Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

USA Seal

Quick Start Understanding of Government Structure

A State is not a State of State.

 

Read the statement above as many times as necessary and think about it.

Minnesota is not the same as State of Minnesota.

In fact, Minnesota is not the same as The State of Minnesota, the State of Minnesota, or the STATE OF MINNESOTA or anything calling itself the STATE of MINNESOTA or MINNESOTA or…. These are all separate and distinctly different entities.

Minnesota is “corporate” but unincorporated — meaning that it has a name and a physical definition but is not “incorporated” into any other country or corporation.

Minnesota, the actual State, stands alone. It is complete. It has well-defined physical borders and is populated by living people.

All these other things calling themselves some variation of “State of Minnesota” are fundamentally different.

These are called “inchoate states” or “states-of-states” or “incomplete states”.

These States of States are various kinds of business organizations and they have no physical borders and no people live in them.

They are all incorporated, meaning that they are part of larger, parent organizations, and to the extent that they are “inhabited” they are inhabited by “persons” not people.

Persons are officers and employees of corporations who have duties to perform and who “reside” on a temporary basis in our actual States.

Stop a moment and think about what you have just learned.

The people living in Minnesota and the persons working for the State of Minnesota are not in the same political status. They aren’t operating in the same capacities.

Just like a State is not a State of State, one of the people isn’t a person.

The difference is very clear-cut, yet many of us get confused and think that the State of Minnesota is the same as Minnesota, when it is not. We also assume that if you have a pulse, you are one of the people, but in fact, you may be acting in the capacity of a person, instead.

There is an “apples and oranges” difference involved — and it needs to be clearly understood.

You, as one of the people born in a State of the Union, say Virginia, start your life as a Virginian. You are one of the living people of Virginia and you employ the State of Virginia (or some other State of State organization) to do business for you.

However, you can, if you so choose, go to work for the State of Virginia, and accept “an office of personhood”.

Do you see how that changes the capacity in which you are acting?

You went from being one of the people and an employer, to acting as a person and being an employee.

In effect, you left Virginia behind and entered the State of Virginia.

By doing this you subjected yourself to the private rules, codes, regulations, statutes, and policies of this business organization, which is simply in the business of providing “governmental services”.

In addition to accepting a paying job with a State of State, you can unwittingly enter this status if you “volunteer” to serve the State of State as a voter, a tax collector known as a “withholding agent”, a juror, or in any similar capacity.

Finally, there are two other ways you can leave your home in Virginia (or Minnesota or one of the other States of the Union—) and find yourself in the “foreign territory” of a State of State.

You can willingly and knowingly seek welfare benefits from the State of State, or you can be turned over to the State of State as a “ward of the state” — that is, an “incompetent” of some kind — an abandoned child, a pauper, a mental incompetent, or someone so physically incapacitated they can’t care for themselves.

Most of us have been misidentified as “wards” of State of State organizations when we were babies in our cradles. This has been done via False Registration processes that result in equally Unconscionable contracts obligating us to act as persons — known as citizens of the State of State.

So how do you get home to your birthright political status as one of the living people? A free man, a Virginian — living in Virginia, owed all the protections of the Law of the Land?

This question will be answered, but first, we need to look a bit deeper into the What these State of State business organizations really are — and Who or What operates them?

Original Sovereign Jurisdiction – Government of, for, and by the people/People.

Our actual government was set up during The War of Independence, between 1776 and 1781. The first instrumentality of this government was the Union of (E)states, published 4 July 1776, as a result of The Unanimous Declaration of Independence issued by the original colonies. A few months later, in September 9th of 1776, these new States joined together and created a Federation of the States of the Union doing business as The United States of America. Nearly five years later, the States additionally created a Confederation to take up some of the slack and conduct commercial business for them.

All three — the Union, the Federation, and the Confederation — were set up and functional during the Revolutionary War and all three continued to function before, during, and after the Constitutions were adopted more than a decade later.

Stop and think about that.

It is important to understand that the Federal Constitutions (there are three (3) of them) represent the implementation of treaty agreements that were reached with King George and the Pope as part of the Peace Treaties ending The War of Independence.

It is also important to understand that our Federal Constitutions, like all Constitutions, are debt agreements based on service contracts. Someone agrees to do something and someone else agrees to pay for it.

In the case of the Federal Constitutions, the People acting as State Citizens and occupying the international land jurisdiction owed to each of the States, agreed to pay for certain enumerated services and also agreed to delegate the powers needed to perform these services to Subcontractors.

There are nineteen enumerated services and nineteen enumerated “delegated Powers” granted to three (3) Federal Subcontractors. They were/are:

1. The States of America — operated by “the united States of America” [the original Confederation] under “The Constitution for the united States of America” — which were American Subcontractors, organized as States of States, doing business under names styled like this: The State of New York. This organization functioned from 1787 to 1863.

2. The British Territorial United States doing business as “the” United States of America, operating under “The Constitution of the United States of America”.

3. The Municipal United States Government doing business as “the” United States, operating under “The Constitution of the United States”.

Do you notice something important?

Our actual and original government and its instrumentalities — the Union doing business as The United States, and the Federation doing business as The United States of America and the Confederation doing business as the States of America don’t operate under any “Constitution”.

It’s only the Federal Subcontractors that operate under Constitutions.

Why? Because we don’t pay ourselves in gold to mow our own lawns.

So our actual government is the Union, the Federation, and the Confederation.

The Subcontractors are the American Federal, British Territorial and Papal Municipal Businesses.

The American Federal Subcontractors ceased cooperative operations in 1860 (Southern States of States walked out) and the remaining Federal States of States went bankrupt in 1863 (Northern States of States).

So if you took an “Oath” to protect and preserve “the” Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic — were you told any of this?

Did you know that you were taking an “Oath” to support and defend the service contracts of the remaining foreign business interests?

Were you told that you would be working for the Pope (Federal Civil Service) or the Queen (U.S. Military)?

Were you told that the American Federal Subcontractors were out of business, still pending “Reconstruction”? So there was no possibility that you were working directly for the American States and People?

Were you told that, ultimately, no matter which remaining Federal Subcontractor you worked for, Federal Civil Service or U.S. Military, you’d be working for the Pope?

The Pope directly controls the Municipal United States Government and the Federal Civil Service, and indirectly controls the U.S. Military because the Queen operates as his Overseer of Commonwealth — that is, British Territorial operations.

At any time, was it ever your understanding that you were working for the Pope or the British Monarch acting as his Overseer?

Read that — “the” United States refers to the Pope’s Municipal Government and “the” United States of America refers to the Pope’s Territorial/Commonwealth Government under the oversight of the British Monarch.

If you are like most Americans, you thought that “the” United States of America was the same as The United States of America — but one is a foreign British Territorial Subcontractor at the Federal level, and the other is the Federation of States. Actual States.

Exactly which one of these two entities did you mean to give your oath to?

The actual Government of the American States and People, or a foreign Federal Subcontractor?

And if you were never given full disclosure about any of this, why would you feel obligated to an Oath that was made under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure?

What possible legal or lawful obligation could ever be created by such an oath, purloined under conditions of non-disclosure?

States of States

We left off the discussion about the States and the States of States with the question of what are these business organizations? Who or what is running them?

We are now prepared to answer that question — there are two “States of States” organizations in each State of the Union.

One is a British Territorial State of State organization operating under names styled like this:

“the” State of New Hampshire.

The other is a Municipal STATE OF STATE organization operating under names styled like this:
“the” STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.

There are not supposed to be any Municipal STATES OF STATES operating within the borders of our actual States of the Union. In fact, there should be no “Municipalities” anywhere on our soil and no Municipal Corporations, either.

The Constitution of the United States only provides for one Municipality — the Municipality of Washington, DC — and that is limited to the “one mile square” located within the Boundary Stones designated for it within the District of Columbia.

The Territorial States of States are, strictly speaking, not allowed either. They came in and usurped into the vacuum of power created when the American States of States ceased functioning — as an “emergency measure”.

They’ve kept the “emergency” going ever since, and never bothered to explain any of this to the American Public.

So we’ve had Cuckoo Bird British Territorial States of States operating in our States, and these organizations have operated in collusion with the Municipal STATES OF STATES to rob the actual States and people blind.

They formalized their collaboration via “The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States”, signed in 1937.

The clear duty that these Federal Subcontractors owed to us was to fully disclose the situation at the end of the Civil War and to assist us in Good Faith to restore our lawful government to full form and function.

Instead, they left our actual flag faced down, struck, in the Capitol Rotunda, in the Senate Chambers and the House Chambers, and did nothing too correct.

They couldn’t even take care of the Title IV Flag we allowed them to use when exercising our “Delegated Powers” — they let a pirate like Russell-J: Gould walk into the capitol and claim it as if it were their property — instead of property belonging to us, The United States of America, the States of the Union, the American States and People.

Hordes of foreign political lobbyists have infested our Capitol and used our Public Resources and treasuries and assets as if we were gone on an endless holiday, “lost at sea”, and our erstwhile Allies, the Governments of Great Britain and Westminster, fed on our substance and plundered and pillaged our States and our people for generations.

These are the facts.

And if you are Americans, it’s time to take stock of them.

Please note that the deceptions involved are all similar forms of deceit.

We have been led to mistake States of States for States, Territorial States of States for Confederate States of States, foreign Municipal STATES OF STATES for businesses that have a right to be on our soil, people for persons, “the” United States of America for The United States of America, and even “the” United States of America, Incorporated, as The United States of America.

No wonder people are confused.

No wonder this country has been kept at constant war. No wonder that our institutions and our social fabric have decayed. No wonder that generations of “public school” children have been fed pablum and false assumptions. No wonder that our country has declined in absolutely every category of measurable achievement.

We can’t tell our butt from buttercups without extreme effort on our own parts to delve out our own well-obscured history and map it out as we have just mapped it out for you.

And it all begins with the simple observation that a State is not a State of State.

Right now, the Perpetrators of these confusions have been thrown into havoc, because their constructive frauds and deceits and embezzlements have been discovered and brought forward.

Both “the” United States doing business as “the” UNITED STATES, INC., and “the” United States of America, doing business as “the” United States of America, Inc., have been bankrupted for cause and criminality.

Both remaining Federal Subcontractors are at least temporarily out of pocket, out of business, scrabbling around to create some new deceptively named corporation they can throw into the gap and hope to continue the same old game. In Scotland, they recently created a new version of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (INC.) and we have already complained about their continuing abuse of our name and trademark.

By Operation of Law, when a power delegated to another Principal or Party can no longer be exercised by that Principal or Party due to their incompetence — as in bankruptcy incompetence — the delegated power returns back to the Delegating Power.

In this case, the Delegated Powers have returned to The United States of America.

If you made an Oath to serve under those Delegated (and Abused) Powers, your Oath has returned to us, too.

 

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of DebtThe Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN