Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

The Actual Factual States

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

International Public Notice: The End of Legacy Trusts and the Great Fraud

http://annavonreitz.com/endoflegacytrusts.pdf

 

International Public Notice: The End of Legacy Trusts and the Great Fraud

By: Anna Von Reitz

Let it be known that "salvaged" biological materials, whether dead placentas, mucus on a used tissue paper discarded in a trash bin, or similar biological detritus, is nothing that can provide a valid claim against the living people this waste material came from.

The placenta is not a living being. It is not able to sustain life on its own. That is why it "dies" --- to the extent that it ever lived.

Likewise, other cast off biological material, for example, DNA on a bloody bandage, is not available for salvage and cannot be latched upon by any person or legal fiction entity.

Anyone caught advancing these false "salvage" claims in Admiralty or in commerce or any other form of law is participating in unlawful, illegal, and immoral latching.

Each one of us comes into this world gifted with a unique biological heritage and identity, right down to our own thumbprints, and we are all given a name, too. These gifts are ours, and theft of a gift is no less an act of theft, than the theft of something we created or earned.

In the same way, undisclosed alteration of the human genome via the injection of genetically engineered and patented scraps of genetic material does not provide any means to claim an ownership interest in any living man or woman anywhere on Earth. The Perpetrators may own a scrap of patented mRNA or DNA, but they do not own any appreciable portion of the divine creation.

We accuse, here and now, the members of the Bar Associations worldwide of participating in deliberate and premeditated crimes of personage and barratry and racketeering against humanity. We accuse, here and now, the British Crown of knowingly providing enforcement for a system of peonage and slavery that has been outlawed worldwide since 1926.

All families are instructed to publish the birth announcements of their children in local newspapers and to record it in their family Bibles or equivalent private records and create such documentation -- witness testimony, photographs, etc., as necessary to establish where and when their babies are born.

All claims by corporations against the living flesh and the Given Names of living people which have been established without full disclosure and all seven requirements of lawful contract, are null and void for fraud and non-disclosure.

The courts and court officers engaged in making and enforcing these venal claims are engaged in crimes of personage, barratry, illegal latching, identitytheft, and racketeering.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AuMGXiAUnM

Fraud vitiates everything, and all are owed equal protection. A known fraudulent process may not be allowed to continue.

Nobody reading this has been lawfully or legally removed from the land and soil jurisdiction they are heir to, because in no case have the obligations of personhood been fully disclosed and consciously agreed to without coercion.

Codes, acts of legislatures, regulations, and statutes apply to persons, not living men, and conditions of personhood must be entered into knowingly, willingly, consciously, and without duress --- not foisted off via unconscionable contracts imposed on babies in their cradles or via secretive non-disclosed salvage of waste biological materials.

Who wants to stand up and take responsibility for these salvage claims?

Where is the person or institution accountable for defrauding and denigrating the people of this world?

The fraud now stands upon the public record thanks to the efforts of Govinda Tidbal and others. The "legacy trust" system is as dead as the placentas that were used to promote this scheme.

The perpetrators, public employees working for government subcontractors, illegally latched upon the natural assets of our babies---including their Given Names--- and "redefined" them as a thing, a corporation, merely named after them, as a ruse to promote deceit and subject them to foreign forms of law.

This is a crime known as unlawful conversion. It is also a form of identity theft and impersonation, that supports illegal takings and confiscations of actual assets. These are all white-collar crimes committed against babies in their cradles.

And now, as this 1700 year-old fraud is unraveling, they are responding with attempts to impose fraudulent court processes.

Be aware that any and all summons, orders, judgments, etc. that are addressed to any entity using what appears to be a middle initial are fraudulent on their face and void for vagueness.

You can all see this for yourselves. When you see "Charles C Brown" are we addressing Charles Christopher Brown? Charles Crispin Brown? Charles Chapeau Brown? Is that "C" even a middle initial, or just a letter used to create a different corporation name that is being presumed to exist and have something to do with you?

These practices and procedures have nothing to do with any lawful or legal court proceedings at all. They are fraud on the face of the documents being presented and any court proceedings resulting from them are fraudulent, too.

Also be aware that the "public trust estates" resulting from this illegal latching and purloining of your assets almost from the time of your birth has had other results.

They have not enslaved us directly, but have instead done it by proxy, using fictitious intestate public trust estates as a means to commandeer and use and control our assets for their benefit instead of ours.

They have literally forced us under armed threat and duress to pay their taxes for them and misidentified us as the "debtors" responsible for paying for their spending of our credit.

Imagine a credit card hacker secretly obtaining access to your identity and charging your card to the limit, and then turning around and suing you in court, under the pretense that you are responsible for his spending? Imagine a criminal actor wearing a mask and made up to look just like you, committing crimes, so that you get blamed for them?

This is what we have been dealing with, unknowingly, for 160 years, and what people in Europe and other diverse places, put up with for far longer than this.

Governor Dunleavy and his Administration in Alaska are simply among the first to get the news that this entire criminal system and the criminal courts and the False Claims in commerce that have supported it, are finished.

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS:

Our courts are competent to judge both the law and the facts and we have done so.

All operators both public and private must immediately and permanently cease and desist all court practices and procedures, policies, pretenses, and presumptions based on the impersonation of living men and women, and must also cease and desist from processing and enforcing commercial claims and municipal tax claims and liens tainted by this fraud against the living people.

Securitization of the living by proxy creation of legal fiction poppets is an act of black magic and necromancy repugnant to law and Nature, and by Maxim of Law: 'A person who does a thing through the instrumentality of another, is held as having done it himself." – In Latin: 'qui facit per alium facit per se'.

It does not matter if that instrumentality is alive or dead; the justice and jurisprudence is the same.

There is no relief available to the State of Alaska, Inc. as a result of using the Municipal STATE OF ALASKA, INC, to do its dirty work, to bring false claims in commerce against the living, nor for their combined trespasses into the realm of the living; and the same is true for all federal, territorial, and municipal franchises ---including while not being limited to the courts, councils, commissions, boards, authorities, committees, congresses, directorships, titles, copyrights, and patents operated by these corporations for purposes of fraud, unjust enrichment, and racketeering under color of law.

Remedy and restitution is ordered for all victims of this fraud against humanity effective immediately. All taxes and other charges disguised as "taxes" alleged and collected against the living people must be returned to them as prepaid credit plus reasonable and customary interest; all mortgages and mortgage payments must also be reverted and returned as prepaid credit, plus interest.

Homes and houses and land and business facilities seized upon under the False Pretense of debt created by this Great Fraud must be returned if they have been seized upon, despite their resale to new owners following tax sales and similar actions predicated on tainted and fictional claims of debt.

Two wrongs may not make a right, but justice in the face of fraud will not wait. Full estoppel has been reached.

The living people of this country that all these "persons" are obligated to serve in "good faith" are present and accounted for and standing as the heirs of their own patrimony.

All licenses issued under the false presumptions created by this vast fraud Scheme are terminated without recourse; henceforth, all licenses, certificates, securities, leases, notes, mortgages, loan documents, "pledges", identifications, passports and other documents issued under the taint of this fraud against humanity is viable evidence of the crime(s) committed, the identities of the victims, and the duty owed to provide remedy to them, but shall not be used to convert a right into a privilege or be used to compel any service or limit any occupation of common right or do anything but
extinguish claims of indebtedness being held against the living people.

Marriages will no longer be interpreted as licensed Joint Ventures and no business entity may assume a Silent Partnership or ownership interest in any such Joint Venture or its "products". Marriage is a private and ecclesiastical matter, protected and guaranteed to the living, not subject to any claim made by any commercial or municipal corporation whatsoever, even if it may be an incorporated church, synagogue, mosque or temple.

So said, so signed, so sealed and affirmed under jurat this 10th day of the month of October in the year known as two thousand twenty-five and also delegated as October 10, 2025, and as numerated 10 October 2025, and as 10/10/2025 and is hereby implemented within all species of time and law and jurisdiction without recourse.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United State of America
Chief Justice
The Alaska Supreme Court
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
October 10th 2025
------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

Also carried on Paul Stramer's Lincoln County Watch newsletter where any one may subscribe to this prolific and well-informed authority. 

 

Details
Category: a government of the people, by the people, and for the people
Hits: 253

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content

Similar Items