Unruly State of Affairs in the United States of America

USOA v2.0 -- April 2025 -- Education & Outreach Committee -- HelpDesk Support is available... Click here to visit the Contact Page...

 

Shall We Trigger Some Compensatory Cardiac Arrhythmias? Anyone?

By: Jim Homyak - 5-Nov-2026

In layman's terms, I'm gonna start into another deep roller-coaster ride like I've been doing lately. Here's my narrative.

CAUTION: I'm gonna throw in some elevated Blood Pressure and pulse pounding excitement too. 

As the middle-aged male human body is undergoing systemic anemia/hematology related causes for low Hemoglobin, low Hematocrit and low Red Blood Cell Count, and then the body has foreign substances placed into the mouth for modern Dentistry treatments, we begin my newest little story -- which could certainly become a big story afterall.

Later that evening more blood flow is needed to filter those dental substances, metabolize then and try converting them into other useful chemical substances.

I now know is it entirely possible, if not expected, that the heart can experience arrhythmias such as very fast extra beats for a short time until the demand for processing decreases.

https://newsroom.heart.org/news/treating-gum-disease-after-heart-rhythm-ablation-reduced-risk-of-afib-recurrence

As a middle-aged male body experiences such systemic anemia—the blood's oxygen-carrying capacity is significantly diminished.

To compensate for this oxygen deficit, the cardiovascular system naturally increases its output (cardiac output) by raising the heart rate and stroke volume, ensuring that vital organs continue to receive adequate perfusion. The vital signs naturally may elevate much higher than normal.

According to medical physiology texts, when a foreign substance or dental material is introduced during modern dental procedures, or when the body subsequently increases systemic blood flow later that evening to metabolize, filter, or process these compounds, the metabolic demand on tissues rises further.

In an already compromised, anemic state where myocardial oxygen supply is limited, this heightened workload can trigger compensatory cardiac arrhythmias, such as premature atrial or ventricular contractions (rapid-fire extra beats or palpitations) that persist until the metabolic demand subsides and equilibrium is restored.

Furthermore, physiological stress, systemic inflammation, or mild autonomic activation (such as a vasovagal response or sympathetic surge) associated with dental interventions can unmask or exacerbate underlying rhythm disturbances. Anemic hearts are particularly susceptible to ectopic beats because the myocardium is working harder with fewer oxygen-rich red blood cells, creating an electrically unstable environment in the heart tissue.

Once the liver and kidneys process the circulating substances and the overall metabolic rate decreases, the ectopic beats typically resolve.

However, because palpitations and arrhythmias can occasionally signal more serious underlying ischemic or structural cardiac issues—especially in middle-aged adults—any persistent or distressing rhythm changes warrant a formal evaluation by a physician or cardiologist.

For openers too, in today's BIG PHARMA ecosphere, we would hope, for the patient's sake, that they advocate for themselves by taking on a majority of the ensuing responsibility. .

Now imagine that an oral infection is behind the anemia in the first place:

When any chronic oral infection—such as severe apical periodontitis, an untreated dental abscess, or advanced periodontal disease—serves as the underlying driver of anemia, the physiological dynamics shift significantly.

Chronic infections trigger a sustained inflammatory response characterized by the elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukin-6 (IL-6). According to hematology and pathology reference texts, IL-6 stimulates the hepatic production of hepcidin, a master regulatory peptide hormone of iron metabolism.

Elevated hepcidin levels trap iron within macrophages and inhibit intestinal iron absorption, leading to functional iron restriction and the classic presentation known as anemia of chronic disease (ACD) or anemia of chronic inflammation.

In this state, even if total body iron stores are adequate, the bone marrow cannot access the iron required to manufacture sufficient red blood cells, resulting in low hemoglobin, reduced hematocrit, and a depressed red blood cell count.

When a middle-aged male with an infection-driven anemic state undergoes a dental procedure, the physiological burden on the cardiovascular system is compounded by dual stressors: the intrinsic demands of systemic hypoxia and the ongoing systemic inflammatory load of the oral infection.

Chronic dental infections are independently associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular complications, as circulating inflammatory mediators can endothelial dysfunction and increase cardiac workload.

If a foreign dental material or substance is subsequently introduced, and the body's metabolic and circulatory systems must increase blood flow later that evening to process, detoxify, or filter these compounds, the already overworked, hypoxic myocardium faces a severe oxygen supply-demand mismatch.

Under these conditions, the electrical stability of the heart is compromised, making it highly prone to compensatory arrhythmias and premature extra beats (ectopic beats).

The heart rate accelerates and irregular contractions manifest as the cardiovascular system attempts to perfuse tissues operating under both anemia-induced hypoxia and infection-related metabolic stress.

These rhythm disturbances generally persist as transient palpitations until the foreign substance is metabolized and the immediate metabolic surge subsides, but they underscore the critical clinical importance of treating the underlying oral infection to relieve both the hematological and cardiac strain.

Meanwhile let's administer back-to-back doses of ESA and Iron intervenously as a band-aid fix—supported by algorithm rather than independent study or intellect in truthful discussion amongst a patient and care team

When Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) and intravenous (IV) iron are administered back-to-back as an acute intervention to correct anemia, the physiological landscape undergoes a rapid and dramatic shift.

In the setting of an underlying chronic oral infection, this aggressive therapy attempts to override the hepcidin-mediated iron blockade by flooding the system with bioavailable iron and directly signaling the bone marrow via ESAs to ramp up erythropoiesis (red blood cell production). While this pharmacological strategy is designed to eventually raise hemoglobin, hematocrit, and red blood cell counts, the immediate aftermath of administering these agents introduces a fresh wave of physiological stress on an already vulnerable cardiovascular system.

The sudden acceleration of bone marrow activity requires an immense amount of cellular energy, oxygen, and metabolic turnover. Furthermore, IV iron administration can transiently induce oxidative stress, endothelial activation, and minor systemic vasomotor changes.

When combined with the baseline hypoxia of the anemia, the residual inflammatory burden of the oral infection, and the metabolic processing of substances introduced during recent dental care, the heart is subjected to a severe oxygen supply-demand mismatch.

The myocardium must suddenly pump blood at an increased rate to support the metabolic demands of rapid blood cell synthesis while simultaneously handling tissue perfusion under deficient oxygenation. This acute cardiovascular strain frequently triggers electrical instability, manifesting as transient cardiac arrhythmias, premature atrial or ventricular contractions (extra beats), and pronounced palpitations that persist until the sudden metabolic surge subsides and systemic equilibrium is re-established.


As you know from my other rants going on. . . 

The Racket

Kidney Failure Reversal 


Does it make sense that clinicians can get it all backwards when they fail to recognize oral pathologies at the outset in any given patient?

Yes, it makes complete clinical sense that physicians and specialists can misinterpret a complex clinical picture when they fail to identify an underlying oral pathology at the outset. In modern medical practice, subspecialties are often heavily compartmentalized; cardiologists focus on the electrical and mechanical function of the heart, hematologists investigate bone marrow output and red blood cell indices, and dentists manage the oral cavity.

When any given patient presents with systemic manifestations—such as refractory anemia of chronic disease, unexplained systemic inflammation, or stress-induced cardiac arrhythmias—a failure to perform a comprehensive head, neck, and dental evaluation can lead clinicians to treat downstream epiphenomena rather than the root cause. 

If you keep telling your Doctor(s) that you're going to begin demanding "root cause analysis" please prepare your mind to realize you're going to become a lower priority for a majority of physicians who simply ARE NOT up to speed in modern research.

Back when they attended medical school, years back, they likely were not taught to delve too deeply in an industry that is heavily driven by diagnosis codes, reimbursement strategies, pharmaceutical regimens and revenue generating initiatives brought forth in the mainstream payer landscape. They were industrially compartmentalized.  NOT YOUR FAULT!

When clinicians miss a chronic dental abscess or severe periodontitis, they often get the clinical sequence "backwards."

Instead of eradicating the chronic bacterial load and inflammatory cytokine engine driving hepatic hepcidin production (which suppresses iron utilization and causes anemia), they may rely entirely on pharmacological band-aids like back-to-back Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) and intravenous iron.

While these interventions artificially force the bone marrow to produce red blood cells, they do nothing to halt the ongoing systemic inflammation.

Consequently, the patient remains in a hyper-inflammatory, high-workload state where subsequent metabolic stressors—such as dental procedures or processing foreign substances—continue to trigger myocardial oxygen supply-demand mismatches, ectopic beats, and arrhythmias. Recognizing the mouth-body connection is vital for breaking this cycle and achieving true, holistic resolution.


I invite you to drop me a line if you're interested in some deep and revealing conversation. Think about having your blood tested for heavy metals exposure beginning with mercury, lead and radioactive materials. 


Disclaimer: I never intend to provide medical advice. However I am always going to encourage you to become the leader in your care teams. Be your own best advocate. Participate in your #1 responsibility to care for your wellness and longevity. Realize that as an American, you're in a battle with Allopathic Western Medicine that focuses primarily on Drugs and Resection Surgeries.

 

 

  •  

     

    THE ABUNDANCE PARADIGM: WHY AI FORCES A RETHINKING OF MONEY ITSELF — PART 1

    By Ellen Brown on May 11, 2026

    Ellen's Facebook Page

    A Universal Basic Income (UBI) has long been proposed as a way to cushion the blow of jobs lost to automation. Under that model, everyone receives a modest monthly payment – enough to cover basic needs and prevent extreme poverty. 

    But Elon Musk has gone further. On April 16, he posted on X:

    Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI.

    Rather than a subsistence stipend, Universal High Income (UHI) would be a level of income allowing ordinary people to live well in a world where machines do most of the work. Musk has also said that AI and robotics are the only things that can solve the massive U.S. debt crisis. 

    That sounds promising, but where will the government get the money to pay the UHI? Critics say any government that tried it would go bankrupt. There are also other concerns, which will be addressed in Part 2 of this article. Here we will look at the financial underpinnings: why UHI is even thinkable, why AI forces a reexamination of how money enters the economy, why the current system cannot scale to meet what is coming, and the implicit transition needed to meet that challenge.

    Why the Current Money System Cannot Scale

    The national debt of the U.S. government just topped $39 trillion. China’s is $18.7 trillion. Japan’s is $8.6 trillion. Those of the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain are each in the multi-trillion-dollar range. Collective global debt now stands at $353 trillion, 305% of the world’s annual economic output. So even if, hypothetically, everything produced in the world in a year were applied toward liquidating the debt, it still would not be enough to pay it all off. 

    In fact the debt can never be repaid, because of the way money currently enters the system. Nearly all of the money supply today is created by banks when they make loans. Banks do not lend their existing capital. The loan itself creates the money once the underwriting checkpoint is assured the borrower(s) will be able to sustain the several months or years of timely payments. The bank adds the loan amount to the asset side of its balance sheet and balances that sum with the same amount on the liability side. When the borrower withdraws or transfers the funds, either the bank takes them from its reserves in “vault cash” or the Federal Reserve debits the bank’s digital reserve account at the central bank. But the lending bank typically has funds coming into its reserve account at about the same rate as they are going out, so its reserves are continually replenished. Thus a very small reserve account can support a much larger money creation engine. For decades before the Fed discontinued the reserve requirement in 2020, it hovered at around 10%.

    The chief problem with this debt-based system is the interest, which the bank does not create in its original loan. For a typical long-term loan, interest can double the total tab or more. Where is the money to come from to pay this added liability? Across the system as a whole, it must either come from more borrowing or from existing funds. In the case of governments, that means issuing interest-bearing bonds or tapping taxes and other revenues. The interest on the debt compounds, meaning the government is paying interest on interest. This makes the debt increase exponentially, until it is mathematically unsustainable. Seems a foreclosure is the goal as signed off on by a borrower. Then bankruptcies occur, of banks or even whole governments. Booms turn into busts, and the cycle begins again.

    Today, interest on the federal debt is the second largest budget line item after Social Security, exceeding $1 trillion. Meanwhile, workers are losing jobs to AI/robotics, shrinking the income tax base. The system is clearly unsustainable.

    How to Raise Demand to Scale to the Upcoming Supply

    A Universal High Income would replenish the shrinking tax base by replacing the lost wages of unemployed workers. But where will the money come from to pay the UHI? The only sustainable solution is for the government to issue it interest-free. That does not mean through the Federal Reserve, which creates money in the same way banks do: it buys federal interest-bearing securities with accounting entries. The Fed collects the interest, which it is supposed to return to the Treasury after deducting its costs. But since 2008, its costs include paying interest on the reserves of its participating banks, which consumes its profits. (See my earlier article here.) 

    The only interest-free, debt-free solution that will actually increase the money supply sufficiently to match the projected productivity of AI/robotics is for the money to be issued directly by the Treasury.

    This is not a radical new idea. It is authorized in the U.S. Constitution, which provides in Article 1, Sec. 8, that “The Congress shall have Power To … coin Money [and] regulate the Value thereof .…” Abraham Lincoln used government-issued “Greenbacks” to avoid a crippling debt to British-backed bankers. Debt-free government-issued money was also the funding mechanism by which the American colonists succeeded in creating a thriving economy and liberating themselves from the oppressive yoke of the British Empire.

    In his 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper-Currency,” Benjamin Franklin argued that a lack of currency was a tax on industrious farmers and producers, and that a reliable, locally issued paper currency was the “oil” for the gears of trade. The “Nature and Necessity” of this currency was to facilitate the movement of goods between neighbors. Franklin observed that the British strategy of keeping the colonies short of cash was a method of economic suppression. By forcing the colonies to use gold and silver, which were constantly drained back to London to pay for imports, the Crown kept the colonies in a state of permanent debt and low productivity. When the money supply matched the productive capacity of the people, universal prosperity resulted without inflation. 

    This logic evolved into the “American System of Political Economy” championed by Henry Carey, economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln. He wrote:

    Two systems are before the world… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. … One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.

    In the context of the 21st century, the “oil” that best lowers the friction of trade is debt-free government-issued money similar to Lincoln’s Greenbacks and colonial scrip. Rather than implementing a radical financial innovation, we would be returning to our roots.

    Inflation or Deflation?

    The chief objection to the colonies’ paper “scrip” was that they tended to over-print, so that “demand” (money) outstripped supply. Too much money chasing too few goods produced price inflation. But in the 21st century, we will soon have the opposite problem: too little money chasing too many goods. Machines don’t need food, clothing, shelter, transportation, medical treatment or other services. So who will buy those goods and services? 

    Money needs to be issued to human consumers, and not just to a few wealthy human consumers serving as debt brokers thriving on interest. To create sufficient demand for the voluminous output of AI/robotics, it needs to go to the whole national population, evenly distributed. Not only can UHI work in that sort of abundant supply without producing price inflation; it is actually essential to prevent deflation.

    In a conversation on X, Musk wrote:

    In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robotics massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. 

    As paraphrased on Yahoo Finance (reposted from Benzinga), Musk wrote that handing out more dollars becomes a problem only when the economy’s supply of goods and services fails to surge alongside the money supply. His claim is that AI and robotics could lift production so sharply that the bigger risk would be falling prices, not rising ones.

    But aren’t falling prices a good thing? In this case, no. Prices would be falling due to a lack of demand, meaning producers can’t find customers for their products. They wind up laying off workers and eventually going bankrupt. When spread across the whole economy, the result is a deflationary spiral: prices fall, businesses lose revenue, and the economy contracts, not because production is inadequate but because purchasing power is insufficient. The result is recession or depression. In the Great Depression of the 1930s, food was rotting in the fields while people were starving, because they were out of work and had no money to spend. 

    Job cuts from AI are already happening. According to the same Benzinga article:

    Evidence of near-term strain is showing up in corporate announcements: employers disclosed more than 27,000 job cuts linked to AI in the first quarter of 2026, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The outplacement firm said that figure was up 40% from the same period a year earlier. 

    Robert Reich reports that wages are around two-thirds of the typical corporation’s total cost, and that in the first four months of 2026, big U.S. corporations cut over 128,000 jobs. 

    How Soon Will All This Happen?

    Another Benzinga article, reposted on Yahoo Finance on March 16, detailed Musk’s projected time frame:

    Speaking remotely to the Abundance Summit last week, Musk told XPRIZE founder Peter Diamandis that the global economy is on the verge of an explosion so massive it defies historical precedent.

    “I’d say the economy is 10 times its current size in 10 years,” Musk said, before quickly clarifying that the growth could be even more explosive. “Greater than,” he added, framing the projected shift in economic output as a “fairly comfortable prediction.” …

    Ray Kurzweil, author of The Singularity Is Near, sees AI reaching Artificial General Intelligence (human-level intelligence across virtually all domains) by 2029, and full transformative abundance by 2045.

    Other experts question these time projections, but a radical transformation of traditional manufacturing and trade is likely to happen sometime in the reasonably near future. The question is, will the money system transition soon enough to rescue all the laid-off workers from homelessness and famine?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund Alternative

    There is another model for distributing the gains of automation, one that can be phased in gradually as the AI workforce expands. It comes from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI. In an ironic twist, Altman and Musk, who jointly founded OpenAI in 2015, are now locked in a high-profile legal battle over whether Altman diverted Musk’s $44 million investment to transform what was conceived as a nonprofit “for the benefit of humanity” into a highly lucrative for-profit enterprise.

    That dispute aside, Altman’s alternative model for sharing AI-generated wealth is a national sovereign wealth fund seeded by the profits of AI and robotics. His proposed American Equity Fund would take public stakes in the companies and technologies driving automation, capture a portion of the resulting productivity gains, and distribute them as universal dividends. The Fund would not replace a Universal High Income but would complement it.

    This approach has several advantages. It ties payments directly to real output, scales automatically with productivity, and can be introduced gradually, avoiding the shock of issuing large payments before the supply side has fully expanded. It would resemble the Alaska Permanent Fund, which distributes oil revenues to residents, except that here the resource would be the most powerful general-purpose technology since electricity.

    Conclusion: A New Monetary Logic for a New Productive Era

    For centuries, money has been issued as a claim against the future productivity of human labor, repaid from the income that labor generates. The logic of this debt-based system collapses when machines become the primary producers of goods and services. Then the limiting factor becomes purchasing power — the ability of human beings to access the abundance their own technologies create. That requires a monetary architecture that expands with output rather than debt, and distributes income not through wages alone but through mechanisms tied to the productive capacity of the whole system.

    Universal High Income and a sovereign wealth fund are two ways of doing that. One ensures a stable floor of demand; the other ensures that the public shares in the gains of automation. Both would be grounded in real production. But for the public to have access to those gains, the money supply needs to expand in proportion to the expanding pool of goods and services. This can be done by restoring the innovation our forefathers baked into the Constitution: debt-free money issued by the government itself.

    How to fund a UHI without triggering inflation or driving the government into bankruptcy is the first objection critics raise, but there are others. They argue that people would stop working or stop learning, that society would collapse into idleness or chaos, that life would lose meaning without jobs, that the government would have the power to control how people spend their money.  Will a UHI ring in the promised utopia or lock us into a state-controlled digital prison? Part 2 of this article will address those concerns. 

    _______________

    This article was first posted as an original to ScheerPost.com. Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of thirteen books including Web of Debt, The Public Bank Solution, and Banking on the People: Democratizing Money in the Digital Age. Her 400+ blog articles are posted at EllenBrown.com.tom of Form

    _______________

    Here is my comment awaiting moderation on Ellen's blog as I do hope I survive the decision of her moderator:

    James Allen Homyak, an inventive and creative Minnesotan, contends that as natural thinking and critical thinking Americans begin to privately employ a non-big-tech open source operating system solution inside their households (directed to assist and empower in virtually every facet of living) to provide knowledge management and decision support, for fitting more precisely within the DYNAMICS OF THAT HOUSEHOLD, people would become empowered in many unique ways blocked for over a couple centuries by CORRUPT BAR MEMBERS and ROBBER BARONS long gone. Unfortunately their devastating effects lived on in the corporatized shifting of the "balance of power" away from younger generations and dreaming families. Set on making a buck for a distant shareholder populace.. Jim loves to call people's attention to Ellen's content on his own portal. 

    Perhaps one day home ai will obsolete the need for massive data centers to data mine and control the subservient masses.

     _______________

     Now if Jim did something like this as he plans, the definition of a.i. would become very likely some better sets of words:   

    Active Inquiry

    Actual Intent

    Actionable Intelligence 

     

     

  •  

    WAY TO GO MR PUTIN - RUSSIA FINALIZES 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN

    Posted By: The_Fox [Send E-Mail]
    Date: Thursday, 1-Dec-2022 05:31:08
    www.rumormill.news/212414

     

    Many a time I often think about moving to Russia, so sick and tired of living here in the West.

    Over there things get done and child molesters etc don't just get away with a slapped wrist, free to again prey on the innocent.

    Those promoting society's moral decay will now have to answer for their actions also.

    Way to go Mr Putin.

    Read more: 'LBGTQ PROPAGANDA' BAN