Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

Recent Discoveries

USOA Latest Content

Portal Home

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

The Only Legal Entity You'll Ever Need

 

 

The Only Legal Entity You'll Ever Need

By: Seth Harris and Jim Homyak

Dear Sovereign Surveyors of Spiritual Serenity;

You've been working hard, building savings, property, or a business, yet everything still sits exposed in your personal name (such as that ALL CAPS moniker you think is yours that you keep seeing printed in so-called official locations) or in a fragile statutory structure. One lawsuit, one aggressive agency letter, or one economic upheaval can suddenly put what you thought was “yours” on the table for others (namely vultures and predators) to pick apart and gain, perhaps, some just enrichment but also very likely some unjust enrichment.

Probate courts, tax authorities, and creditors do not care how long it took you to build what you have. They only care about what is visible, ownable, and reachable under statutory law. If your assets are structured the way most people’s are, they are far easier to reach than you might think.

Most people trust statutory entities simply because that’s all they’ve ever been shown. Corporations, LLCs, and nonprofit foundations live inside a world of millions of ever-changing statutes that no single person can fully understand or keep up with. Those entities must continually file, report, and re-justify their existence to keep their benefits, and those benefits can be revoked at any time. Behind the scenes, lawyers and agencies use this complexity to keep you dependent, paying fees, filing forms, and asking permission. It’s like the bugs in the jar that eventually stop trying to escape, even when the lid is removed.

That is because lawyers in particular live under what is know as "maxims of law" and chief among these is this maxim:  "Let him who is deceived, be deceived."  Think about this as long as needed to let it sink in.  Does it help you comprehend why an attorney or lawyer or counselor at law will advise you to be quiet, admit to nothing and never sign anything? 

What Can Go Wrong, Will

 

The real pain doesn’t usually show up until something goes wrong. A malpractice suit, a car accident, a disgruntled employee, a failed business, a divorce, or a creditor judgment can suddenly turn “your” home, “your” savings, and “your” investments into an open buffet for claims. When you die, your family can be dragged through probate, delays, and inheritance taxes, while outsiders comb through your ESTATE - which is a disaster as you can learn in other reports at the USOA website.   

Chief among the disaster of your ESTATE is that you have never in your entire life been taught or told that,  if your name were John William Doe, your ESTATE would actually be self-titled as the JOHN WILLIAM DOE ESTATE - which is a statutory enterprise wholly owned and operated by the administrative STATE which received a BIRTH CERTIFICATE APPLICATION DOCUMENT signed by your mom (usually) which has taken your identity and commercialized and monetized "the NAME" into the FAKE FIAT CURRENCY COLLATERALIZATION and later a HYPOTHECATION which we've all also been forced to use for 100+ years. None of these facts were ever disclosed to you, because, #1 you were a tiny baby, and #2. the Hospital Administrator had no idea what was really taking place internationally with your newborn identity. 

Buying anything with that unbacked FIAT MONEY (you know, FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES) instantly means that you never really bought or paid for anything.  Instead you passed debt notes to the seller and took actual goods or services in hand while the seller was oblivious to the fact they we all live in a world-wide paper shuffle of debt -- debt which always should have been credit. Nobody batted an eyelash because that same debt note passed hands countless times to grease everyone's skids.   

 

Sidebar - No one can ever trust a politician, especially guys like the former dead weight Senator Ron Paul who claimed that he would implement sound money. When their lips move, they are lying.  But never in all his days did Ron Paul ever nail the facts with brass tacks like today's report is doing. 

 

Even if you’ve told yourself you’re “not rich enough to worry about it,” you are still rich enough to be sued, taxed, or drained. And if everything is in your personal name or in basic statutory entities, you are rich enough to lose far more than you expect.  But DON'T EVER EXPECT a law professional to ever fess up and come clean. Why not?   Because they were trained for their LAW LICENSE from a private association overseas. The BAR was never American to begin with.

There is also a more subtle ache: the sense that you are not truly sovereign over your own financial life. How can you be when you essentially transacted in stolen merchandise which someday will have to be accounted for after you pass away so that CORPORATIONS can retake whatever they find from your CORPORATION NAME.  You may feel watched, reported on, and boxed in by systems that assume you are a subject, not a free individual. You may want to support family, humanitarian projects, spiritual work, or conscious business ventures, but hesitate because of tax consequences, legal exposure, or fear of making one wrong move. The wrong move starts at being completely misinformed and lied to 24/7/365 your entire life.  You may long to build generational wealth and do good with it, yet quietly worry that government, courts, or predators will always be standing by to take the first and largest share. That quiet anxiety is not an accident; it is the design of a system built on statutory control.

Used by the Wealthy But Meant for Everyone

The Natural Law Trust exists precisely to address these pains at their root, not just at the surface. It is a non-statutory, sovereign, irrevocable, pure trust that stands outside the endless maze of legislative tinkering. It has been quietly used for generations by some of the wealthiest families on Earth, from the Rockefellers to the Hunts, specifically because it is “bullet proof” asset protection.

Properly designed, it is nontaxable and has no tax filing requirements, no public registration, no annual fees, and no ongoing professional maintenance mandated by statute. Yet it is written in plain, simple English so that ordinary peaceful people—not just elites and attorneys—can understand and use it.

Consider the story of a Texas billionaire Hunt. When he died, all that could be found in his personal name was a pickup truck and $5,000 in cash; the rest of his fortune was held in one of these trusts. His brother, as successor trustee, immediately stepped into control of the trust without probate, without death taxes, and without delay. There was no public spectacle, no years of court wrangling, no estate picked apart by fees and outsiders. The trust, as a separate sovereign entity, simply continued, and the wealth quietly passed under its private rules instead of public processes.

Now imagine a more modest but equally important story, closer to our world. A conscious entrepreneur or healer builds a practice, a home, and some investments in their own name, believing good intentions will be enough. A lawsuit or creditor claim suddenly appears, and the court can see substantial assets tied directly to that individual or to their revocable, statutory structures.

If, instead, those assets had long since been placed into a properly designed Natural Law Trust—irrevocable, with a true separation between personal liabilities and trust corpus—there would be nothing for the claimant to realistically reach. The individual could still benefit from the trust’s resources, but the court could not force the trust to pay a judgment against that person.

The Best Medicine is Preventative

The heart of the Natural Law Trust is a simple but radical shift: the ownership of your assets simply changes names.  Instead of them being in your personal name or a statutory name, the title of ownership shifts to the trust.  However, as trustee of the trust, you still retain control of them - - but only in a totally separate, different name with a different government ID number. This creates an impenetrable barrier against you or your statutory entity ever again being vulnerable to attacks by outside parties trying to get the asset from you.  That is why this is called "asset protection".  As trustee over the trust, you still retain the right to enjoy and benefit from the property.

When you don’t own anything, you can’t lose anything to lawsuits, judgments, or estate predators. Your estate, when held in trust, is free from probate and inheritance tax, and it becomes extremely difficult for outsiders to control or even see its inner workings. The trust can pay your lawful expenses, hold your business, manage investments, and support your projects, all while remaining private and sovereign. You gain practical control as the primary trustee, while liability remains shielded behind an entity that owns itself.

If sovereignty sounds abstract, look at it in practical terms. A “sovereign without subjects” is simply someone such as Jim Homyak who manages their affairs without unnecessary interference, while harming no one. The Natural Law Trust honors your right to enter private contracts with others—creator, trustees, beneficiaries—without asking permission from any legislature or bar association. You too, just as Jim does, can ramble around through life to enjoy your retirement.  The NLT operates under the enduring principles of natural law, common law, and universal contract law, rather than under millions of shifting statutes. That means your trust can go on for generations, renewing and adapting, even as political regimes, tax codes, and economic systems rise and fall.

The proof of the practicality of this arrangement is in the 100% success rate of it.  It has been operating this way at least since the 1970s, when our original trust writer and his mentors were active with it, and to this day, the standard template $2,500 dollar Natural Law Trust has never been invalidated or penetrated.  Neither have any of our clients worldwide had any problems with the tax authorities using our Natural Law Trust.  This simple fact proves that it's not just a nice theory.  It has been tested and proven over five decades and counting. See the link below and click into this for payment options.   Jim Homyak and Seth Harris are NOT paid from your participation. This NLT report is NOT a multi-level marketing drive. 

Please note: Never allow anyone to apply the phrase "sovereign citizen movement" over your affairs, because that is an oxymoron or contradiction of terms.  

The Simple Truth

You might worry that something this powerful must be complicated or reserved for legal insiders. In truth, the opposite is the case. The Natural Law Trust (costs a little bit to start) as described here was specifically refined to remove unnecessary legalese and condense the best asset protection principles into a short, understandable document. Perhaps one of you can buy in and use the template much less expensively into the future with other people you know to share in the costs. 

Trustees of small, private Natural Law Trusts do not need institutional degrees; they need integrity, a careful reading of the trust and manual, and access to experienced guidance when questions arise. The elite have kept these instruments out of law schools for a reason—but that does not mean you cannot use them; it only means most ordinary attorneys do not yet understand them. Who cares because most modern attorneys have at least a clue by now just how vast their entire BAR lie has become over centuries of time from Europe originally.

You stand at a crossroads. One path keeps your ALL CAPS ESTATE GAME TOKEN in your personal name or standard statutory entities, continually exposed to predatory claims, shifting laws, monopoly gamers and institutional intrusion, and leaving your heirs at the mercy of probate and taxation lies that may never end. That is until YOU ARISE and end it for your self.

The other path moves your business, investments, property, and future windfalls into a sovereign Natural Law Trust that has never been penetrated or invalidated when properly constructed and operated. That path lets you live, give, and grow generational wealth from a place of protection, privacy, and quiet confidence.

If you are serious about shielding what you have built and amplifying your ability to do good with it, take the step now: buy your Natural Law Trust today and begin moving your affairs into true protection. Just maybe you will find and get to know the love of your life. 

Learn more at BrillianceinCommerce.com.

Details
Written By: Seth Harris and Jim Homyak
Parent Category: Reading Materials
Category: Unruly States of Affairs in the United States of America
Hits: 147

USOA Menu

Member's Virtual Center

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

Older Content