Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

 

Regarding copyright, see Legal Notice on the linked page:

http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/12/public-international-declaration-and.html

Friday, December 1, 2023

By: Anna Von Reitz


Please notice that this entire discussion is about the administration of "these" United States, meaning the British Territorial United States, dba the United States of America, Incorporated.

It is not about The United States, our country, nor does it concern our States of the Union, nor our international government doing business as The United States of America, an unincorporated Federation of States.

This is entirely, 100%, about the mismanagement of our British Territorial Subcontractors and their States of States organizations representing their own citizenry and their own District Banks which were set up in May of 1865 and operated as "National" Bank Associations--- with the "nations" represented being all the British Territorial Persons/Residents identified as U.S. Citizens in each State of the Union.

Congressman Louis T. McFadden was sitting in the British Territorial United States Congress when he gave the speeches and made the remarks being examined here.

Now, as to how the gross mechanism of national identity theft and the siphon used to create national level embezzlement works, please hear the words of Congressman Louis T. McFadden as spoken on the floor of the House of Representatives and as recorded in the Congressional Record:

"In 1912 the National Monetary Association, under the chairmanship of the late Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, made a report and presented a vicious bill called the National Reserve Association bill. This bill is usually spoken of as the Aldrich bill. Senator Aldrich did not write the Aldrich bill. He was the tool, if not the accomplice, of the European bankers who for nearly twenty years had been scheming to set up a central bank in this Country and who in 1912 has spent and were continuing to spend vast sums of money to accomplish their purpose."

The Aldrich Bills of 1907-1911 urged the creation of an "emergency currency" under the private centralized control of unaccountable private bankers, none of whom were elected by the public and none subject to any public oversight.

That "emergency currency" was the Federal Reserve Note.

The "emergency" was the 1906-07 bankruptcy of the Scottish Interloper, The United States of America, Incorporated, set up and incorporated by the British Territorial Government in 1868.

None of this has anything to do with this actual country, and is not anything that the British Territorial Government was authorized to do "for" us. This is entirely about their mismanagement of their corporations, their corporate bankruptcies, and their monetary policies including their need for an "emergency currency" backed by private banks.

McFadden continues:

"We were opposed to the Aldrich plan for a central bank. The men who rule the Democratic Party then promised the people that if they were returned to power there would be no central bank established here while they held the reins of government. Thirteen months later that promise was broken, and the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister Wall Street figures who stood behind Colonel House, established here in our free Country the worm-eaten monarchical institution of the "King's Bank" to control us from the top downward, and from the cradle to the grave."

The worm-eaten institution of the "King's Bank" McFadden referenced is the same [King's] Equity Court [Bank] established in association with the [King's] Equity Law established in the 1750's by Lord Mansfield.

We have explained this pollution of the English Common Law with Admiralty Law elsewhere, and the evils resulting from impersonating people as Persons, i.e., Corporations, belonging to the King.

The end result of Equity Law is that the entire "Equity" in individual private estates belongs to the King; the Court "salvages" the King's interest in the "vessels entered on the docket" and, after taking a percentage for its own efforts (the CRIS Account in this country), returns the rest to the Bank of England, which takes its cut, and submits the rest to the Royal Treasury.

None of this, not the courts, not the law, and not the court/bank have anything to do with Americans.

This is all about the "Residents" -- the foreign British Territorial Residents allowed to be here under the Residence Act to provide us with "essential government services".

The "emergency currency" known as the Federal Reserve Note was needed by these Residents because they had exhausted the investors in the private "Green Back" currency initiated by Abraham Lincoln-- an earlier swindle in which investors paid in gold and were repaid with paper.

Aldrich was proposing, without so many words, to replace the failing Greenbacks which had been funded by "1040 Bonds" purchased by private investors, with a private military (Admiralty) scrip backed by "associations" of private mostly international investment banks.

This new "emergency currency", the Federal Reserve Note, would naturally be a debt note issued by these private investment banks against the value of the King's interest in the Residents' labor and earthly estate, administered under Equity Law.

All that was left to do to create The Siphon was a means to mischaracterize all the Americans as Residents in their own country -- that is, U.S. Citizens. That part was accomplished via various Territorial Congress Maternity Act attempts ending with the Sheppard-Towner Act of 1921.

These private, unknown, unelected, unaccountable and deceitfully named "Federal" Reserve Banks now had -- theoretically, complete access to all assets public and private in this country to use as collateral backing their issuance of "Federal Reserve Notes".

They were enabled by the practice of fractional reserve banking to issue seven to ten times more credit than the value of the asset backing the credit.

What began with enslavement of their own U.S. Citizen (Residents) was spread to the general American public via the undisclosed "Birth Registrations", and it was so profitable, that they extended the same criminal system to the Commonwealth and the seventeen western European countries and Japan which were occupied in the wake of World War II.

To pay off the debt owed to the original Greenback investors in Lincoln's "1040 Bonds" the Perpetrators introduced "Federal Income Taxes" and "1040 Forms", by which they taxed their Employees and their Dependents for the privilege of Federal Employment and the use of Federal Reserve Notes.

They hired the private foreign Inquisition Service known as the Internal Revenue Service to collect this tax as a war reparations collection, and brought the Internal Revenue Service ashore in this country as a Delaware Corporation registered in 1925.

For each American mischaracterized as a Resident (and U.S. Citizen) via the undisclosed Birth Registration process, the Territorial United States Department of Commerce additionally created a Municipal Corporation in the victim's NAME, to act as a "citizen of the United States" defined as a "United States citizen" under the Diversity Clause of Title 28, for the purposes of war debt collection under their defunct Scottish Corporation's Fourteenth Amendment.

This CITIZEN was taxed on all Federal Income, and as the only currency the Perpetrators allowed in this country was their very own Federal Reserve Note, the circle was now complete.

They did have to allow Americans to endorse checks and denominate them as "lawful money" and claim exemptions under Federal Title 12, which the Vermin didn't honor, but, for the main, their objectives -- unlimited access to our credit and coercive means to illegally confiscate or control our assets -- was attained.

Once created by the Territorial Department of Commerce, the brand new Municipal CORPORATIONS operated in the victim's NAMES as "United States citizens" were shipped off to Puerto Rico for administration under the Spanish Law of the Inquisition. Puerto Rico remains a British Commonwealth nation and retained the Spanish Law of the Inquisition from its original land jurisdiction government.

Thus, by Equity Law in Maritime Commerce and by Spanish Law of the Inquisition on the land, the Perpetrators sought to place themselves in an impenetrable legal cocoon by first impersonating their victims and then subjecting them under foreign law systems given to abject despotism.

Quoting McFadden again:

"The Federal Reserve Bank destroyed our old and characteristic way of doing business. It discriminated against our 1-name commercial paper, the finest in the world, and it set up the antiquated 2-name paper, which is the present curse of this Country and which wrecked every country which has ever given it scope; it fastened down upon the Country the very tyranny from which the framers of the Constitution sought to save us."

McFadden was greatly respected as the senior member on the House Banking and Currency Committee for more than ten years.

Here, by his testimony, we see that prior to the Federal Reserve System, only one authority appeared as the Issuer of Credit and that authority was singularly responsible for it and in control of it.

Most importantly, the American Federal Republic Office of The Secretary of the Treasury was a Public Office -- appointed, but still accountable to the Public. The Territorial office of the Secretary of the Treasury -- meaning their private corporation's "treasury" -- is not.

Under the Federal Reserve System two private, unknown, unelected, unaccountable corporation employees acting under deceptive job titles issued the Federal Reserve Note.

These characters calling themselves the "Secretary of the Treasury" and "Secretary of the United States" respectively were the Officers of a District of Columbia Municipal Corporation calling itself the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and another foreign Municipal Corporation residing in the District of Columbia calling itself the "FEDERAL RESERVE".

These are the names of the corporations displayed on each and every Federal Reserve Note, and they are basically claiming that each of these CORPORATIONS are standing good for the debt notes being issued; however, as we've seen, the credit is based on the labor and assets of all the presumed British Territorial Residents, aka, U.S. Citizens, which are claimed under Equity Law as assets belonging to the King and then claimed again under Spanish Law of the Inquisition as "United States citizens" --- assets belonging to the Pope.

Put bluntly, the British Monarch and the Popes have been skinning us all blind for 160 years, first by one fraud scheme (1040 Bonds) and then by another (Federal Reserve Notes).

They have done this while sanctimoniously pretending to act as our Custodians and Trustees, and also pretending that this had nothing to do with Americans --- only people who volunteered to act as U.S. Citizens and as citizens of the United States.

Vast numbers of Americans have been illegally and immorally registered as U.S. Citizens under conditions of secrecy --- not mere non-disclosure. The Unconscionable Birth Registration contracts were not disclosed to our parents and were constructed while we were babies in our cradles, when we were unable to know anything about these contracts or the unlawful conversion of our natural political status they allowed.

We, rank and file Americans, were never meant to know or understand a thing about any of this.

When we inquired, we were rebuffed and placed under "suspicion" and hounded by corporation officials and private agency security personnel disguised as our own peacekeeping forces.

When we attempted to claim our exemptions and our right to denominate bank deposits as lawful money, we were attacked by the IRS and our accounts were closed.

You might think that the actual Employees of these corporations would have known that they were committing crimes, but for the most part, that is not the case. You might also think that they legitimately owed Federal Income Taxes as a condition of employment, but as this and other nasty conditions of such employment were never fully disclosed to them, none of their employment contracts are legitimate.

All of this, absolutely all of it, falls under the umbrella of Gross Breach of Trust and Violation of Commercial Service Contracts per our Final Judgment issued in April of 2014 --- which has been published and distributed and recorded worldwide.

It is also reflected throughout our unrebutted Public Lien Process and J'Accuse Affidavit published in 2015 -- similarly published and distributed worldwide.

All these mechanizations were accomplished via unlawful conversion, and need to be reversed by the process of lawful conversion, returning these banks, corporations, and all assets and credit to the living people and Lawful Governments they are heir to, subject to the Public Law and Law of the Land each country is heir to.

This is why we require the world accounts to be turned upside down, with the impersonated and misrepresented Debtors appearing in their right guise as the Creditors, and all their purloined assets and credits returned to them, not limited to all the off-ledger and historical and legacy trust assets and assets of the offending corporations responsible for this repugnant and unconscionable swindle.

All the "Federal Income Tax" and "Property Tax" and "Social Security Tax" and other taxes incorrectly assessed against Americans as a result of the unconscionable Birth Registrations and undisclosed enrollments in Federal Pension Programs (later redefined as welfare programs) such as Social Security, together with reasonable and customary interest, must be returned to the victims.

Absent direct, knowing, and fully consensual agreement on the part of individuals, all people now living in this country, and any other country affected by this vast crime, must be released from all and any legal presumptions created by unconscionable, implied, unilateral, secret or undisclosed contracting and registration processes.

Average Americans, Australians, Canadians, Japanese, Germans, et. alia who have been impacted by these crimes must be considered civilians living in their own country under peacetime conditions.

The assets and credit belonging to the living people and their lawful governments must be returned to them and restitution must be made. Taxes collected under False Pretenses and interest charged on non-existent debts must be returned to the victims or their heirs as pre-paid credit.

Any courts left operating must operate according to the Public Law and the Law of the Land, or, they must demonstrate verified and fully disclosed Maritime or Admiralty contracts and subject matter in order to operate in those venues.

All Maritime Commerce Banks, Equity Banks, Probate Banks, Reserve Banks, etc., and their Associations and Accounts, are subject to lawful conversion in expiation of their crimes and omissions. All these banks must henceforth operate as land jurisdiction banks and be restructured as Bilateral Banks operating under the Public Law and Law of the Land.

All debt being held against the victims of this farce must be reversed and ledgered as credit not subject to taxation or usury of any kind.

In the event that a nation's lawful government has been destroyed or rendered inoperable by this fraud, the people will stand under the protection of the unincorporated Federation of States and our Public Law until such time as they can declare their proper political status, organize their lawful government, and regain their normal state of independence. Their assets will be returned to them and to their control. The credit owed to them will be issued as prepaid credit, free and clear of any taxation or usury.

Any bank resisting lawful conversion and offering to dispute these findings, cured claims, and court proceedings --and wishing to continue these criminal abuses of our identities, assets, and credit-- will be liquidated and their Boards of Directors and Officers will be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of International and Public Law.

Thanks to Congressman McFadden and thousands of other Americans who have preserved our country's identity and revealed the misdeeds of Municipal and Territorial Government Officials, our American Government is still present and accounted for and our claims against these Miscreants are cured.

"A good man leaves an inheritance for his children, but the wealth of the wicked is stored up for the just." --Proverbs 13:22.

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

December 1st 2023
----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

*************************************************************

 

Proverbs 13:22 - New International Version

A good person leaves an inheritance for their children’s children, but a sinner’s wealth is stored up for the righteous.

 

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of DebtThe Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN