Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

Peace has been declared in America in the wake of the "so-called" Civil War happening illegally during the 1860's. . . and to help prevent future civil or mercenary conflicts

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

Take-down of All False Taxation In Pursuit of Happiness

 

By: Crazy Jim James

April 4, 2025

An Illustration: Which do you aspire to be?

Let's say for a moment that you are a business owner, but yet you've got NOTHING TO DO WITH any government agency in your small business.  Your patrons are private people. You have these conversations too, just to know who you're dealing with.

In the doing of whatever you do -- and let's just say, for example, you specialize in any kind of hands-on consulting -- where you haven't been and don't plan to become a Federal or State Agency upon the property at which your business helps your private patrons. 

Does any of this describe you privately and your private business?   

Well, well, well....  That totally describes one of the several private capacities I've stood within too -- in the past.

So here comes my list of poignant questioning:

  1. Are you the STATE OF WISCONSIN?  (fill your STATE name in here)

  2. Are you the UNITED STATES? 

  3. Are you the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?

  4. Did you know that in having a "Federal Tax ID Number" for your Company, this means only two points:  1.) Your "Company" may provide its "products or services" to Federal Persons or aka Federal Entities or aka Federal contracts?  2.) Your Company has a banking relationship somewhere for which you've applied the given TIN to open and hold  such account.  That's it! 

  5. Did you know that you can post a sign at your place of business which reads "This Business does NOT provide its services to any Federal PERSONS. If you are a FEDERAL PERSON and require services, please take your business elsewhere."

  6. Did you know that the POST SERVICE ADDRESSING of your private business places your business inside the FEDERAL ZONE, according to this example:

    JOHN'S CAR CARE
    2467 RICE RD SE
    FREEDOM LAKE MS 23456

    Right Under Your Noses:        FREEDOM LAKE MS 23456

    Styled in this manner, this hidden scam denotes the ZIP Code which is the exact nature of the FEDERAL ZONE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - which helps to address all parties and all PERSONS inside of the Federal Zone, and makes this information machine readable as they high-speed scan all mail from where is comes from and where it goes to.

  7. Did you know that if you re-address your former PERSON ADDRESS as a natural common man in Proper Name Style and place your identity back onto the land and soil of your home state and take your NAME outside the UNITED STATES that you gain back a huge degree of freedom? 

    John's Car Care
    Twenty-four Sixty-seven Rice Road Southeast
    Freedom Lake, Mississippi
    The United States of America
    General Postal Code 23456   
     
  8. Did you know that if you claim to be a LEGAL U.S. RESIDENT that you have just said you also fully consent to the full obligations of the FEDERAL TAXATION systems?

  9. Did you know that for any given Income Tax Year, that the W4 opens the contract with the Internal Revenue Service and/or the IRS, and that the 1040 closes that tax year -- and that these two documents work together in a paired up situtation?

    By using these FEDERAL FORMS, your filing documents a "reporting" that you must obviously be a FEDERAL PERSON --- the filing with a listed CAPS NAME and a TIN tells these Agencies that you are allowed to lie and claim that you are doing Federal Related business and that you love to report about this and that you'll be gladly sending in the payment due or gladly excepting the refund back if one is due back to your business.

 

If you have answered No Way! to any of these questions, then how about you STOP reporting as if you are these above capacities on top of these Federal Zones?

Read and study this next website for a lot more ammo in your defense against the offensive and fraudulent taxation that comes by way of fraudulent and unratified Constitutional Amendments.

https://weissparis.com/

As always, don't just take our word for it. Do your own homework to disprove the voluntarily faked standings that you've gotten propped up under. You'e likely been just as conned as I once was to voluteer myself into huge amounts of fraud and giving away that which belongs to you. 

Would you like to permanently leave the “U.S. Tax Club”?

The U.S. Congress has provided an option for all Americans to terminate the election they made when they initially filed a Form 1040 income tax return. The Revocation of Election eliminates any requirement to file a Form 1040.

Revocation of Election

Did you receive a letter for Notice of Deficiency/Tax Lien/Intent to Levy?

We may be able to obtain a Dismissal from the U.S. Tax Court.

If you have received one or more of these letters, then Weiss+Associates can help.

At their website, click the appropriate box shown to find more information on their services.

For a Notice of Deficiency, you have likely received either a Letter 3219, Letter 3219N, Letter 950DO or Letter 1862.

For a Notice of Federal Tax Lien, you have likely received a Form 668(Y).

For a Notice of Intent to Levy, you have likely received a Letter 1058 or a Letter LT11.

If you qualify for Weiss+Associates services, you can fight this enforcement action without having to hire an attorney or appear in court.

You simply use the mail to send correspondence to the Tax Court. And qualified candidates receive a 100% Money Back Guarantee that we will obtain a Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction from the USTC. 

Time is critical on each of these actions to take this to Tax Court.

So you need to act NOW!

 

Let's arise and cut their multi-billion dollar collections -- at these lying cheating IRS taxation bullies -- as we know that collected tax revenue adds up to huge foreign aid slush funds leading to absolute crime and evil done in the names of hoodwinked Americans who don't even know any better. 

The Unruly States of Affairs website is for educational purposes only and shall not in any way be construed as advice by a licensed professional.

USOA does not dispense legal or financial advice. We would never want to be licensed to do so.

USOA are not tax preparers in any way, and the educational and entertaining contents state clearly that USOA will not interfere with those who genuinely have an obligation to file and pay the U.S. Federal Income Tax.

Readers are responsible for filing/correcting forms/data that reflects any particular true and honest situations.

Since the following are complex areas requiring specialized knowledge, USOA would not seek to offer assistance with:

  • State income tax issues;

  • Income tax issues with any country other than the United States:

  • Property tax issues:

  • Issues with real estate transactions or mortgages;

  • Social Security issues;

  • Medicare, Medicaid, ACA or Obamacare issues;

  • UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) issues;

  • Issues with credit-reporting agencies;|

  • Issues with retirement accounts, pensions and annuities, meaning only you or your professional counsel can help you evaluate or recommend any particular legal fiction for use, benefits, purpose of their creation, ranking of importance, discuss their use or benefits purported by those who create such legal fictions;

  • Issues with employer applications;

  • Ramifications of court decisions already rendered;

  • Assistance in setting up domestic bank accounts, or setting up a new business entity of any sort;

  • Assistance with driver licenses or voter registration cards (rescinding or changing information);

  • Financial ramifications regarding divorce, bankruptcies, child support, fiduciary relationships and other issues not directly related to the federal income tax;

Also, the educational sarcasm, satire, mind-opening commentary and fun times that we provide here at USOA, as well as the content at Weiss+Associates are for human beings only, not U.S.-created legal fictions such as corporations, trusts, partnerships, etc. 

USOA may very likely cover those concepts in other happiness dialogs as time permits.

 

 

Details
Category: Federal Record
Hits: 289

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content

Similar Items