.
Try:
If you want it even simpler:
I’d avoid domicile unless you’re specifically dealing with a legal form or record that uses that word, since it can sound more formal and legalistic.
Moral to the story: Wherever there is money to be garnered from you by corporations or lawyers, you're not going be living very easily in the private.
Look up Kurt Kallenbach for more similar entertainment regarding the ironies that we have never been trained in for self defense.
